Re: [ccache] Ccache and cross compilers
On 9 July 2012 19:35, Richard Maw wrote: > However if you use ccache via a symlink it may use realpath, which I > think flattens all the symlinks. Nope, ccache doesn't flatten any symlinks when hashing the compiler name. -- Joel ___ ccache mailing list ccache@lists.samba.org https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/ccache
Re: [ccache] Ccache and cross compilers
On 9 July 2012 19:06, DATACOM - Samuel Lucas wrote: > [...] > I'm wondering if it's safe to use a single ccache directory for both > architectures or I must use separated directories for each architecture. The > compiler's mtime, size and content are the same for both. > > Does anyone knows if ccache uses also the compiler name for the hash? Does > it follow symbolic links for that? Yes, ccache includes the compiler name in the hash (this is also mentioned in the manual: http://ccache.samba.org/manual.html#_common_hashed_information), so it should be safe to use the same ccache directory for both architectures. Symlinks are not followed. -- Joel ___ ccache mailing list ccache@lists.samba.org https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/ccache
Re: [ccache] Ccache and cross compilers
On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 02:06:00PM -0300, DATACOM - Samuel Lucas wrote: > Does anyone knows if ccache uses also the compiler name for the > hash? Does it follow symbolic links for that? >From a look at the source code, it does hash the basename. However if you use ccache via a symlink it may use realpath, which I think flattens all the symlinks. ___ ccache mailing list ccache@lists.samba.org https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/ccache
