Hi ,
I got a strange problem when trying to install ivr license file , anybody
face this before ?
Downloading ftp cue-vm-license_4port_ivr_7.0.3.pkg
Bytes downloaded : 3319
Validating package signature ... done
compatibility mode
Validating installed manifests .complete.
The system
Hello all,
I am sorry - I have tried to keep up with the emails here but I am confused.
Let's say I have bought the BLS and I have now here with me at home the
"old" v2.0 HDD of the BLS (which is the case here).
Now - the product gets updated - and the new VOD should come out "soon"
And there is a
The VOD is done, technically - but we're working on the menu and
creation of the final product (final edits / production). It will
probably be shipping much sooner, but I don't want to give a date that
we can't hit. ;-)
Regards,
Wayne A. Lawson II - CCIE #5244
Founder, President & CEO:
- IP
Jonathan,
We have 2 workbooks - Volume 1 and Volume 2 - not "versions",
but Volumesre-read the question.
Regards,
Wayne A. Lawson II - CCIE #5244
Founder, President & CEO:
- IPexpert, Inc.
- Proctor Labs, Inc.
- Platinum Solutions Group, LLC.
Mailto: wlaw...@ipexpert.com
Mobile: +1.8
What do you mean it is not free if you bought volume 1?
What about those of us who bought the BLS for v2?
Do we need to pay for an upgrade?
Jonathan
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 8:21 PM, Wayne Lawson wrote:
> Alex -
>
> Volume 2 already has 2 labs available, but it's not free if
> you've boug
ahh I see thanks for clarification!
-Original Message-
From: Jonathan Charles [mailto:jonv...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, 1 August 2009 2:12 PM
To: Aamir Panjwani
Cc: Brian Valentine; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Thoughts on V3
Please do not assume you w
Please do not assume you will get the same feedback... I got this
because I had a potential hardware fault and it turned out I caused
the problem.
Jonathan
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 6:36 PM, Aamir
Panjwani wrote:
> Jonathan, the most interesting bit of this entire thread is that Ben Ng sent
> you
If waiting for 2 more weeks means we get the best, most complete product
then I'm all for that. I'd rather not try and rush the IPX guys or hassle
them to get it sooner if any aspect of the product (or service) suffers.
On that note, I'm still hoping for that download option.. *pretty please?*
:)
Wayne, VOD will be shipping in 2 weeks? Mark said earlier this week VOD
will be available for shipping this coming Monday?
-Original Message-
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Wayne
Lawson
Sent: Saturday, 1 August 20
Afraid not! I think my receptor is broken..
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 7:29 PM, Vik Malhi wrote:
> You didn’t get the telepathic slides?
> --
> Vik Malhi – CCIE #13890
> Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.
>
> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
> Fax: +1.810.454.0130
> Mailto: *vma...@ipexpert.co
You didn¹t get the telepathic slides?
--
Vik Malhi CCIE #13890
Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.
Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
Fax: +1.810.454.0130
Mailto: vma...@ipexpert.com
Join our free online support and peer group communities:
http://www.IPexpert.com/communities
IPexpert - The G
Hi,
I tried to configure the Extn Mobilty for CME but after login, it
continlusly shows me update profile .
I don't see the Phone Extn.
Has this worked for you all,Let me know.
telephony-service
max-ephones 4
max-dn 5 no-reg
ip source-address 10.10.110.3 port 2000
auto assign 1 to 2
auto as
when will v3 voice lab book 2 be completed and cost if known
Respectfully Charles George
From: groupst...@ipexpert.com
To: tanner.ez...@gmail.com
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 21:53:34 -0400
CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com; alex.han...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Volume 2 workbook
You're welcome! ;-)
Regards,
Wayne A. Lawson II - CCIE #5244
Founder, President & CEO:
- IPexpert, Inc.
- Proctor Labs, Inc.
- Platinum Solutions Group, LLC.
Mailto: wlaw...@ipexpert.com
Mobile: +1.810.334.1564
:: Message sent from iPhone.
On Jul 31, 2009, at 9:31 PM, Tanner Ezell
wrote:
I concur. Especially during the Gatekeeper training. Mark refers to "the
slide" quite a bit. I'm very excited about the audio training being a
separate product. Can't wait to load it into my IPOD and transfer it to my
brain.
Keep up the good work. Maybe I'll be ready for my November lab at
"Audio in about 6 weeks (audio will be a completely different product than
the VOD)."
I have to say I'm very happy to hear that Wayne! I was somewhat disappointed
when I discovered the audio lectures were just the VOD audio portion!
As always, thanks and keep being great :)
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 a
Alex -
Volume 2 already has 2 labs available, but it's not free if
you've bought Volume 1 (we have 2 different books - 1 & 2). The VOD
will be shipping in 2 weeks, Audio in about 6 weeks (audio will be a
completely different product than the VOD). Please reference our blog
for update
Vik or Mark,
Just out of curiousity when will volume 2 be out? If we purchased
version 1 workbook and proctor guide are we entitled to volume 2 as a
download? Also are the audio and videos being updated as well? Any
eta on those?
Thanks a bunch...
Alex
Sent from my iPhone
_
Jonathan, the most interesting bit of this entire thread is that Ben Ng sent
you an email with explanation of why you failed!! CCIE exam is notorious for
not telling you exactly where you lost points. So this must be a massive help
for you. By the way is that some kind of a new process that ever
Good post.
I had a co-worker that passed the V2 lab about a year ago and he was
disappointed that half of the technology was outdated.
He was a systems engineer for a major Cisco partner.
T
Thomas J Koch
Owner/Consultant
Digitones, LLC
Cell: 630-808-4910
E-mail: digito...@comcast.net
__
Well at least you have the evidence for safe keeping:-)
Vik Malhi - CCIE#13890
Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert Inc
Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
Fax: +1.810.454.0130
Mailto: vma...@ipexpert.com
Join IPexpert's Free CCIE Peer Groups & Study Communities at
www.IPexpert.com/communities
On Jul
Not a rat.
However, they know who they are... and the post made them leave me alone.
J
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 5:41 PM, Olayemi
Salau wrote:
> If I were you, I will list the names of the dumps seekers! God no wonder
> Cisco moved swiftly to add 30mins qualifying exams before the lab itself.
>
Well, after reading the CCIE Blog and seeing what is going to be added
in 9 months or so scares the crap out of me, DNS, AD, SIP providers,
and god knows what else (security?)...
The test is much easier now than it will be... I can see a Presence
question telling you to integrate it with an offnet
If I were you, I will list the names of the dumps seekers! God no
wonder Cisco moved swiftly to add 30mins qualifying exams before the
lab itself.
Guys, get back to ur labs and stop pestering Jon, it makes me sick!
Honestly, I've had to turn on my daily digest because of this :)
On 31 Jul 2
The v2 exam, in the end, had become absurd. I remember when I was studying
for it that it felt like the v2 practical was testing the candidate on how
to take a test. The ATA focus was rediculous. An extrememly light argument
could be made for the 6608, but not the CatOS, sorry. When it was anno
Nice post Tim.
4.02 T1/E1 CAS
Vik: Not in the works for the time being
4.07 IP-IP Gateway/CUBE
Vik: Vol 2 lab #1 covers this
10.01 L2 Traffic Classifications and Policing
10.02 L2 Queuing Mechanisms
10.03 L2 LFI
Vik: L2 LFI covered in vol 1 and in every vol 2 lab release so far. L2
queueing/clas
I would recommend people sit the lab sooner rather than later. The shape of
the exam in its present state versus 6 9 months will be very different. As
the lab matures variation will increase and inevitably it will be more
difficult.
This is all idle Friday afternoon speculation off course.
--
Oh, ok :-)
-Original Message-
From: Jonathan Charles [mailto:jonv...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, July 31, 2009 1:41 PM
To: Jason Granat
Cc: Vik Malhi; OSL Group
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Thoughts on V3
This was not even slightly directed at you...
I got at least 30 emails privately as
This was not even slightly directed at you...
I got at least 30 emails privately asking me for a point by point
braindump of the exam.
Jonathan
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 3:31 PM, Jason Granat wrote:
> I just asked how the IPExpert workbooks compared. I wasn't asking for
> specifics. Sorry if I o
Cisco provides a Telco router that we will not have access to. Is it
possible that they could have an AD/DNS server, which we would not have
access to? Isn't it possible that they could have a preconfigured AD/DNS
server that we need to utilize for CUPS/CUPC integration?
UCCX runs LDAP and s
I know, in way too much detail, why I failed... I got an email from
Ben Ng explaining it.
Jonathan
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 3:25 PM, Brian Valentine wrote:
> I don't know what we expect Jonathan to tell us. What we really want to ask
> is something we don't really want to know and something he r
Honestly, it isn't that bad...
Most of the information from version 2 applies to version 3, a quick
look at the blueprint will prove that out...
Yes, the hardware changed, and some of it made life easier, some of it
makes life harder...
Yes, there are traps set up for you (where config in questi
Vik - A while ago I lined up the Volume 1 workbook with the blueprint. I
highlighted these topics for further studying.
4.02 T1/E1 CAS
4.07 IP-IP Gateway/CUBE
10.01 L2 Traffic Classifications and Policing
10.02 L2 Queuing Mechanisms
10.03 L2 LFI
12.03 Redundancy (CCX)
I've touched most of them,
I just asked how the IPExpert workbooks compared. I wasn't asking for
specifics. Sorry if I offended you.
-Original Message-
From: Jonathan Charles [mailto:jonv...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, July 31, 2009 1:29 PM
To: Vik Malhi
Cc: Jason Granat; OSL Group
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Thou
Your welcome, though I would like to reply to the entire group:
Stop asking me what is specifically on the test.
I am not going to tell you
Jonathan
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 2:01 PM, Vik Malhi wrote:
> Thanks for sharing the info Jonathan.
>
> From what we heard at networkers during the t
I don't know what we expect Jonathan to tell us. What we really want to ask
is something we don't really want to know and something he really can't tell
us anyway because of NDA.
Jonathan, bummer that you failed. It sounds like you know why you failed --
which is a very good thing. Better luc
Hopefully we all don't want a braindump from Johnathan. I think that's what
caused Cisco to create more and more puzzling questions. A technical test
became a riddle. I was expecting Batman and Robin to show up next if the test
didn't change soon. I think it's just a curiosity to see how bad
Has anyone taken the v3 LAB IN RTP?
Thomas J Koch
Owner/Consultant
Digitones, LLC
Cell: 630-808-4910
E-mail: digito...@comcast.net
-Original Message-
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Jonathan
Charles
Sent: Friday, J
Hi Guys,
When I'm doing the task for B-acd on LAB9, Bacd doesn't work for IP phones
registered with CME but works for calls from PSTN & CUCM.
Any clue guys did it work with you'll.
Thanks,
Oliver
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE
Thanks for sharing the info Jonathan.
>From what we heard at networkers during the techtorial we believe we are
missing a few technologies too and we have been working hard to incorporate
anything that is currently lacking into our WB.
I don't want to be cryptic and it is unfair to ask DIRECT que
Makes me want to try the exam earlier, but I'm going to stick to my plan.
December is re-take of one-week lab experience and I'm targeting for February
for the exam. Small risk of AD/DNS/VPIM being put back on the exam by that
time, but so what? AD makes CUP EASIER. VPIM is no big deal.
Yea
Thanks for that last bit of info. I will be sure to work on the [deleted by
NDA] topics. Those are my weak areas.
Thanks,
Kevin
-Original Message-
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Jonathan Charles
Sent: Friday, J
Not yet but this is apparently in the works...
J
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 1:08 PM, c george wrote:
> is what we have haere from IPEXPERT enough to conquer this version of the
> lab
>
> Respectfully Charles George
>
>
>
>> Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 13:04:30 -0500
>> From: jonv...@gmail.com
>> To:
No, this was specific to me making a remarkably stupid mistake and
them verifying it was me and not them.
Jonathan
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 1:07 PM, Bill Talley wrote:
> Here's a question unrelated to the exam content.
>
>
> Was there anything evident from Ben's email that would indicate everyon
Thanks! This is actually very good to hear! Have you gone through the Vol2 labs
yet to see if they are more 'complete'? :-)
-Original Message-
From: Jonathan Charles [mailto:jonv...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, July 31, 2009 11:06 AM
To: Jason Granat
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject
Its good to know Jonathan and we wish you luck on your next attempt
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 11:08 AM, Jonathan Charles wrote:
> If you have implemented CUPS, CUCM, CUCCX, etc, before you will have
> NO problems with the open ended questions... the IPExpert questions
> were orders of magnitude har
is what we have here from IPEXPERT enough to conquer this version of the lab
Respectfully Charles George
> Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 13:04:30 -0500
> From: jonv...@gmail.com
> To: lakpr...@gmail.com
> CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Thoughts on V3
>
> It was
If you have implemented CUPS, CUCM, CUCCX, etc, before you will have
NO problems with the open ended questions... the IPExpert questions
were orders of magnitude harder than the actual questions...
To give an example of the kind of question:
"where would you go in CUCM to specify the default auto
is what we have haere from IPEXPERT enough to conquer this version of the lab
Respectfully Charles George
> Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 13:04:30 -0500
> From: jonv...@gmail.com
> To: lakpr...@gmail.com
> CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Thoughts on V3
>
> It wa
The Volume 1 workbook was good, but was missing something very
important (perhaps, sort of... could be, maybe) which will
supposedly be in volume 2...
Jonathan
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 12:38 PM, Jason Granat wrote:
> Maybe you could give us your opinion on how much you think the IPExpert
>
hehe :)
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 11:05 AM, Jonathan Charles wrote:
> Well, the [deleted by NDA] was [deleted by NDA] than I expected, but
> [deleted by NDA] was [deleted by NDA] and [deleted by NDA] was also
> [deleted by NDA]
>
>
> Jonathan
>
> On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 12:33 PM, Tanner Ezell
> wro
Well, I appreciate the feedback. The V2 exam was renown for its
frustrations. I'm happy to hear that v3 is a test of knowledge and skill.
I decided to wait until V3 so that I didn't have to deal with studying
techniques that are irrelevant in the real world, like esoteric knowledge of
ATA hex cod
Well, the [deleted by NDA] was [deleted by NDA] than I expected, but
[deleted by NDA] was [deleted by NDA] and [deleted by NDA] was also
[deleted by NDA]
Jonathan
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 12:33 PM, Tanner Ezell wrote:
> So basically, you had thoughts, but can't share, and you did things, but you
The "easier" and "remarkably fair portion" is GREAT information, especially for
this early in the game.
He could of said "I'm lucky to have gotten 10 points. No way, good luck
suckers." He could have said, it's harder than IPExpert Lab 5.
Were the open ended questions fair?
Thanks for the in
It was, indeed, a part of the lab, to an extent that may or may not be
measurable...
Seriously, don't ask me specifics.
J
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 12:26 PM, Ravindra Lakpriya wrote:
> HI Jonathan,
> How was the CUPS part of the Lab ??
>
> On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 10:51 PM, Jonathan Charles
> wrot
So basically, you had thoughts, but can't share, and you did things, but you
cannot tell us
So all in all,
:)
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 10:21 AM, Jonathan Charles wrote:
> OK, I took it monday in San Jose and failed (got a nice email from Ben
> Ng telling me why...)
>
> It was actually easier tha
HI Jonathan,
How was the CUPS part of the Lab ??
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 10:51 PM, Jonathan Charles wrote:
> OK, I took it monday in San Jose and failed (got a nice email from Ben
> Ng telling me why...)
>
> It was actually easier than I thought it was going to be... and
> remarkably fair...
>
>
OK, I took it monday in San Jose and failed (got a nice email from Ben
Ng telling me why...)
It was actually easier than I thought it was going to be... and
remarkably fair...
I made a mistake that broke something and that is the primary reason I
didn't pass (no, I cannot tell you what the mistak
to be out today?
>
>
>
> Also, if those of us with pre-existing BLS are not entitled to the new
>
> material, how do we go about getting the upgrade?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Jonathan
>
> ___
>
> For more information r
d...
URL:
http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_voice/attachments/20090731/a85
c44bb/attachment-0001.htm
--
Message: 3
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 10:45:11 -0400
From: smael
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Volume 2 and Videos?
To: Jason Granat , Jonathan Charles
Are there any other free IP phone products out there that we can use
that will be Gen 2 IP phones, similar to the IP blue Gen 1 7960 IP
phones? Thanks
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit
www.ipexpert.com
___
http://slash128.com
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_voice/attachments/20090731/a85c44b
b/attachment-0001.htm
--
Message: 3
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 10:45:11 -0400
hi,
i have done some cups labs.
here my readings on it
1. we can do without AD
2. we cannot do without DNS. Casue DNS = SIP = DNS. Since we are purly working
on sip stack i see we need this for presence to work properly
i have made a video on integration which i will be posting on my blog
Yeah, I don't think we need to be stressed about this. I received the BLS
material last year (all the V2 stuff), and like clockwork have had access to
all the updated workbooks as they were released. There's no need to panic,
they'll deliver.
It's gonna be awesome!!!
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 4:45
Correct. 79X1 does not support ILBC.
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 11:02 PM, Michael
Ciarfello wrote:
> Hi Chris,
> I am pretty sure the x1 phones can USE g722 (turn on advertise g722 codec.
> Might need to do a couple other things.) You just won't be able to HEAR the
> g722 quality unless you have
I hope those of us that purchased the old BLS are entitled to the new material
until we pass:
http://www.ipexpert.com/Guarantee
This is one of the big reasons I use IPExpert (that and of course they rock :))
-Original Message-
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailt
I purchased the latest BLS for V3 lab by the June 30th, 2009 deadline, but
it came loaded with the older version.
It should be a supported upgrade
On 7/31/09 10:39 AM, "Jason Granat" wrote:
> I hope those of us that purchased the old BLS are entitled to the new material
> until we pass:
>
Were they supposed to be out today?
Also, if those of us with pre-existing BLS are not entitled to the new
material, how do we go about getting the upgrade?
Jonathan
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit
Thanks Jeff, very interesting indeed, as you said the key point is it's
not recommended but still achievable without AD/DNS. The question is how
? J Perhaps other people on this forum may contribute their findings? As
AD/DNS won't be available in the real lab, it would be quite a challenge
to compl
Aamir, the only way I was able to get presence/IM working was to setup AD/DNS.
I was never able to get it working without. I also found a pretty good book on
CUPS which has some really good troubleshooting tips. BTW, this book says CUP
without AD is not recommended. Does not say it won't wor
70 matches
Mail list logo
