Hello. Sure, that name is an apt one and I'm glad saved a few seconds :) Regards, venkrao
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 12:54 AM, Joel Rosdahl <j...@rosdahl.net> wrote: > Hi, > > I'm not opposed to introducing such an option. What would be a good name? > CCACHE_READONLY_DIRECT (readonly_direct in the config file on master)? > > -- Joel > > > On 10 September 2014 09:57, Andrew Stubbs <a...@codesourcery.com> wrote: >> >> On 10/09/14 08:24, vkr wrote: >>> >>> Why is that? I mean, when drop preprocessing only when an env variable is >>> set, >>> why is it not the right approach? >> >> >> The development sources on the master branch has all-new option and >> environment variable processing code. >> >> The part where you act on the option is probably in the right place, but >> it ought to be read elsewhere. I'm not sure how that worked in 3.1.9. >> >> >> Andrew >> _______________________________________________ >> ccache mailing list >> ccache@lists.samba.org >> https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/ccache > > _______________________________________________ ccache mailing list ccache@lists.samba.org https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/ccache