Hey, dude! Look at this! You will be really surprised!...
http://www.cercasa.it/comp.link.php?rjwgoogleId=08e0
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit
Hi Randall - on cupc go to help show server health and look for the error
messages, click on them for more info and post info please.
hth
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 11:39 PM, Rrcrumm rrcr...@yahoo.com wrote:
The lab I am working on has a cupc Clint on the uccx server that I can
register. I
]
*On Behalf Of *Rrcrumm
*Sent:* Wednesday, January 04, 2012 9:40 AM
*To:* Brian Mulgrew
*Cc:* Online Study; Ken Wyan
*Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Presence
** **
I have tftp error on the client, but I have configured the tftp servers on
the server and have added a cupc phone
hi - yes this is possible, ldap integration with CUCM AD and AXL integration
with CUCM CUC
hth
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2011 22:46:50 +0400
From: datucha...@gmail.com
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] AD users
Hello,
Is it possible to integrate CUCM with AD (For
are your MTPs registered and configured as rsvp under dspfarm profile?
if so can you send over your full ios configs
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 6:20 PM, datucha123 datucha123 datucha...@gmail.com
wrote:
Yes, the DPs are assigned correctly.
calls are successfully completed, but the RSVP is not
Hi - if using vmware you can take a snapshot (fastest and most flexible),
if bare metal you can use DRS to backup and restore full ucm configs, or
you can export phones to bat csv format and reimport them.
hth
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 7:51 PM, Emanuel Damasceno aedamasc...@gmail.comwrote:
gatekeeper will not send calls back out the sending trunk; so calls from
CME are fine, and usually calls from CUCM are fine but when we have two
CUCM trunks registered there is a risk of calls leaving one CUCM trunk and
trying to send the call to the other.
hth
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 7:42
well done Stuart!
From: stuart.geoghe...@ngbailey.co.uk
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 22:01:50 +
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Passed
Hi All,
I took the Lab at Brussels yesterday and passed!
CCIE #31619
I would like to thank all those who have
Hi Stuart - try checking redirecting number outbound on your HQ gateway -
if still an issue can you post a debug isdn q931 on hq and br2 gateways?
hth
Brian
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 5:59 PM, Geoghegan, Stuart
stuart.geoghe...@ngbailey.co.uk wrote:
Hi All
** **
I am working with my lab
Hi - Ensure your h323 gateway in cucm has a css that can see the mva
number but not the route pattern (which points to the h323 gateway).
Hth
On 25/10/2011, Anthony Alba ascanio.al...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
When I try to use MVA with MGCP hairpin I cannot make calls.
When I try to make a
Hi - I think this is a limitation on this generation of phone with sip load.
Hth
Brian
On 23/10/2011, Chris Martin clm.c...@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe try adding your ntp reference in the voice global and creating
profiles then reset?
Chris
On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 6:21 PM, Emanuel Damasceno
] On Behalf Of Brian Mulgrew
Sent: 14 October 2011 09:55
To: OSL
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] thoughts on plan / type / name requirements for
ani / dnis
Hi - I was just wondering what the general consensus was on the best
approach for setting plan, type and name given various scenarios:
e.g.
If DNIS
This should work, for options 1 2 do a debug voice ccapi inout and see if
you are hitting your hq gateway, if not issue is with aar mask / prefix /
route pattern,
Option 3 I suspect is related to aar group config.
I am a little confused as to why you would have 2 x IPCC pilots in two
different
Hi - try removing the directory entries in telephony-service, create cnf and
reset ephones, These entries are not required if you have an ephone-dn
name.
hth
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 5:26 PM, Alejandra G Romero alexg...@gmail.comwrote:
Hello
I have a problem with call-list (directories -
Hi - check your mva service params and ensure the css is set to line device
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 3:54 AM, Cisco Nut rafayc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello
I have configured Cisco Mobile Voice Access as per V1 Lab 5C, when I dial
2123945999 I hear prompt and after authentication, I enter 1002# I
i think calling part xfm on your rdp should fix this
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 2:04 AM, edgar feliz ejfeli...@yahoo.com wrote:
I came across this today when doing labs and had not paid attention to
this before but today I did a lot of things from memory even though the
order was not same as
Hi - has anyone been able to connect to the voice racks since yesterday's
outage?
I have logged a case but was advised 5 hours ago that there is still a vpn
issue with no eta for a fix.
Cheers
Brian ___
For more
I understand what we would do in the real world where int / nat does not
overlap with subscriber, but if we are being asked to support 9 plus any 8
digits in the lab, would we not need to include support for 900.. in the
lab?
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 10:56:25 -0700
From:
from 914158884343 to
4158884343 when i am trying to manipulate on Route Pattern Level as advised.
Any suggestions
would be appreciated,
Many thanks
Stuart
From: Brian Mulgrew [btmulg...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Friday, September 23, 2011 6:24 PM
To: Geoghegan, Stuart; ccie_voice
Hi
set rp as 9.14158884343
set cld party xfm on rp as pre. (for TO display)
and set relevant cld party xfm on gwys / rout list for dnis digit manipulation
hth
From: stuart.geoghe...@ngbailey.co.uk
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2011 13:43:46 +0100
Subject: [OSL |
check your image sizes
TN-voiceslarge.png - should be the thumbnail image 80x53
voicesmall.png - should be the large image 320x212
hth
Sent from my iPad
On 22 Sep 2011, at 19:54, Ray jonha...@yahoo.com wrote:
has anyone done background image and it works.. when i go to user
Under Outbound Calls, check the *Redirecting Diversion Header Delivery -
Outbound* check box
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 1:00 PM, Rynard Coetzee
rynard.coet...@bytes.co.zawrote:
The null partition will by default be added to any CSS that you create
,you will not actually see it in the list but it
Just the one
On 18/09/2011, donny f f.faraday...@gmail.com wrote:
how many CCIE for Master UC ?
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 2:57 AM, Brian Mulgrew btmulg...@hotmail.comwrote:
for gold partner status any of the CCIE tracks are supported, for Master
Specializations (e.g. Master of UC
guys, imo i go with Ash and results are dependant on the order and timing of
the commands:
ntp server x.x.x.x
sho ntp associations and verify stratum
ntp master xx and set stratum level value higher than the server
ntp source xx to bind to interface
from ios guide:
If the system has ntp master
check
on hq-3750:
interface FastEthernet1/0/1
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport trunk native vlan 10
switchport mode trunk
on hq-rtr:
interface FastEthernet0/0.10
encapsulation dot1Q 10 native
ip address 10.10.100.1 255.255.255.0
!
interface FastEthernet0/0.20
well done!
Sent from my iPad
On 9 Sep 2011, at 20:33, khaled Saholy khaled_sah...@hotmail.com wrote:
Congratulations. Alf Mabrouk.
Khaled Al-Saholy
From: ahmed_ellbo...@rayacorp.com
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2011 15:57:53 +
Subject: [OSL |
yep - its down
From: nishi...@hotmail.com
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com; supp...@ipexpert.com
Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2011 04:24:30 +
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Unable to access Proctorlabs.com
Hi,
I am unable to access or open proctorlabs.com site.
getting below error.
Server
Hi Michael - is your gkp trunk set to 4 digits in cucm?
b
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 7:29 PM, michael.se...@compucom.com wrote:
I cannot complete calls from BR2 CME to BR1 or HQ using gatekeeper on
HQ-RTR. I’ve verified the Gateway in CUCM and the Gatekeeper in CUCM and
the Trunk and still
Hi Stuart - check your IOS sccp ccm x.x.x.x identifier x priority x version
x command specifies the version ( think it needs to be 5.0 or above for
rsvp).
hth
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 3:13 PM, Geoghegan, Stuart
stuart.geoghe...@ngbailey.co.uk wrote:
Hi All,
** **
I have been
Hi - can you send on output for debugs isdn q931 and voice dialpeer?
hth
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 2:14 AM, Vincent Lyu lvwen...@gmail.com wrote:
hi Bartosz,
All of this based on one default CSS and partition.
VincentLyu
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 1:54 AM, Bartosz Sokolowski
Congrats Adam!
On 22/07/2011, adam compton com...@gmail.com wrote:
Just found out the good news. I passed CCIE Voice #29657. This must
be a good week to take the lab. Congrats to the others who passed this week
as well
Adam Compton
--
Sent from my mobile device
Great stuff! Well done Cristobal!
On 19/07/2011, Cristobal Priego cristobalpri...@gmail.com wrote:
hello guys,
My 2 year journey just came to an end. I took my 3rd attempt yesterday in
San Jose and i just got my score 5 mins ago with good news
I'm CCIE # 29606
It was long hours of study
Hi - I think the mva dn ptn needs to be in the css of the rdp.
There is also a bug on the partial match service param.
hth
On 18/07/2011, cisco cisco ciscocci...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Experts,
Got some questions on MVA.
1)Is there any known issue with translation patterns ? It happens to me
Hi - your br1-rtr domain name (smilab.com) doesn't look to match your
sdi traces (lab.com) - check replication and try restarting ccm on
both nodes.
hth
On 17/07/2011, steven moran smoran...@gmail.com wrote:
No matter what I do I cannot get the MGCP gateway to show as registered in
CUCM 7.02.
Hi Peter - you can use the gw-priority 10 cucm-trunk_1 parameter
within the zone prefix command to ensure the publisher is always
selected first.
hth
On 17/07/2011, Peter peter.imman...@rediffmail.com wrote:
Hi,
In the lab, suppose there is a general requirement like Subscriber should be
the
Hi - ensure your 911 call is going out the same gateway (rdp device and
line css) and ensure the rdp/h323/mgcp gateway are all set to g711u only
hth
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 7:52 PM, donny f f.faraday...@gmail.com wrote:
hi all,
I config Hq router as MGCP hairpinDN :2999 and MVA 2999
Hi - I noticed this on the menu at Cisco Live this week:
Title: CCIE Voice: Cryptography in Cisco Unified Communications
Length: 2 Hours
Technical Level: Intermediate
Abstract: This session describes symmetric and asymmetric encryption,
hash-based message authentication codes, digital
Hi - can you post your gateway config.
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 9:27 AM, Hot Star hot.sta...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi Guys
Setup MVA for SB Ph 1. MVA access number is 3033300.
When SB PH 1 user dials 3033300 from 2nd line of PSTN, user should hear
Welcome to “Cisco Unified Call Manager” and
As was already announced, there will not be any Core Knowledge/Open Ended
Questions after August 15, 2011
Er.. I thought these were no longer tested as of May 2010?
Sent from my iPad
On 12 Jul 2011, at 17:38, Chris Martin clm.c...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi - this is a bug with mgcp when using l0
http://www.onlinestudylist.com/archives/ccie_voice/2011-May/074217.html
hth
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 9:36 AM, CCIEVoiceKP ccievoic...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, a sh isdn status showed multiple frame established. More often than
not I have to actually
Hi - also check that your voice register pool 1 phone is registered.
thks
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 2:30 PM, Webb Posey webbpo...@gmail.com wrote:
Try adding ccm-manager music-on-hold and ensure the flash path is correct.
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 8:20 AM,
i'm a bit rusty with b-acd, but i think param aa-hunt3 3005 needs to point to
a hunt pilot.
hth
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2011 11:55:48 -0700
From: san...@yahoo.com
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com; btmulg...@gmail.com; webbpo...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] B-acd - Not working
Hi
Well done George and thanks for all your help!
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 2:44 PM, George Goglidze gogli...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
As the subject suggests, it's official, I'm dual CCIE #19926 RS and Voice
starting yesterday.
Finally, it's a relief, no more studying late, spending weekends
i would only use UP when there is an overlap in dial plan to avoide inter
digit timeout - for nanp this should only be for 9911 which overlaps with
local 9[2-9]XX
For 911 we shouldln't need it.
cheers
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 6:26 AM, Ki Wi kiwi.vo...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes,the only
sorry picked up the thread wrong - i thought we were roaming devices between
sites and using extension mobility.
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 6:58 PM, Qq Ccie cci...@yahoo.com wrote:
I though the CSS on device pool mean for Device Mobility only, not for
Extension Mobility?
Guys - just on this topic; if we had a question which required extension
mobility be configured on an HQ phone (with no mention of roaming between
sites) would we still be expected to update the dial plan to support HQ
localised dialling from a BR1 phone?
any thoughts appreciated.
thks
On Mon,
of the device profile.
2011/6/6 Brian Mulgrew btmulg...@gmail.com
Guys - just on this topic; if we had a question which required extension
mobility be configured on an HQ phone (with no mention of roaming between
sites) would we still be expected to update the dial plan to support HQ
cuc sccp vmail port behaviour does confuse me! - even though we usually
specify the default g711u codec in cuc params, we shouldn't need an xcoder
at the vmail port side as they will support all codecs natively; cuc then
handles the xcoding internally*. So I would guess it would be pstn gwy that
/media.html#wp1045613
Table 6-2
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 11:21 AM, Randall Crumm
randall.cr...@flextronics.com wrote:
The 3x15 is for the 3 channels for the PRI
Randall
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Brian Mulgrew
Sent
PM, Brian Mulgrew btmulg...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi - Going though some of the DSGs when calculating MIPs for voice
termination the calculation is often given as 15MIPS per call for G711 would
we not calculate a worst case scenario of 40MIPs (G729r8) per call?
e.g. if using TEHO over a G729 region
Hi - Going though some of the DSGs when calculating MIPs for voice
termination the calculation is often given as 15MIPS per call for G711 would
we not calculate a worst case scenario of 40MIPs (G729r8) per call?
e.g. if using TEHO over a G729 region, device mobility etc.
This in turn could have
Great job Adam!
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 4:27 PM, Adam Thompson phoe...@fatturtle.comwrote:
My year a half long journey ended yesterday in RTP. I have finally obtained
my voice CCIE #29829.
I have been lurking for the better part of a year, and contributing when I
had a chance, but benefit
Hi Royce - I think in this instance the CUC vmail ports will be
invoking the XCoder.
hth
Brian
On 09/05/2011, Royce Goldberg roycegoldb...@gmail.com wrote:
This codec mismatch is in a CFUR scenario when siteC calls siteB which is in
SRST, through the HQ gateway:
SiteC Phone - g729 - HQ GW -
Hi Adil - a couple of things to check in CUPS are:
under system / service param / cup proxy
- ensure you have a domain name set
- change authentication module status to 'off'
hth
Brian
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 10:48 AM, Adil Shaikh adil.sha...@gmail.com wrote:
hi george,
thanks for the
Hi Scott - CME load upgrades usually relate to version upgrade
incompatabilities, unless being specifically asked to move to use a specfic
version
just take out the load command in telephony-service and voice-register pool.
If you are looking to convert load between SIP/SCCP using CUCM is
Hi - as per the good comments above, the regular (and easiest) way to add
contacts that will provide availability, phone (and calendar) presence is
through LDAP on CUPC and having CUCM LDAP integrated. We can still achieve
availability and phone presence when the LDAP userid matches the CUCM
Hi Ahmed - try adding a dial peer with incoming-called number 1... and
codec g711ulaw to your cube.
hth
Brian
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 9:22 PM, Ahmed Ellboudy ahmed_ellbo...@rayacorp.com
wrote:
Dear All,
As I am working in Vol2 lab1 q-4.3
My CUCM IP add 192.168.1.10 and 192.168.1.11 .
would TCS issues not connect the call but fail on sup services?
I thought it would be codec negotiation on dial peer or outbound fast start
(making sure we have an MTP resource on the CUCM trunk).
(apologies for typo previously should have been incoming-called number 5...)
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011
:28, Brian Mulgrew btmulg...@gmail.com wrote:
would TCS issues not connect the call but fail on sup services?
I thought it would be codec negotiation on dial peer or outbound fast
start (making sure we have an MTP resource on the CUCM trunk).
(apologies for typo previously should have been
Hi - check that the UPC device name is in the correct format e.g. UPCUSER1
You can also issue tftp -i get cucm_ip UPCUSER1.CNF.XML from the client XP
PC to ensure the config file is created and downloadable.
hth
Brian
On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 12:09 AM, Rrcrumm rrcr...@yahoo.com wrote:
Ah
I
on my pc?
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 16, 2011, at 11:49 PM, Brian Mulgrew btmulg...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi - check that the UPC device name is in the correct format e.g. UPCUSER1
You can also issue tftp -i get cucm_ip UPCUSER1.CNF.XML from the client
XP PC to ensure the config file is created
Hi Nizar - In this example working in reverse:
priority-queue out
PQ is enabled and will always be served until empty in the event of
congestion
srr-queue bandwidth shape 3 0 0 0
since PQ is enabled the shaped value for Q1 is ignored
srr-queue bandwidth share 1 75 25 5
since PQ is enabled
Hi - You will need to push the call through CUE AA
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/voicesw/ps5520/products_configuration_example09186a0080566c4a.shtml
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/voicesw/ps5520/products_configuration_example09186a0080566c4a.shtml
hth
Brian
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011
Hi Alex - see this excellent post from Shingei re Multicast outwith cucm
cluster
http://onlinestudylist.com/archives/ccie_voice/2011-March/073393.html
Your unicast issue sounds as if it may be codec / xcoder related.
hth
Brian
Hi - Is DNS being used? May need the fqdn of the gateway.
Hth
Brian
On 27/03/2011, Hough, Earl earl.ho...@pcmallservices.com wrote:
Randal,
It should work if you just do these 4 steps:
On the gateway:
1) no mgcp
2) no mgcp bind control
3) mgcp bind control
#16508 (RS/Security/Voice)
-Original Message-
From: Brian Mulgrew [mailto:btmulg...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2011 2:28 PM
To: Hough, Earl; Randall Crumm; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] I can't get MGCP to register to lo0
Hi - Is DNS being
Hi Michael -
Voice service voip
no supplementary-service h225-notify cid-update
Should restrict the h225 notify clid back to the CUCM phone
hth
Brian
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 7:07 PM, Michael Luo hout...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm using CUCM 7.1.2 with H.323 gateway.
In H323 GW, the dial-peer
Hi Leslie - is h245tcs unchecked on the CUCM gk trunk?
hth
Brian
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 3:49 AM, Leslie Meade lme...@signal.ca wrote:
I have gotten cube setup and everything works as planned call goes via the
cube and I have a software mtp for placing calls on hold.
If I dial 5xxx or 1xxx
resume I can not hear the other side.
I have a MTP assigned to the HQ device pool and also to the GK.
I have blown everything away and i have got the same thing again.
-Original Message-
From: Brian Mulgrew [mailto:btmulg...@gmail.com btmulg...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tue 3/15/2011 4:29 AM
Hi Adil - the no-reg to gkp is:
max-dn 2 no-reg
hth
Brian
On 13/03/2011, Adil Shaikh adil.sha...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
I have configured 'no-reg both' on the BR2-RTR's ephone-dn and
telephony-service, still ephone-dn get registered with gatekeeper.
I do not want ephone-dn to be
Sorry read your config incorrectly you have this line in.
Try no gateway / gateway
Hth
Brian
On 13/03/2011, Brian Mulgrew btmulg...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Adil - the no-reg to gkp is:
max-dn 2 no-reg
hth
Brian
On 13/03/2011, Adil Shaikh adil.sha...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
I have
Hi Rahul - make sure your cube incoming and outgoing dial peers are set to
support calls to br2 and the relevent translation profile is applied to
strip of tech prefix.
thks
Brian
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 7:03 PM, Rahul Kapor rahul.kapo...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi All,
I am able to send call to
Hi - Prob worth checking your cld party xfm setup on the h323 gateway to
ensure they are appending 011 to +.! - as these are usually set at gateway
level it is possible your br1 is configured differently which is why your
getting different results.
hth
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 4:55 PM, CCIE
to, which binds this dp with
aa application.
Please clarify if you think there's something missing,
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 6:41 PM, Brian Mulgrew
btmulg...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi Mihal - Make sure you have a voip dial peers with the application
pilot numbers set, pointing to L0 IP, also need
Hi Mihal - Make sure you have a voip dial peers with the application
pilot numbers set, pointing to L0 IP, also need to include the service
line in these to bind the dp to the b-acd apps.
Thanks
Brian
On 01/02/2011, mihal caro mihalc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all
I'm having a bit off issues
Guys - I have noticed that when i building my config for my gateway to
register with gatekeeper i use the following command;
h323-gateway voip id zone ipaddr x.x.x.x
!where x.x.x.x is the gatekeeper ip
But when I look through the h323 ios 12.4 config guide the syntax referred
to is
Hi Amr - It is the call leg which doesn't support the LBR Codec which
invokes the xcoder - which in this case is your CME SIP phone. Try
setting this to g729 and test without cme xcoder.
Also on CUCM side when using OB Faststart the codec defined in the MTP
is used - when using CUCM to supply MTP
Hi - its effectively MS OCS 2K7 and E2K7 in the cloud. Can be used
with CUCIMOC and CUCM for Presence and IM, with E2K7 being used for
UM.
Cheers
b
On 30/09/2010, gwen...@gmail.com gwen...@gmail.com wrote:
Sent from my HTC on the Now Network from Sprint!
- Reply message -
From:
Hi - I am having some issue with what I know should be some basic config; I
cannot seem to register the BR2 phones when using ProctorLabs, but the config
works fine on my local ISR.
They register fine via PL when I use auto-reg under telephony-service and the
firmware has even upgraded
,
Bernhard
*Von:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:
ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *Im Auftrag von *Brian Mulgrew
*Gesendet:* Mittwoch, 29. September 2010 10:37
*An:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
*Betreff:* [OSL | CCIE_Voice] sccp phone registration on cme on Proctor
Labs
Hi
For status issues check the following:
sip proxy domain parameter is set to something.com in CUPS
Depending on sip authentication methods fill in any value in end user
digest credentials in cucm, ensure CUPS acls are set to allow from
your subnets or you can simply disable authentication in
Hi Sam, we have used a Unity mailbox in the past to support Conf Pin
access; call hits ctirp, fwd all to vmail, plays user greeting
(welcome to conf), caller enters (mailbox) pin to enter conf and
greeting rule transfers to meet me number.
hth
b
On 19/04/2010, Berry, Matthew J.
Hi, yep vm ports should show as registered if doing an sccp integration.
b
On 18/04/2010, Mann Chaddha mann.chad...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Guys
This is my first time with Unity Connection. I am working on the Lab 11A,
and have done the CUCM CUC Integration configs. Just wanted to know
whether
Hi - If I remember correctly if the IP Phone / CIPC cannot find the hostname of
the CUCM in the cnf.xml it will register with ccm service running on the tftp
server - so if your tftp is set as IP this could be the reason why it still
registers.
thksb
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 23:45:10 -0800
the same thing with IP Blue with 7960 selected but it didnt register
!!, it wasnt able to resolve the hostname and hence registeration wasnt
successful. Perhaps this is the behaviour that is defined in various study
guides, is it a special case with CIPC ?
From: Brian Mulgrew
btmulg
Hi Mathew - excellent post, and looks like you have successfully answered your
own question!
I'm going through the CUCM normalization study section (again) and i would
agreed that we set the Called Party Number type at the exiting PSTN gateway
using called party xform pattern as:
- The
86 matches
Mail list logo
