You can download from cisco.com
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 10, 2011, at 6:53 PM, Inder Singh wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am on volume 1 lab 13 and am being asked to install the CUPC client. Does
> anyone know where the install files are hidden?
>
> Thanks. Inder.
>
> Inder Singh
> (403) 992-69
Hi,
Modern science teach us not to believe anything unless someone proves it. I
had opened many TAC cases & TAC Engineers always verified everything with
published cisco documentation & that's the main difference I see with cisco
& other competing products. ( some exceptions are docs shared from
d
Hi All,
I am on volume 1 lab 13 and am being asked to install the CUPC client. Does
anyone know where the install files are hidden?
Thanks. Inder.
Inder Singh
(403) 992-6956
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, pleas
Hello All,
I just wanted to update you on the fix. After a couple people replied it
was all too simple ;-).
I had missed creating an ephone-dn for the number is the user profile.
Thanks to all that replied.
Regards.
Inder Singh
(403) 992-6956
On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 9:55 AM, Inder Singh wr
Hey Kshitij ,
there is no need for this way of talking nor taking this personal , or
offending people (note this is the second time)
i do know the policy of this group very well and i know my limit and what is
right and what is wrong ,
the fact is you are conflicting with all any discussion i am
Hi Inder,
Have you created an ephone-dn for 3102? I think that might be missing, which
is why you aren't seeing the extension.
On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 9:25 PM, wrote:
> Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to
>ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the Wo
Hi Ray,
47 is used since:
We add 7 bytes for LFI
2 for cRTP
20 for G.729 with a ptime of 20ms.
This equals to 29 bytes * 50 * 8 = 11.6 (this is the BW being used for 1
G.729 call)
4 G729 calls = 4 * 11.6 = 46.4
Hence, we put 47.
I have not read the question completely but I think this is what
Hi Ash,
That is exactly what I have done - SHARED my thoughts and config. NEVER told
anyone to stop sharing so I am utterly flummoxed with respect to WHERE you
figured that out from. Unfortunately, you seem to be hell bent on picking an
argument at the most inappropriate place (i.e. the OSL) and o
Hello All,
I am working on Lab 9A in volume 1 and have setup extension mobility for
CME. Here is the configuration:
voice logout-profile 1
pin 1234
number 3002 type normal
!
voice user-profile 1
max-idle-time 10
user br2ph3 password adgjm
number 3102 type normal
speed-dial 1 3006
!
em log
Hello Ken ,
your search and explanation is pretty good and made sense and i think they
are correct , in regard of the CCM DTG , you are correct the ccm have
predefined DST for non USA sites , however in the routers , i am not sure
but its pretty interesting and i think the DOC you share is the one
Hi
It looks like it should be calculated like this
7+2+20=29*50*8=11,600*4=46,400 rounded up is 47
Hth
Randall
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 10, 2011, at 4:49 AM, Ray wrote:
> in lab5
> task 7.2... it says 16k for singnaling and 4 g729 calls. the question is
> why is 47 used for bandwidth
Is it compressed audio maybe?
Enviado desde mi iPhone
El Sep 10, 2011, a las 4:49, Ray escribió:
in lab5
task 7.2... it says 16k for singnaling and 4 g729 calls. the
question is why is 47 used for bandwidth instead of 96 (24x4=96).
___
For
Actually I sorted it out, I didnt set the CSS in the CTI Route point and CTI
port.
I outlooked it.
Thanks :)
--- On Sat, 10/9/11, Ashraf Ayyash wrote:
From: Ashraf Ayyash
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Problem with UC and CUCME integration
To: "Vega Wong"
Cc: "Rynard Coetzee" ,
"ccie_vo
in lab5
task 7.2... it says 16k for singnaling and 4 g729 calls. the
question is why is 47 used for bandwidth instead of 96 (24x4=96). ___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit
www.ipexpert.com
Are you a
All ,
the get reporting static will give get value for you and that's all ,
and in the scenario you are talking about you need to make the CCX
script say this number so you will need to have generate prompt step
to read the value which you got from the get reporting statics .
so the decrement ste
from where you have choose unsolicited in the CUC ?
what you need to have configured in case of SIP integration with CUCM-CUC is
:
from *System* > *Security Profile* > *SIP Trunk Security Profile*.
check (enable) *Accept Unsolicited Notifications* so that Cisco Unity and
Unity Connection can not
you will need to check what ANI/DNIS/RDINS.etc.. in this calls , from
ther RTMT , there is something called port monitor , which will give
you real time info about the call and what exactly happened to it and
what rule/call handler it reached , and then you can proceed further
based on what you wil
check the following :
1- when you dial the trigger have you seen the called number on the
phone screen changed to the CTI port number instead of the CTI route
point number you have already dialed ? if so this mean the call have
been accepted by the CCX engin but something bad happened after that
w
HI,
I hope someone can help me. I am not sure I am testing this correctly (maybe I
am reading too much into the question).
I setup live record and it works internally.
I add an alternative extension to a VM box, (2123942123) line 2 PSTN.
1. If I dial 394-5610, it records the conversation
19 matches
Mail list logo
