On Thursday 26 of June 2014, Paul Smith wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-06-26 at 18:44 +0200, Lubos Lunak wrote:
> > Caveats:
> > - Compiles with and without colors are considered different from each
> > other (so they are "duplicated").
>
> This doesn't seem ideal
es.
>
> When extracting the compiler name, I suggest using basename() from util.c.
> That way it will work on Windows as well.
Attached is an updated patch that passes also all the tests.
--
Lubos Lunak
From b466ec1fde17ff72989a39c51fbe3f1c68284967 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-
On Friday 29 of November 2013, Lubos Lunak wrote:
> Hello,
>
> the attached patch adds ccache support for compiler color diagnostics
> (also reported by somebody as #10075).
Ping? Any "official" comments on the patch? I've been using the patch for
half a y
nexpected that ccache would change
> the compiler's warning behavior?
Use CCACHE_CPP2 when using ccache with clang (see e.g.
http://www.mail-archive.com/ccache@lists.samba.org/msg01045.html).
--
Lubos Lunak
___
ccache mailing list
ccache@lists.samba.org
https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/ccache
see colours).
>
> With that patch, I don't see the colours in auto mode. It only works in
> always mode.
I see. How about this patch?
--
Lubos Lunak
From cacb14929748ae93eacefcfa194aa93689d217eb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Lubo=C5=A1=20Lu=C5=88=C3=A1k?=
Date: Fri, 29
On Wednesday 12 of February 2014, Ryan Hill wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Nov 2013 12:39:25 +0100
>
> Lubos Lunak wrote:
> > Clang automatically uses colors for output automatically if used in
> > terminal. Ccache's redirecting to a file disables this. GCC 4.8 has got a
> >
Ping?
On Friday 29 of November 2013, Lubos Lunak wrote:
> Hello,
>
> the attached patch adds ccache support for compiler color diagnostics
> (also reported by somebody as #10075).
>
> Clang automatically uses colors for output automatically if used in
> terminal. Ccac
On Saturday 30 of November 2013, Loïc Yhuel wrote:
> Le 30/11/2013 11:07, Lubos Lunak a écrit :
> > On Saturday 30 of November 2013, Loïc Yhuel wrote:
> >> Le 29/11/2013 14:08, Lubos Lunak a écrit :
> >>> On Friday 29 of November 2013, Lubos Lunak wrote:
> &g
On Saturday 30 of November 2013, Loïc Yhuel wrote:
> Le 29/11/2013 14:08, Lubos Lunak a écrit :
> > On Friday 29 of November 2013, Lubos Lunak wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> the attached patch adds ccache support for compiler color diagnostics
> >> (
e common and why have
the overhead of running cpp for a minority of hits). I could give this a
shot, but I don't know if there isn't some design problem making this
difficult/impossible.
--
Lubos Lunak
___
ccache mailing list
ccache@lists.samba.org
https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/ccache
On Friday 29 of November 2013, Lubos Lunak wrote:
> Hello,
>
> the attached patch adds ccache support for compiler color diagnostics
> (also reported by somebody as #10075).
...
> Caveats:
I forgot one:
- The function color_output_possible() may look simplistic, but as far as
te manpage section for this color support, but I first wanted
to check here with the code.
--
Lubos Lunak
From d4284a161e733a68ad1c1c84d124d81d3c627db8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Lubo=C5=A1=20Lu=C5=88=C3=A1k?=
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 12:14:03 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] support compile
On Tuesday 08 of January 2013, Joel Rosdahl wrote:
> > Could you please include that commit as well? Thank you.
>
> I've applied it to maint now, so it will be included in 3.1.10. Please
> try if current maint works like you expect.
Yes, now maint indeed works as well, thank
soon, but even though it's been included in 3.1.9, that ccache version
still sees such compiles as 'multiple source files', because it requires
8e005b067d8c2423e24ee14ffdee8343f650f1e8 too. Could you please include that
commit as well? Thank you.
--
Hello,
please review and push the attached patch, which adds Clang plugins to the
hash, similarly as is already done with GCC plugins.
--
Lubos Lunak
l.lu...@suse.cz
From 11b35610cf97b1540dc883b03e7ce059735bd04c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Lubos Lunak
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 14:45:16
On Friday 13 of July 2012, Lubos Lunak wrote:
> If somebody would feel like playing with this, note that Clang 3.2 will
> have -E -Wp,-rewrite-includes,
Make that -E -frewrite-includes, looks like upstream has changed that.
> which only processes #include directives and
> not
On Thursday 12 of July 2012, Joel Rosdahl wrote:
> On 6 July 2012 19:09, Lubos Lunak wrote:
> > the attached patches modify ccache to also support Clang PCH in addition
> > to GCC PCH.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Regarding 0002-hash-clang-s-.pch-file-explicitly.patch: Why i
ng
suppressed or error/warning messages quoting modified source code. As a
side-effect, this problem with preprocessor options will not exist with
CCACHE_CPP2 either. It is a question how much not using CCACHE_CPP2 with
Clang would improve performance anyway.
--
Lubos Lunak
l.lu...@suse.cz
___
ccache mailing list
ccache@lists.samba.org
https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/ccache
s are affected, some warnings are not supressed in
headers).
--
Lubos Lunak
l.lu...@suse.cz
From 768ffacb434d116759fc73cf0d2723aba6b5af4c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Lubo=C5=A1=20Lu=C5=88=C3=A1k?=
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2012 18:09:36 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] support for precompiled headers
19 matches
Mail list logo
