On 01 Dec 2015 21:59, Anders Björklund wrote:
> Pierre Tardy made a PR (https://github.com/jrosdahl/ccache/pull/30)
> to replace the filesystem ("fs") cache with memcached altogether.
>
> We have gone with a different approach, to use memcached only as a
> secondary cache - while preserving the
>
>
> i don't think getting rid out of the fs makes sense, but having memcache
> be available dynamically as an additional layer sounds fine.
>
It does make a lot of sense for me as I have a high performance network,
which is faster than local harddrive. So I would insist on keeping an
option for
Pierre Tardy wrote:
>
> i don't think getting rid out of the fs makes sense, but having memcache
> be available dynamically as an additional layer sounds fine.
>
> It does make a lot of sense for me as I have a high performance network,
> which is faster than local harddrive. So I would
