Hi Otto, Thanks for the reply i had downgraded the Phone from SCCP 7.7 to SCCP 5.0.3 so it would look for the OS97XX.txt.
I am trying to upgrade the phone to P0S3-07-4-00. I have already followed that bit in the link you posted me in the CUCME guide. The files that came in the zip file are below: 57 592222 Jan 14 2010 17:03:56 P0S3-07-4-00.bin 58 461 Jan 14 2010 17:03:56 P0S3-07-4-00.loads 59 592626 Jan 14 2010 17:04:00 P0S3-07-4-00.sb2 60 129472 Jan 14 2010 17:03:50 P003-07-4-00.bin 61 129876 Jan 14 2010 17:03:52 P003-07-4-00.sbn Im just puzzled why it keeps asking for this file POS3-07-4-00.sbn. When its not even part of the zip or available on CCO. Thanks for the help. Cheers Kev -----Original Message----- From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com Sent: 15 January 2010 01:57 To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 47, Issue 58 Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com You can reach the person managing the list at ccie_voice-ow...@onlinestudylist.com When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CCIE_Voice digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Re: Lab 4 Q2.3 PG Guide (vccie2010) 2. First lab attempt (Erwan Erwan) 3. Re: First lab attempt (Mike Thompson) 4. Re: Lab 4 Q2.3 PG Guide (Otto Sanchez) 5. Re: Trying to upgrade a 7960 in CUCME from SCCP to SIP (Otto Sanchez) 6. Vol2 Final Configs Folders Labs 1-4 (larry Stern) 7. Re: Gateway Calling/Called Number Plan (Otto Sanchez) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 12:05:50 -0800 From: vccie2010 <vccie2...@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab 4 Q2.3 PG Guide To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Message-ID: <ee04ba001001141205h12172432u639eeb3129d4e...@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Anyone from IPexpert can shed some light on this please.... thx / /ak On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 5:05 PM, vccie2010 <vccie2...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi > > - What are the SIP dial patterns to be configured for Q 2.3 page 53. I > can't find the those in the solution pls ?? > > - Page 75, we have crated TP to block intl call and apply > css-block-intlcalls having access to these TP to Line of BR1 phone 2 which > can not dial intl number. I got 9.011 TPs but where does TP \1+! and TP\+!# > comes into picture, is it when someone tries to call from missed/recvd > calls. > > I am not also able to follow on Page 81, it says if BR1 Ph2 calls > +12123942123 ---there si duplicate match pattern > > \+! / pt-blocj-intl (TP) > > \+1[2-9]xx[2-9]xxxxxxx / pt-nanp-tp (TP) >>>>where did we create this > TP ??? can't follow the logic here ??? > > Thanks for your help !!! > > AK > > > > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_voice/attachments/20100114/a33c8b2 a/attachment-0001.htm ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 12:21:44 -0800 (PST) From: Erwan Erwan <e_er...@yahoo.com> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] First lab attempt To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Message-ID: <85400.21900...@web58707.mail.re1.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" hi all, ? Does anyone know if we have to sit for first lab within 18 months exactly ?? or can be bit flexible , mean 1 or 2 weeks more than 18 months ? As I tried to schedule for lab , and the system take it , even after 18 months period ? Thks for answer.. ? Rgs -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_voice/attachments/20100114/ed13d44 2/attachment-0001.htm ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 17:39:08 -0500 From: Mike Thompson <mthompson...@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] First lab attempt To: Erwan Erwan <e_er...@yahoo.com> Cc: "ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com" <ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com> Message-ID: <5b89d2c7-b9f6-43f0-9a4b-290eb50a3...@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" They are NOT flexible. If it let u schedule it, it's a system glitch and it will prob bite u in te rear. Sent from my phone, apologies for any typos. On Jan 14, 2010, at 3:21 PM, Erwan Erwan <e_er...@yahoo.com> wrote: > hi all, > > Does anyone know if we have to sit for first lab within 18 months > exactly ? or can be bit flexible , mean 1 or 2 weeks more than 18 > months > > As I tried to schedule for lab , and the system take it , even after > 18 months period > > Thks for answer.. > > Rgs > > _______________________________________________ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, > please visit www.ipexpert.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_voice/attachments/20100114/a062fbc b/attachment-0001.htm ------------------------------ Message: 4 Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 19:07:26 -0430 From: Otto Sanchez <o...@ipexpert.com> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab 4 Q2.3 PG Guide To: vccie2010 <vccie2...@gmail.com> Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Message-ID: <be6b39441001141537j71ff699fpfe3d0f38a192...@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Hi AK, 1.- There are not sip dial rules in the solutions as they will be needed in the case there is a sip phone dialing from directory, and all the phones run sccp load for this lab. Should the case is presented, you will have to configure intl sip dial rules with + dialing in addition to all the other destinations the phone may call, ie, internal, local, national, intl, for the digits to be sent enbloc and avoid interdigit timeout and ultimately hit the \+ pt-pstn route pattern with urgent priority, 2.- Yes, those TP are created to block intl calls from directory 3.- It says that both tp will match but the \+1[2-9]xx[2-9]xxxxxxx / pt-nanp-tp TP is a closer match, therefore it's chosen. I agree that the matched tp is not in the pg, however it must exist for all pstn US calls be routed from the directory specially for phones with the intl call restriction, otherwise when these phones call from the directory there will be a match for both the \+! pt-block-international TP and the \+! pt-pstn RP and because the of the resulting css the former will win and the call will not be routed. The css assigned to the \+1[2-9]xx[2-9]xxxxxxx / pt-nanp-tp TP should only see the pt-pstn partition in order to hit the \+ pt-pstn route pattern HTH, On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 8:35 PM, vccie2010 <vccie2...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi > > - What are the SIP dial patterns to be configured for Q 2.3 page 53. I > can't find the those in the solution pls ?? > > - Page 75, we have crated TP to block intl call and apply > css-block-intlcalls having access to these TP to Line of BR1 phone 2 which > can not dial intl number. I got 9.011 TPs but where does TP \1+! and TP\+!# > comes into picture, is it when someone tries to call from missed/recvd > calls. > > I am not also able to follow on Page 81, it says if BR1 Ph2 calls > +12123942123 ---there si duplicate match pattern > > \+! / pt-blocj-intl (TP) > > \+1[2-9]xx[2-9]xxxxxxx / pt-nanp-tp (TP) >>>>where did we create this > TP ??? can't follow the logic here ??? > > Thanks for your help !!! > > AK > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com > > -- Regards, Otto Sanchez CCIE #25592 (Voice) Support Engineer - IPexpert, Inc. URL: http://www.IPexpert.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_voice/attachments/20100114/4fb65a6 9/attachment-0001.htm ------------------------------ Message: 5 Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 19:51:27 -0430 From: Otto Sanchez <o...@ipexpert.com> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Trying to upgrade a 7960 in CUCME from SCCP to SIP To: Kevin Hobson <kevin.hobson2...@ntlworld.com> Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Message-ID: <be6b39441001141621m26b40cbcj5bf2031eb75a...@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Hello, What phone load version/protocol is the phone you're trying to update? Please check the following link to see the procedure on how to upgrade phone's sip firmware and whether the current version can be directly upgraded to your desired version, http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucme/admin/configuration/guid e/cmeinstl.html#wp1067416 The OS79XX.TXT file was the method to tell phone with old image versions which firmware version it should load, so currently this file has the P0S3-07-4-00 text into it, as you will see in the link the upgrade command under voice register global configuration modifies the OS79XX.TXT content with what you configure in the load command, in that way an old SIP firmware phone can be progressively upgraded, HTH, On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 8:56 AM, Kevin Hobson <kevin.hobson2...@ntlworld.com > wrote: > Hi, > > I am pulling my hair out trying to upgrade a 7960 phone to SIP in CUCME. > > The problem i have is the phone is requesting a signed image > P0S3-07-4-00.sbn that didn't even come in the zip. > > Debug tftp events below: > > Jan 14 17:22:40.613: TFTP: Looking for OS79XX.TXT > Jan 14 17:22:40.617: TFTP: Opened flash:/OS79XX.TXT, fd 7, size 13 for > process 221 > Jan 14 17:22:40.617: TFTP: Finished flash:/OS79XX.TXT, time 00:00:00 for > process 221 > Jan 14 17:22:45.057: TFTP: Looking for P0S3-07-4-00.sbn > > > > Anyone seen this before? > > Any help appreciated. > > Thanks > > Kev > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_voice/attachments/20100114/dbfbc9e 8/attachment-0001.htm ------------------------------ Message: 6 Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 19:59:38 -0500 (EST) From: larry Stern <ste...@optonline.net> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol2 Final Configs Folders Labs 1-4 To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Message-ID: <31653138.230927.1263517178700.javamail.ste...@mail.srv.hntnny1.cv.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed; delsp=no On the downloaded files from IP Expert, I noticed in the folder Labeled VOL2 configs, once unzipped and opened all the final config folders are blank for LABS 1-4, LAB 5 does contain a final config, any reason for this or is this just an oversite?. Thanks Larry ------------------------------ Message: 7 Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 21:26:28 -0430 From: Otto Sanchez <o...@ipexpert.com> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gateway Calling/Called Number Plan To: Jeff Knuckle <jknuc...@nationwidelab.com> Cc: "ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com" <ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com>, "Berry, Matthew J." <mjbe...@krollontrack.com> Message-ID: <be6b39441001141756sf86ec48t465b124aadcd8...@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Jeff, You are right, I was talking about Called/Calling Number Type, however, I think Matthew was referring to Calling/Called Party Numbering Plan setting (isdn, private, national standard, etc), or Numbering Plan Identification (NPI) ISDN Setup Field, which I would set only if required by the telco, Regards, On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 10:00 AM, Jeff Knuckle <jknuc...@nationwidelab.com>wrote: > Hmmm?. I was under the impression that you can specify the Numbering Plan > on Route Pattern, Translation Pattern, Transformation Pattern and Route > List/Group only when using the special character ?...@? ( e.g. 9.@) but you > cannot specify the Numbering Type. > > > > > > * **Jeff * > > > > *From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto: > ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *On Behalf Of *Otto Sanchez > *Sent:* Thursday, January 14, 2010 7:47 AM > *To:* Berry, Matthew J. > *Cc:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com > *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gateway Calling/Called Number Plan > > > > Matthew, > > To address your first question, you can set the calling/called number type > in different places, ie, translation patterns, route patterns, route group > in route list configuration, called/calling tranformation pattern, gateway. > So depending on the call destination you can set a different called/calling > number type, there?s no need to have a different gw/circuit per different > number types, you may only have a single circuit to route all these > different calls, > > And for the second question, some service providers may ask you to send > outgoing calls with an specific format and number type depending on the > destination, before they can actually route the call, ie for us long > distance calls they may require you send the call with National number type > and [2-9]XX[2-9]XXXXXX number format (not including the national call prefix > of 1), > > HTH, > > On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 9:06 PM, Berry, Matthew J. < > mjbe...@krollontrack.com> wrote: > > Is there any real value to setting the numbering plan? Perhaps for plus > dialing? > - Sent from my Blackberry > > > ------------------------------ > > *From*: Jeff Knuckle <jknuc...@nationwidelab.com> > *To*: Berry, Matthew J.; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com < > ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com> > *Sent*: Wed Jan 13 16:28:28 2010 > *Subject*: RE: Gateway Calling/Called Number Plan > > You can set the Numbering type at the circuit level on a MGCP gateway, on a > H.323 gateway , you can set the Numbering type at the dial-peer level. > Therefore, on MGCP gateway, you would need separate circuits for each > numbering type whereas on the H.323 gateway, you would need separate > dial-peer for each numbering plan but all the dial-peers can point to a > single circuit. > > > > Hope that helps. > > > > * **Jeff * > > > > *From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto: > ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *On Behalf Of *Berry, Matthew J. > *Sent:* Wednesday, January 13, 2010 4:46 PM > *To:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com > *Subject:* [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gateway Calling/Called Number Plan > > > > All ? > > > > If I have a gateway with two circuits that are used to route outbound local > and long distance calls, what/where do I need to set the calling/called > number plan? It seems to be that if I set the called number plan to > SUBSCRIBER (for the sake of outbound local calls), all *long distance*calls going through that same gateway would also be tagged as SUBSCRIBER and > not NATIONAL. > > > > Does anyone understand what I?m getting at? It?d be much easier if we had > separate gateways and circuits for local, long-distance, and internal. > > > > Thanks, > > * * > > *Matthew Berry*, Sr. Unified Communications Engineer, CCVP > > Kroll Ontrack | 9023 Columbine Road, Eden Prairie, MN 55347 > > 952 516 3748 | Fax 952 516 3646 | Mobile 952 221 2814| > mjbe...@krollontrack.com <agutz...@krollontrack.com> > www.krollontrack.com > > > > > _______________________________________________ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com > > > > > -- > Regards, > > Otto Sanchez > CCIE #25592 (Voice) > Support Engineer - IPexpert, Inc. > URL: http://www.IPexpert.com > -- Regards, Otto Sanchez CCIE #25592 (Voice) Support Engineer - IPexpert, Inc. URL: http://www.IPexpert.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_voice/attachments/20100114/edcc509 5/attachment.htm ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ CCIE_Voice mailing list CCIE_Voice@onlinestudylist.com http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice End of CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 47, Issue 58 ****************************************** __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 4773 (20100114) __________ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 4773 (20100114) __________ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
