On HQ side do trust if you've done LAN and all other sites dont trust since
you dont have LAN QoS
On Jun 6, 2011 4:03 AM, Michael Luo hout...@gmail.com wrote:
When configure auto QoS for WAN (on router), shall we use trust keyword
or
not? What's the best practice?
Thanks!
Michael
Hi Adam,
No need to remember all ports by memory at all...
You have all tools available in IOS to lookup ports:
h323 signalling:
VOICEGW#show ip port-map h323
Default mapping: h323 tcp port 1720
system defined
h323 RAS:
VOICEGW#show ip port-map h225ras
Default mapping: h225ras
Hi Guys,
What are the documents available for us to use during the exam ?
just a general question :)
--
Ravindra Lakpriya
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit
www.ipexpert.com
Are you a CCNP or CCIE
Rogers,
On branch sites, since there is no LAN QoS, frames/packets
arrive in with proper L3 markings. My practice has been to trust the markings
on the branch sites. Any particular reason why you don't do it on the branch
sites?
Thanks,
Emin
From:
Thanks Kiwi. On a side note, calling number transformation has to be handled
at
RL level in order to different calling number requirements (local, ld and intl)?
Also, two RPs (\+1919.XXX placed in two different partitions) have to be
configured if Site B has a requirement of TEHO for
Non trust on branches would likely get you the points. However, I have the
same
question as Emin. Can't we configure trust on branches to match on the HQ
side,
especially if there aren't any requirements?
From: Emin Guliyev eguli...@fidelus.com
To: Rogers
George,
Cool. Just didn't know about the ip port-map command.
How about the h245 port range? How do you figure it out?
Cheers,
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 3:11 AM, George Goglidze gogli...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Adam,
No need to remember all ports by memory at all...
You have all tools available
IMHO, whenever you are not requested specifically to trust or not-trust,
then not-trust is the safest way to go. This way you know you have control
of the proper dscp taggings on the WAN links.
If you do trust, then you must make sure that all devices are sending proper
dscp. Eg: mgcp
:)
you got me there... that's the only one you're going to have to remember.
11000 - 11999 not that difficult...
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 3:38 PM, Randall Saborio ill2...@gmail.com wrote:
George,
Cool. Just didn't know about the ip port-map command.
How about the h245 port range? How do you
Yeap, that range sounds like doable to remember.
The trick is that when I have tested it on the lab. Eg: I have tried to use
some ACLs to block H245 messages, my H245 packets are always using TCP ports
out of that range :S
From my practice, the range was more like 11000-65356 !!
Will do
Everything here -
http://www.cisco.com/cisco/web/psa/default.html?mode=prodlevel0=278875240
Also, a couple of the SRNDs will be available on the desktop. This is
common knowledge, not breaking my NDA here :)
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
by the way, just found the way to get h245 ports from IOS too:
VOICEGW#show ip nbar port-map h323 tcp
port-map h323 tcp 1300 1718 1719 1720 *11000 - 11999 *
Regards,
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 4:03 PM, Randall Saborio ill2...@gmail.com wrote:
Yeap, that range sounds like
thanks Jeff
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 7:13 PM, givemeccievoice2...@gmail.com wrote:
Everything here -
http://www.cisco.com/cisco/web/psa/default.html?mode=prodlevel0=278875240
Also, a couple of the SRNDs will be available on the desktop. This is
common knowledge, not breaking my NDA here :)
Awesome George
Thx
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 6, 2011, at 2:11 AM, George Goglidze gogli...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Adam,
No need to remember all ports by memory at all...
You have all tools available in IOS to lookup ports:
h323 signalling:
VOICEGW#show ip port-map h323
Default
hi - re EM call routing path: we can use device mobility to flip to the roaming
device pool to support this.
hth.
Brian
Sent from my iPad
On 6 Jun 2011, at 15:05, Qq Ccie cci...@yahoo.com wrote:
Thanks Kiwi. On a side note, calling number transformation has to be handled
at RL level
Hello I need to know if the feature Meet-me can initiate for first call from
PSTN Gateway instead of cisco ip phone, when Gw have a DID to number meet-me.
Thanks.
La informaci?n incluida en este mensaje y sus anexos es CONFIDENCIAL y para USO
EXCLUSIVO de
very cool
thank you George
2011/6/6 Rrcrumm rrcr...@yahoo.com
Awesome George
Thx
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 6, 2011, at 2:11 AM, George Goglidze gogli...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Adam,
No need to remember all ports by memory at all...
You have all tools available in IOS to lookup ports:
thanks guys
2011/6/3 Miron Kobelski findko...@gmail.com
It's feasible as you don't need to gather the trace file - you get the same
output in CLI as with debug udp on the router (packets received and sent on
BOOTP/BOOTC udp ports), but my method is indeed more time consuming.
I need to
I though the CSS on device pool mean for Device Mobility only, not for
Extension
Mobility?
From: Brian btmulg...@gmail.com
To: Qq Ccie cci...@yahoo.com
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Sent: Mon, June 6, 2011 1:06:09 PM
Hi Guys,
Anyone encounter this issue before? when I try to adding contact in IPPM
using the AddByExt options,
and it says no UserID matches the extension
I've the extension number configured under the End User page, Telephone
Number field, also selected
the primary extension for the user. I
no it cant.
it has to be initiated from a phone
ip session (ipcelerate) can do the oposite. they call it reverse meet me
2011/6/6 Santiago Figueroa sfigue...@mnet.com.mx
Hello I need to know if the feature Meet-me can initiate for first call
from PSTN Gateway instead of cisco ip phone, when
I do not believe this is possible. When playing with this feature, I tried
several variations to see if I could initiate the call from the outside. It
appears that you can only join a Meet-Me conference that is already in
progress, but not initiate it from the PSTN.
Earl Hough
CCIE #16508
No
-Original Message-
From: Santiago Figueroa sfigue...@mnet.com.mx
Sender: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 12:22:04
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.comccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Meet-me
if you have local route groups
when the user logs in to a phone using EM it will use the LRG of the DP that
yo associated to the device. because on the device profile you can't assign
a device pool.
you can indeed use the line device approach
where you allow on the device calling search space
sorry picked up the thread wrong - i thought we were roaming devices between
sites and using extension mobility.
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 6:58 PM, Qq Ccie cci...@yahoo.com wrote:
I though the CSS on device pool mean for Device Mobility only, not for
Extension Mobility?
NO... Unfortunately.
Sent from my iPad
On 6 Jun 2011, at 18:22, Santiago Figueroa sfigue...@mnet.com.mx wrote:
Hello I need to know if the feature Meet-me can initiate for first call from
PSTN Gateway instead of cisco ip phone, when Gw have a DID to number meet-me.
I don't think you can do add by extension without having LDAP imtegration done.
Sent from my iPad
On 6 Jun 2011, at 19:01, Alex Goh ncsalex@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Guys,
Anyone encounter this issue before? when I try to adding contact in IPPM
using the AddByExt options,
and it says no
Is it possible to preserve VoiceView functionality in SRST?
CUE is integrated with CUCM. VoiceView works in normal mode.
In SRST voice mail works, I even can log in to VoiceView, but when I want to
playback the message (select Listen) I get Authentication error. Report this
error to your
Thanks Cristobal. So Globalized dialing is a prerequisite as well?
From: Cristobal Priego cristobalpri...@gmail.com
To: Qq Ccie cci...@yahoo.com
Cc: Brian btmulg...@gmail.com; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Sent: Mon, June 6,
Thanks for your reply.
De: Hough, Earl [mailto:earl.ho...@pcmallservices.com]
Enviado el: Lunes, 06 de Junio de 2011 01:25 p.m.
Para: Santiago Figueroa; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Asunto: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Meet-me
I do not believe this is possible. When
if you have your calling/called party transformation you can also use
globalized dialing
when you you log in with EM the only change on the phone is going to be the
settings assigned to the line, those settings will be overwritten by the
device profile.
2011/6/6 Qq Ccie cci...@yahoo.com
Hello I have doubt is possible to have a TCL IVR work in Gateway but if the
flash it fail then to send calls to IVR in Unity in automatic?
Thnaks
La informaci?n incluida en este mensaje y sus anexos es CONFIDENCIAL y para USO
EXCLUSIVO de sus destinatarios. No
Guys - just on this topic; if we had a question which required extension
mobility be configured on an HQ phone (with no mention of roaming between
sites) would we still be expected to update the dial plan to support HQ
localised dialling from a BR1 phone?
any thoughts appreciated.
thks
On Mon,
you're not roaming when you use extension mobility because the DP never
changes
if we need to localize the dialing for the user, then i will use the CSS of
the device profile.
2011/6/6 Brian Mulgrew btmulg...@gmail.com
Guys - just on this topic; if we had a question which required
-Original Message-
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of
ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com
Sent: Monday, June 06, 2011 2:09 PM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 64, Issue 60
Send
you can use B-ACD
2011/6/6 Santiago Figueroa sfigue...@mnet.com.mx
Hello I have doubt is possible to have a TCL IVR work in Gateway but if
the flash it fail then to send calls to IVR in Unity in automatic?
Thnaks
--
La información incluida en este mensaje y
No you can't because it's trying to use CTI porta to play the message, not SIP
INVITE as it would do if it was integrated with CUCME...
Regards,
Sent from my iPad
On 6 Jun 2011, at 20:18, Victor Malyuga victor_maly...@yahoo.com wrote:
Is it possible to preserve VoiceView functionality in
Thanks Cristobal - must engage my brain next time I post!
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 9:17 PM, Cristobal Priego
cristobalpri...@gmail.comwrote:
you're not roaming when you use extension mobility because the DP never
changes
if we need to localize the dialing for the user, then i will use the CSS
Or not.
(plz read)
Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to
ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
hello guys
I took my 2nd attempt lab attempt on Friday and i just got my score
i failed with 77%
i'm a bit disappointed but willing to give it a try 1 more time
i'm located in california
i'm willing to give it a try in july the week of the 18th i need to check
the dates i think that's the closest
Dears,
I have tried the configuration, and it is working fine but for some reason
the fourth call attempt is always giving CUCM error message your call
cannot be completed as dialed please consult...
below is part of my configuration on HQ router:
interface FastEthernet0/0.11
encapsulation
I agree the answer is no, but I believe its more about the authenticate URL.
When registered to CUCM, phone will have the authenticate url pointing to
CUCM.
CUE will push the audio to the phone through http and will authenticate with
JTAPI user which must control the phone.
When in SRST mode,
I have got a few for sale. Get em while they left. $30 each
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit
www.ipexpert.com
Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
www.PlatinumPlacement.com
You would need to configure either zone prefix (priority) or tech-prefix for
routing within local zone GK.
From: naser jalouk naser.jal...@gmail.com
To: edot...@ams.net
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Sent: Mon, June 6, 2011 6:45:12 PM
Subject: Re: [OSL |
Hello Experts,
How do I set up a Calling Party Transformation in DP to trap any devices
that did not have any caller ID assigned and assign them to a general
number? How do I assign pattern to match null caller ID in the calling
party transformation?
Thank you,
Bo
hi all,
i am doing mock lab 2 (last updated on 04122011) today and have faced
certain types of calls being blocked by PSTN-WAN router.
is anyone facing the same issue in other labs?
after looking at the PSTN-WAN config, i made changes to my dialplan
and after that things are fine with me.
if
46 matches
Mail list logo
