On 9 July 2012 19:06, DATACOM - Samuel Lucas wrote:
> [...]
> I'm wondering if it's safe to use a single ccache directory for both
> architectures or I must use separated directories for each architecture. The
> compiler's mtime, size and content are the same for both.
>
> Does anyone knows if cca
On 9 July 2012 19:35, Richard Maw wrote:
> However if you use ccache via a symlink it may use realpath, which I
> think flattens all the symlinks.
Nope, ccache doesn't flatten any symlinks when hashing the compiler name.
-- Joel
___
ccache mailing list
On 2012-06-11 07:54, Eric Blau wrote:
On 2012-06-10 16:09, Joel Rosdahl wrote:
> My suggestion is that get_relative_path essentially should stay the
> same and continue to assume that the paths are well-formed and
> canonical. make_relative_path (the only caller of get_relative_path)
> should can
On 11 July 2012 14:42, Max Horn wrote:
> On 11.07.2012, at 02:34, Martin Pool wrote:
>> If you are compiling from a .i or .ii file, the -D and -I options can't
>> have any effect. It's reasonable for clang to emit a warning about it, and
>> it would be reasonable for ccache to strip those options
