On 11/08/2011 01:49 PM, Joel Rosdahl wrote:
On 5 November 2011 01:26, Frank Klotzfrank.kl...@alcatel-lucent.com wrote:
[...] I remember quite clearly (and I just confirmed with a colleague who is
still there) that the file names in the cache contained BOTH the hash AND the
basename of the
On 2011-12-20 20:09, Frank Klotz wrote:
Suggestion: Put the below 2-line solution in the Corrupt object
files section of http://ccache.samba.org/manual.html [...] It's a LOT
lighter-weight solution than clearing the cache, and much easier than
messing with the log.
Good suggestion. I'll do
On 11/08/2011 11:08 PM, Joel Rosdahl wrote:
On 8 November 2011 23:18, Frank Klotzfrank.kl...@alcatel-lucent.com wrote:
On 11/08/2011 01:49 PM, Joel Rosdahl wrote:
It doesn't sound like a good idea to me, at least, since you would need to
store duplicate copies of the object file for two
On 9 November 2011 18:46, Frank Klotz frank.kl...@alcatel-lucent.com wrote:
On 11/08/2011 11:08 PM, Joel Rosdahl wrote:
I don't think you can in an acceptable way find an existing file to reuse
when you're about to store a new file -- you'll have to list the directory
and iterate through its
On 5 November 2011 01:26, Frank Klotz frank.kl...@alcatel-lucent.com wrote:
[...] I remember quite clearly (and I just confirmed with a colleague who is
still there) that the file names in the cache contained BOTH the hash AND the
basename of the object file.
As far as I know, the object files
