Hello Joel,
> https://www.mail-archive.com/ccache@lists.samba.org/msg00802.html
Thank you. It is trickier than I thought.
> ccache has a test suite and it fails like this with your patch:
Sorry, I missed the test directory. Attached is a modified patch, which
fixes this issue and includes
Hi Andreas,
> [...] I understand that it makes
> sense to make the current working directory canonic, but I do not
> see why this done for the path given to `make_relative_path`. Is
> it really necessary?
Some background can be found in this mail thread:
> Seems like a pretty niche use case, but if you can come up with a
> patch that doesn't break too much of current behaviour - why not.
Thank you for considering it. A patch is in the attachment.
> Worst case, it could be an option (that defaulted to false) ?
I would not consider this the
Andreas Wettstein wrote:
> In function `make_relative_path` (file `ccache.c`), the given
> path is made "canonic" before it is converted to a path relative
> to the current working directory. In particular, "canonic" means
> that symbolic links are removed. I understand that it makes
> sense to
In function `make_relative_path` (file `ccache.c`), the given
path is made "canonic" before it is converted to a path relative
to the current working directory. In particular, "canonic" means
that symbolic links are removed. I understand that it makes
sense to make the current working directory
