Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] NM-CUE integration with CUCM

2013-12-11 Thread Chandan Ug
Hi , Any one passed CCIE voice in Lab 7 or Lab 8 - if yes kindly send me the solutions. Thank you Chandan On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 10:43 PM, Ramcharan Arya ramcharan.a...@gmail.comwrote: Check you WAN QoS policy. Fragmentation may cause this issue. Thanks Ramcharan Arya CCIE

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab 4 HQ to Site C voicemail giving fast busy

2013-12-11 Thread aman sinha
I have this same issue. Any solutions ? What am I missing ? http://www.voiceie.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=8;t=002216 Regards, Aman ___ Free CCIE RS, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless Security Videos :: iPexpert on YouTube:

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab 4 HQ to Site C voicemail giving fast busy

2013-12-11 Thread aman sinha
Thanks, Found problem - sdspfarm transcode sessions 2 was missing in telephony-services. On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 12:53 PM, aman sinha aman.i...@gmail.com wrote: This is codec negotiation issue. Transcoder is not is not working. HQ to Site C is g729ulaw, while CUE uses G711ulaw. I verified

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab 4 HQ to Site C voicemail giving fast busy

2013-12-11 Thread aman sinha
This is codec negotiation issue. Transcoder is not is not working. HQ to Site C is g729ulaw, while CUE uses G711ulaw. I verified by using G711ulaw between HQ and SiteC. Everything worked fine. What did I miss in transcoder? On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 12:28 PM, aman sinha aman.i...@gmail.com