Re: [ccache] why is limit_multiple ignored?

2018-01-29 Thread Joel Rosdahl via ccache
On 29 January 2018 at 07:14, Scott Bennett wrote: > Countless data base software implementations handle these situations > acceptably well. Sigh. I see. You're talking about a completely different model than what ccache currently uses, which was not clear to me when I read

Re: [ccache] why is limit_multiple ignored?

2018-01-16 Thread Joel Rosdahl via ccache
On 7 January 2018 at 14:02, Scott Bennett wrote: > The design problem is that there is no centralized index maintained of > cache entries' paths, their sizes, and their timestamps, necessitating > the plumbing of the directory trees. [...] Thanks for sharing your ideas! I fully agree that the

Re: [ccache] why is limit_multiple ignored?

2018-01-07 Thread Scott Bennett via ccache
Joel Rosdahl wrote: > On 19 December 2017 at 02:16, Scott Bennett via ccache < > ccache@lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi Joel, Sorry about the delay in responding. I've been off-line for about a week and a half and may be again shortly. > > I set "limit_multiple =

Re: [ccache] why is limit_multiple ignored?

2018-01-04 Thread Joel Rosdahl via ccache
Hi Scott, On 19 December 2017 at 02:16, Scott Bennett via ccache < ccache@lists.samba.org> wrote: > I set "limit_multiple = 0.95" in ccache.conf and "max_size = 30.0G" > in ccache.conf, but cleanups are triggered when space usage reaches 24 GB, > which is the default of 0.8. Why is this