behold.
talk to a rock or a dog, it's more or less the same.
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 2:43 PM, adam compton wrote:
> I guess I'll never pass then
>
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 11:45 AM, CCIE STUDENT
> wrote:
>>
>> Go to church
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Peterson Ryan
>> Date: Fri,
Hi,
Can you comment on gradedlabs (INE) voice rack quality if you have used
before? its price is cheaper compared to IPExpert proctorlabs (2.5 times
cheaper) & CCBootcamp (NLI) seems the most expensive Voice Rack.
Can anybody comment on quality if you have used before?
Thanks,
Dave
__
If I make a call from the remote destination number via MVA the calling name is
not displayed on the called phone while the phone is ringing. Only the
extension associated with the RDP is displayed. Once the call is connected the
name and extension is displayed on the called phone.
Did someone
I wonder if anyone has ever changed their WAN connections from the
fabulous Frame-Relay to Ethernet in the IPX topology? Could you then
use RSVP on the IPX topology? Could you do most of the lab work in
this configuration? Sure the real lab might not do it but you can
learn because in the real w
My understanding is the same as yours. Include priority queue and at
that point presumably all ranged (assigned) traffic will go out as
priority on that queue regardless. Assuming this traffic was to exceed
allocations on other queues, they are indeed crowded out, making
share/shape irrelevant.
>From my understanding, it will only override the 1st queue, all other
>thresholds stay intact...
I could be wrong...
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Dial Peer
Sent: Friday, June 24, 2011 12:02 PM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestu
Hi all I'm tying to configure LLQ that will mark packets when it exceeds the
configured bandwidth.
Example:
MPLS network has 384K Gold queue for all packets marked EF/Prec 5 and drops
all packets once its exceeds 384. I'm trying to configure a policy map that
will mark all EF/Prec 5 that excee
I'm confused by all the discussions about "priority-queue out" command.
>From my understanding, this command eanble "strict priority", which means
none of the other queues can transmit until the priority queue was emptied.
If this command was enabled, both the "srr-queue bandwidth share" and
"srr
I guess I'll never pass then
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 11:45 AM, CCIE STUDENT wrote:
> Go to church
> -Original Message-
> From: Peterson Ryan
> Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 14:21:57
> To:
> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Taking the lab next week
>
> Hi experts!
>
> I am taking my lab next we
I was not trying to confuse things, I was just confirming that you
could use RSVP over an Ethernet connection.
I supplied part of the configuration supplied on the Cisco
documentation. I clearly said to find the cisco doc. I also said that
it is not normally done.
I would suggest that you could
Guys,
Do you manually add "max-reserved-bandwidth 100" statement
under the qos applied interface? Looks like it is not part of the auto-qos.
Only affects the qos allocations when percent% is used.
Thanks,
___
For more information regar
Technically speaking, there's no way to put the RSVP "agent" in the LAN
giving the topology of IPexpert (or similar).
Yes, you could configure "ip rsvp bandwidth xxx" commands in VLAN or LAN.
But the "agent" won't be invoked. All you can see was the agent on WAN
interface was invoked.
On Fri, Ju
Hello Mohamed,
Thank you for your input on this. Disabling DHCP on my SIP phones did the
trick. The errors that I was seeing ("Error Updating Locale", "DNS Unknown
Host" and "File Not Found: CTLFile.tlv") have disappeared as well.
Just to see if the problem would re-appear I enabled DHCP
Hi,
I went through the systems guide and could find out the following info for RSVP
codec allocation for multidirectional call, Can you please validate my
understanding.
Special Configuration With RSVP
In an RSVP session, special configuration applies if all the following
conditions exist:
O
Thanks Mohamed.I will configure the network on the phone manually to see if
the behavior changes.
From: Mohamed Gazzaz [mailto:mgaz...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Friday, June 24, 2011 10:18 AM
To: ising...@gmail.com; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 7965 SIP Phones Keep R
Thanks George.I have verified this to be correct. Any other ideas? Please
note that the same type of phone with same firmware load is exhibiting a
similar behavior on CUCM and CUCME.
From: George Goglidze [mailto:gogli...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, June 24, 2011 9:47 AM
To: Inder Google
Cc: cc
Hi Inder,
I have a bunch of 7970 phones and I noticed that some phones will reset when I
use DHCP (My 871 router will allocate IPs to the phones). After configuring the
Ip address, Subnet Msk, Gateway, and TFTP manually on all the phones, I didn't
face this issue (till now).
My Sip phones
Make sure the following interfaces are same:
voice service voip
sip
bind all source-interface **
voice register global
source-address **
Regards,
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 3:24 PM, Inder Google wrote:
> Hello,
>
> ** **
>
> I am using the proctor labs gear via an ezvpn connection a
Go to church
-Original Message-
From: Peterson Ryan
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 14:21:57
To:
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Taking the lab next week
Hi experts!
I am taking my lab next week in San Jose for the first time. Besides the
excellent coffee I keep hearing about, does anyone have
None's answer was already good enough.
Barry and Bill are just adding confusion...
Bill, just because you add the ip rsvp command to an interface, it doesn't
mean there is going to be RSVP going through that interface. A component
like a dial-peer or rsvp agent must request the reservation throug
Hello,
I am using the proctor labs gear via an ezvpn connection and my own set of
7965 phones. When registering 7965 phones as SIP devices both the CUCM
attached phone and the CUCME attached phone keep resetting.
The CUCM attached phone registers and then resets immediately. The CUCME
pho
Hi experts!
I am taking my lab next week in San Jose for the first time. Besides the
excellent coffee I keep hearing about, does anyone have any advice they would
impart?
For example, I am back and forth on using the device method vs the linear
method.
Without breaking NDA, anything people w
Is this part of the joke thread. Cause i dont understand crap about it!
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 5:50 AM, Adil Shaikh wrote:
> I am not sure whether this function will lead to the final answer.
> But i think this alternative method may work.
>
> Shelesh created 'plus-pt'.
> Now, he needs to creat
Going by memory with no ?
Sccp local l0 << this binds sccp to loop0
Sccp ccm 10.10.210.11 id 1 ver 6
Sccp ccm 10.10.210.10 id 2 ver 6
Sccp
Also you can bind the ccm group
Sccp ccm group 1
Associate ccm 1 p 1
Associate ccm 2 p 2
Associate profile 1 register hq-mtp
Read the callmanager system guide and you will find your answer, I promise.
-Original Message-
From: sandeep.ra...@wipro.com
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 10:38:17
To:
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Doubt on AAR and codec
Hi Everyone,
Can any one explain what is meant by multi directional
I am not sure whether this function will lead to the final answer.
But i think this alternative method may work.
Shelesh created 'plus-pt'.
Now, he needs to create 'minus-pt'.
Then he needs to sum up 'plus-pt' and 'minus-pt'. The result will be
'zero-pt'.
'zero-pt' can't be put in 'plus-css' or 'm
Hi Everyone,
Can any one explain what is meant by multi directional audio w.r.t AAR. If
asked to set the other codec to ILBC or G729 for multidirectional Audio on
CUCM, how should i do it.
I interpret multidirectional audio as conferencing , not sure if that is right
though.
Would appreciate
27 matches
Mail list logo