Matthew,
To address your first question, you can set the calling/called number type
in different places, ie, translation patterns, route patterns, route group
in route list configuration, called/calling tranformation pattern, gateway.
So depending on the call destination you can set a different
This is stating that the UC should not be able to 'loop' calls to itself.
In other words, a call to the Unity system does not get routed by unity such
that unity has to receive/answer the call again.
ie: a unity port being allowed to answer a call from another unity port.
Please see the
--
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_voice/attachments/20100114/1011a98
f/attachment-0001.htm
--
Message: 4
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 08:17:01 -0430
From: Otto Sanchez o...@ipexpert.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice
Hi Jeff,
Please send me the number that you can receive calls at and I can make some
test calls to your gw if you want.
Roger Källberg
Unified Communication Consultant
Cygate AB
From: Jeff Garvas [mailto:j...@cia.net]
Sent: den 14 januari 2010 06:41
To: Otto Sanchez
Cc: OSL Group
Subject: Re:
Hmmm I was under the impression that you can specify the Numbering Plan on
Route Pattern, Translation Pattern, Transformation Pattern and Route List/Group
only when using the special character '@' ( e.g. 9.@) but you cannot specify
the Numbering Type.
Jeff
From:
Hello,
Am working on Lab 2
how do i synchronize the uccx time to that of the callmanager or the
ntp(10.10.100.2)
thanks for the anticipated help
rgd
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit
www.ipexpert.com
Hello,
IN addition, the time on the control center is different from that on the
server time
thanks
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 4:03 PM, Omotayo adefilabi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Am working on Lab 2
how do i synchronize the uccx time to that of the callmanager or the
ntp(10.10.100.2)
Use windows time or xntp provided by Cisco.
Please see the link below for more info on time servers for UCXX.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cust_contact/contact_center/crs/express_5_0/maintenance/admin/crs501ag.pdf
Page 4-12; Modifying NTP Configuration
Thank you.
greg
Roger,
Thanks. Thats a great offer! Unfortunately I'd have to go turn on debug in
about four production gateways here each with numerous PRIs in them and hope
to read fast to catch it inbetween all of the other production calls.
I did the more obvious approach and found an example from the
hello,
i get that part.
the issue i have is that on the control center. the time is
January 14, 2010 10:27:51 AM EST
while on the server its is January 14, 2010 7:27:51 AM EST
the zone set on the server is gmt-8
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 4:16 PM, Pulos, Greg gpu...@doc.gov wrote:
Use windows
I'm working on Volume 1 Lab 4 - Gateways. I have a problem where my BR2 SIP
phone can call the BR1/HQ phones via the gatekeeper/gatekeeper trunk, but
when I answer the call on a BR1/HQ phone, it rings a couple more times and
then I get a reorder tone.
I can call successfully from the BR2 SCCP
honestly, its going to vary depending on your telco.
i know you were asking abotu caller ID from the PSTN, but this sorta
goes both ways. Generally speaking, sending 011 AND setting your
called party type to international doesn't make sense. 011 is the
international escape for USA - it tells the
Well, it seems to be giving me a failure of Reason: Q.850;cause=47
in the SIP 503 trace and in the Call Manager traces
wait_AuConnectErrorInd. The Cisco documentation is sort of vague:
Internal resource allocation failure 47
Typical scenarios include:
•Out of memory
•Internal access to the
Thanks Peter. I haven't had to deal with very many international calls in
our environment and I appreciate the real life example. I'm not just
studying for the lab but want to be able to understand the real life
implications of this as well.
You're saying you'd send the 443235235 with an
You're saying you'd send the 443235235 with an international type and the
011 could be discarded assuming the telco vendor accepted that? I bet our
international route patterns are sending the 011 and the telco runs with it
either way.
-jeff
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 12:16 PM, Peter
Hello Experts, i'm having a problem, i'm using proctors labs to practice,
i've configured mlppp between hq and branch 1 router, i used auto qos voip
fr-atm command and it was working fine, but i reload the Branch 1 router,
and the wan interface didn't come up again..
Virtual-Access1
Anyone from IPexpert can shed some light on this please
thx / /ak
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 5:05 PM, vccie2010 vccie2...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
- What are the SIP dial patterns to be configured for Q 2.3 page 53. I
can't find the those in the solution pls ??
- Page 75, we have crated TP to
hi all,
Does anyone know if we have to sit for first lab within 18 months exactly ? or
can be bit flexible , mean 1 or 2 weeks more than 18 months
As I tried to schedule for lab , and the system take it , even after 18 months
period
Thks for answer..
Rgs
They are NOT flexible. If it let u schedule it, it's a system glitch
and it will prob bite u in te rear.
Sent from my phone, apologies for any typos.
On Jan 14, 2010, at 3:21 PM, Erwan Erwan e_er...@yahoo.com wrote:
hi all,
Does anyone know if we have to sit for first lab within 18 months
Hi AK,
1.- There are not sip dial rules in the solutions as they will be needed in
the case there is a sip phone dialing from directory, and all the phones run
sccp load for this lab. Should the case is presented, you will have to
configure intl sip dial rules with + dialing in addition to all
Hello,
What phone load version/protocol is the phone you're trying to update?
Please check the following link to see the procedure on how to upgrade
phone's sip firmware and whether the current version can be directly
upgraded to your desired version,
On the downloaded files from IP Expert, I noticed in the folder Labeled
VOL2 configs, once unzipped and opened all the final config folders are
blank for LABS 1-4, LAB 5 does contain a final config, any reason for
this or is this just an oversite?.
Thanks
Larry
Jeff,
You are right, I was talking about Called/Calling Number Type, however, I
think Matthew was referring to Calling/Called Party Numbering Plan setting
(isdn, private, national standard, etc), or Numbering Plan Identification
(NPI) ISDN Setup Field, which I would set only if required by the
Thanks a million Otto for clarifying it.
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 3:37 PM, Otto Sanchez o...@ipexpert.com wrote:
Hi AK,
1.- There are not sip dial rules in the solutions as they will be needed in
the case there is a sip phone dialing from directory, and all the phones run
sccp load for this
Hi,
I could reproduce the error message you are getting, and I had to set the
called party numbering plan to ISDN along with the called party number type
desired,
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 11:40 PM, kill mill jha...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi.
I ran into this problem the requirement is to send
\+ hi Otto,
Thank You for the good explanation.
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 7:58 AM, Otto Sanchez o...@ipexpert.com wrote:
Hi,
The difference is that with the trust keyword the router relies on the
network markings received to perform classification (class maps). When is
not specified the
\+ Hi Pulos.
Thanks for explanation.
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 5:02 PM, Pulos, Greg gpu...@doc.gov wrote:
This is stating that the UC should not be able to 'loop' calls to itself.
In other words, a call to the Unity system does not get routed by unity
such that unity has to receive/answer
I did find the issue. Basically in the lab BR2 isdn switch type is net 5
net5 will allow 8 digit extension as any plan type populated by CCAPI/ H323
stack. PRI-NI on the other hand will look at the number
format and see if its 10 digit it will consider it as national and if
international is
)
\+1[2-9]xx[2-9]xxx / pt-nanp-tp(TP) where did we create this
TP ??? can't follow the logic here ???
Thanks for your help !!!
AK
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_voice/attachments/20100114
hi all,
i plan to attend on 25 Jan , San Jose.
if anyone attend same schedule and want to share hotel, pls ping me
tks
--- On Thu, 1/7/10, Roger Källberg roger.kallb...@cygate.se wrote:
From: Roger Källberg roger.kallb...@cygate.se
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Boot Camp March 15 - 26
To:
30 matches
Mail list logo
