Hi,
In my opinion if you have such scanario you should use class based frts
which does not require frame-relay traffice-shaping command on physical
interface.
So you can configure shaping for one PVC not affecting the other.
--
Best regards,
Bartosz
2011/6/1 adam compton com...@gmail.com
So I
So I have a question as it pertains to the test. If I use auto qos on the
Serial interfaces of the HQ and SiteB routers, frame-relay traffic shaping
will be enabled. I know it will use the bandwidth that you configure for
shaping. I also understand on the HQ router, the link to SiteC would
If you're not been provided with a value to Site C; then 1544 is acceptable.
That's the one I use.
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 7:23 AM, adam compton com...@gmail.com wrote:
So I have a question as it pertains to the test. If I use auto qos on the
Serial interfaces of the HQ and SiteB routers,
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Roger
Carpio
Sent: mercredi 1 juin 2011 17:21
To: adam compton
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] frame-relay traffic-shaping on the test
If you're not been provided with a value to Site C; then 1544 is
acceptable
:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] frame-relay traffic-shaping on the test
If you're not been provided with a value to Site C; then 1544 is
acceptable. That's the one I use.
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 7:23 AM, adam compton com...@gmail.com wrote:
So I have a question as it pertains to the test. If I use
