On Sunday, May 16, 2010, Joel Rosdahl wrote:
On 2010-05-12 15:52, Bernhard Bauer wrote:
attached are some patches needed to make compiling under Mac OS X with
Xcode/distcc work.
Thanks!
0001-Add-Objective-C-to-the-mapping-from-source-files-to-.patch
Sure. Applied.
0002-Add
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 05:27, Bernhard Bauer bau...@google.com wrote:
On Sunday, May 16, 2010, Joel Rosdahl wrote:
On 2010-05-12 15:52, Bernhard Bauer wrote:
attached are some patches needed to make compiling under Mac OS X with
Xcode/distcc work.
Thanks!
0001-Add-Objective-C
, Bernhard Bauer bau...@google.com wrote:
Hi Joel,
I finally got around to rewriting the third patch. I added a special
case to process_args that matches distcc's behavior (if the first
argument to distcc is neither a source/object file nor an option, it's
treated as the compiler).
You can find
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 18:38, Joel Rosdahl j...@rosdahl.net wrote:
On 2010-06-11 15:18, Bernhard Bauer wrote:
I finally got around to rewriting the third patch. I added a special
case to process_args that matches distcc's behavior (if the first
argument to distcc is neither a source/object
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 22:32, Joel Rosdahl j...@rosdahl.net wrote:
I see. distcc 2.18.3 (the oldest release I can find on distcc.org) seems
to know about .mi/.mii. Do you think it's acceptable to upgrade to a
newer distcc to fix this? It would be nice to avoid having a workaround
for older
Hi guys,
what is the current state of ccache together with distcc pump mode?
I'd assume that direct mode cache hits would go nicely with pump mode,
but for cache misses we would still need to run the preprocessor
locally to calculate the hash for the manifest file, which would ruin
the benefit of
