Den 2018-01-29 kl. 18:59, skrev Joel Rosdahl via ccache:
> On 29 January 2018 at 07:14, Scott Bennett wrote:
>
>> Countless data base software implementations handle these situations
>> acceptably well.
>
> Sigh.
>
> I see. You're talking about a completely different model than what
> ccache cu
On 29 January 2018 at 07:14, Scott Bennett wrote:
> Countless data base software implementations handle these situations
> acceptably well.
Sigh.
I see. You're talking about a completely different model than what
ccache currently uses, which was not clear to me when I read your
initial descript
Joel Rosdahl wrote:
> On 7 January 2018 at 14:02, Scott Bennett wrote:
>
> > The design problem is that there is no centralized index maintained of
> > cache entries' paths, their sizes, and their timestamps, necessitating
> > the plumbing of the directory trees. [...]
>
> Thanks for sharing your
On 7 January 2018 at 14:02, Scott Bennett wrote:
> The design problem is that there is no centralized index maintained of
> cache entries' paths, their sizes, and their timestamps, necessitating
> the plumbing of the directory trees. [...]
Thanks for sharing your ideas!
I fully agree that the cl
Joel Rosdahl wrote:
> On 19 December 2017 at 02:16, Scott Bennett via ccache <
> ccache@lists.samba.org> wrote:
>
Hi Joel,
Sorry about the delay in responding. I've been off-line for about a
week and a half and may be again shortly.
> > I set "limit_multiple = 0.95" in ccache.con
Hi Scott,
On 19 December 2017 at 02:16, Scott Bennett via ccache <
ccache@lists.samba.org> wrote:
> I set "limit_multiple = 0.95" in ccache.conf and "max_size = 30.0G"
> in ccache.conf, but cleanups are triggered when space usage reaches 24 GB,
> which is the default of 0.8. Why is this hap
