Did you assign an IP address to the box after the install?
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 21:28:30 +1000
From: jeremy.coo...@gmail.com
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com; cisco-v...@puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] uccx node manager terminated unexpectedly by NT authority
Hi,
Running UCCX 7.0
Why not make the final in your hunt groups the pilot for the next hunt group?
Jonathan
On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 11:10 PM, dave menkmenk...@hotmail.com wrote:
Can I setup BACD so that I can hunt from one hunt group to another hunt
group? I have tried this using various methods and no matter what
Yes, but no...
Technically, it is a purchased, licensed feature... however, if you
have access to the IOS, there is nothing stopping you from just
installing it on a router...
Jonathan
On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 2:04 PM, Mark Hollowaym...@markholloway.com wrote:
Does IOS 12.4.24(T) require a
Jonathan, did you manage to figure this out?
-Original Message-
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Jonathan
Charles
Sent: Sunday, 9 August 2009 8:00 AM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice]
Hi Jeremy
Unfortunately just this morning I had the same issue (and it was working fine
when i installed it yesterday). I am just in the middle of re-building my VM
and installing UCCX again. I couldn't see (or the shutdown timer didn't give
me enough time to troubleshoot) any other way of
I had the same problem. But it was OK after I reinstalled it from the scratch.
I believe its something to do with the OS patch.
--- On Mon, 8/10/09, Tanner Ezell tanner.ez...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Tanner Ezell tanner.ez...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] uccx node manager
Sorry, got another one. 9.1 (BACD)
The WB mentions the hunt group for 2 SCCP phones.
The PG wanted a hunt group for a SIP and SCCP phone (I like that one better.)
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Michael Ciarfello
Sent:
I don't remember exactly which one i installed but I'll check and let you know
tonight.
Thanks.
--- On Mon, 8/10/09, Stuart Geoghegan stuartmgeoghe...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
From: Stuart Geoghegan stuartmgeoghe...@yahoo.co.uk
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] uccx node manager terminated
I got the same thing but suspended the vm right before it requests the reboot
after the install was completed. If you install it and dont configure it with
CUCM it fails, i have done this with several versions I had, but the
newest version I stopped just short of configuring it in callmanager.
Just an FYI, I have UCCX 7.0(1)_Build109 running on 2003.1.2 with 0
problems.
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 7:26 AM, KatGuru gkr2...@yahoo.com wrote:
I don't remember exactly which one i installed but I'll check and let you
know tonight.
Thanks.
--- On Mon, 8/10/09, Stuart Geoghegan
(Shameless plug) You may find this video helpful
http://tannerezell.com/cisco/?p=164
It covers the installation of UCCX on both 2003 vanilla and Cisco OS 2003,
guides through the setup and configuration as well as a test script. It also
includes instructions for preparing UCM for UCCX.
I'd
/attachments/20090810/2455d3c9/attachment.html
--
Message: 2
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 07:32:14 -0700
From: Tanner Ezell tanner.ez...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] uccx node manager terminated
unexpectedly byNT authority
To: Gwenzit gwen...@yahoo.com
Cc
This was my third time around, twice with v2 now once with V3. Yes it
was very challenging but completely doable. The big thing was the items
that none of the prep material out there covers in-depth, including
Cisco own SRND (it makes a good start). Sort of got blindsided by those
items.
Some
maybe you should rephrase your comment alittle maybe?!
Respectfully Charles George
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 12:10:11 -0500
From: seanbda...@mavetech.com
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Impression of V3 - My two cents worth.
This was my third time around,
Look, I gotta say it. If you post NDA stuff, Cisco just makes the test harder
and harder. The end of the v2 run was DISGUSTING. It wasn't a test--it was a
puzzle. I might have done better with the nail puzzle or a Sudoku puzzle. I
might have done better finding the holy grail.
CUE with
That's why I'm not rushing to take the exam. We had one fellow last week
mention that he had passed the exam, but it was his 6th attempt, I imagine
his study habits changed quite a bit over time so I'm sure he's an exception
and not the rule.
No vendor is going to be up to speed on what's
Which part? I am completely disappointed with all the training
providers lack of prep for the new version. I do not see any thing in my
comment that is NDA. I have given no details and will not, I am just
saying there are technologies in the blue print that are not covered
fully in the
Yeah, sorry, Sean's right. And, btw, everyone knows about the NDA and he
didn't voilate it with material details. If that were the case, every
vendor would be violateing the NDA just by being in business as material
writers and teachers are expected to have taken the exam themselves. We're
I may be wrong havent attempted... but i think...no one can spoon feed
the #.. and yes der is diff with lot of things engineers are people who
maximise a given prob...within the given contraints if there was no
constraints , engineers would be an overkill.
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at
Okay...I'll play the part of a grandpa here although I'm not nearly
that old
Guys/Gals you are going to be blind-sided by something... expect that.
It's been my experience through the many Cisco tests I've taken that
to pass the lab...you are expected to be one part engineer, one part
My own feeling about this is;
1) Pass or fail, just like Jim said, we should be grateful for the age we
live in. I'm pretty sure that if I were born 100 years ago I would not be
doing anything constructive with my life. Today - tons of technology, all
of it is accessible. I can walk into a
https://www.ipexpert.com/index.cfm/product/sku/CCIE_Voice_Lab_Video_on_Deman
d_Series
Website was updated with apparently no announcement in the OSL. Unless I
missed something.
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of
Nope.
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 8:12 AM, Aamir
Panjwaniaamir.panjw...@ivision.com.au wrote:
Jonathan, did you manage to figure this out?
-Original Message-
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Jonathan
Charles
Am I reading the blog correctly? $25 to SHIP A DVD?! $50 TO MAKE ONE?!
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 11:03 AM, Larry Hadrava lar...@ipexpert.com wrote:
Hello All:
This was just posted on the IPexpert blog:
http://ipexpert.ccieblog.com/
CCIE *Security 3.0* CCIE *Voice 3.0* Clients,
I know
I presume that this will be available online for those of us who
already bought the product... the question is when and where...
J
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 6:36 PM, Brian Valentinebkvalent...@gmail.com wrote:
https://www.ipexpert.com/index.cfm/product/sku/CCIE_Voice_Lab_Video_on_Demand_Series
Of course I get .
UPGRADE ERROR
Our system does not recognize that you are eligible for this upgrade.
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Nara Shikamaru
Sent: Monday, August 10, 2009 7:41 PM
To: Larry Hadrava
Cc:
Yep I got the same error even though I am existing member
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Brian
Valentine
Sent: Tuesday, 11 August 2009 9:45 AM
To: 'Nara Shikamaru'
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re:
Yeah, I got that too...
Even though I am logged in and have full access to my downloads... and
it is $1499 for the upgrade? That seems a little high...
Jonathan
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 6:45 PM, Brian Valentinebkvalent...@gmail.com wrote:
Of course I get …
UPGRADE ERRORdd
Our system does
Where do you all see that error? I don't see anything :(
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 4:53 PM, Jonathan Charles jonv...@gmail.com wrote:
Yeah, I got that too...
Even though I am logged in and have full access to my downloads... and
it is $1499 for the upgrade? That seems a little high...
--
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_voice/attachments/20090810/ac85cca
a/attachment.htm
--
___
CCIE_Voice mailing list
CCIE_Voice@onlinestudylist.com
http
I never said the CUE/UCM was on the test it's just a spot that seams to
be lacking on the training material. It is something I would like to be
prepared for! I am not looking for a brain dump I am looking for
training on the stuff that those of use working for small partners will
never in the
I got the same error as well.
--- On Tue, 8/11/09, Aamir Panjwani aamir.panjw...@ivision.com.au wrote:
From: Aamir Panjwani aamir.panjw...@ivision.com.au
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Exciting Updates!
To: Brian Valentine bkvalent...@gmail.com, Nara Shikamaru
shikam...@kagadis.com
So am I to understand, this upgrade is not free to existing customers?
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 6:00 PM, KatGuru gkr2...@yahoo.com wrote:
I got the same error as well.
--- On Tue, 8/11/09, Aamir Panjwani aamir.panjw...@ivision.com.au wrote:
From: Aamir Panjwani aamir.panjw...@ivision.com.au
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_voice/attachments/20090810/ac85cca
a/attachment.htm
--
___
CCIE_Voice mailing list
CCIE_Voice
We were alerted via the blog (ipexpert.ccieblog.com). I think in the
last 10 posts Wayne said watch the blog J
Boils down to the upgrade is $75 for the DVD's and shipping. Due out on
or before 9/4. I think all of us are not seeing the Upgrade price yet.
I'm sure the blog will be updated
Michael,
Are you sure CUE/CUCM was covered in the v2 material? Which module?
Also, how would Proctorlabs accomodate this? You need to apply a specific
license file during installation of CUE to get it to work on either CUCM or
CME (can't do both, from what I've seen.)
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009
One week lab experience, lab 4. Not sure if proctorlabs could test it at the
time. Only logged in twice for CatOS QoS and vg248 stuff.
Yes, you have to change the license, (reinstall, whatever it was.)
No one said the CCIE exam can't integrate CCME with IPCCX, so maybe try that
also. That's
Has anyone gotten 9.2 working from a SIP phone? Doesn't recognize dtmf
keypresses.
BR2 SCCP phones work fine. PSTN phone works fine.
HQ phone over the GK trunk (SCCP or SIP) also doesn't recognize DTMF.
HQ calling a BR2 phone - no DTMF heard in handset
BR2 phone calling a HQ phone - DTMF
I can access the tcl from the PSTN. I have 2 vconsole simulators. 1 for PRI
and the other for POTS with 2 PRI ports that I connect to te PRI Simulator.
What I cannot do is call the TCL scripts internall from any phone. I have
everything configured correctly according to Cisoc and IPX. I
Wow, that's perfect, 2nd attempt (at v3, third attempt at ccie voice,
5th attempt at ccie overall...) is on 9/1...
J
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 8:33 PM, Steve Sarrickssarr...@drsllc.net wrote:
We were alerted via the blog (ipexpert.ccieblog.com). I think in the last
10 posts Wayne said watch
voip dial-peer not pots.
From: c george [cisco...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Monday, August 10, 2009 11:18 PM
To: Michael Ciarfello; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 9.2 - BACD from SIP phone -- dtmf relay problem
I can access the tcl from
my typo yes I meant VOIP dial-peer
is this working for you ?
Respectfully Charles George
From: mciarfe...@iplogic.com
To: cisco...@hotmail.com; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 23:24:45 -0400
Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 9.2 - BACD from SIP phone -- dtmf relay
All,
As promised here are the questions and my answers, and also since several list
members asked about strategy I’ve added a couple sections on both study and
lab. Finally I have included a lessons learned section. All of the following
is based on my experiences preparing for, and sitting
Thanks for that Art, very valuable insight!
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 8:52 PM, Art Sandborgh asandbo...@hotmail.comwrote:
All,
As promised here are the questions and my answers, and also since several
list members asked about strategy I’ve added a couple sections on both study
and lab.
44 matches
Mail list logo
