Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Route Patterns

2013-10-11 Thread William Bell

Not sure what you would like explained.

9011.! and 9011.!#  are for international dialing from North America. Both 
patterns include a dot (.) which will allow you to apply a digit transform 
action of pre-dot, if you want. The exclamation (!) is a wild card and 
instructs the digit analysis process to continue accepting dialed digits 
(0-9,*). The hash is treated as a termination character. Since ! says I'll 
keep taking digits until inter-digit timeout expires you sometimes want to 
provide a way for users to expedite the digit analysis. The # gets you there 
and you need a route pattern to handle that digit. 

The 9.1(2-9)xx[2-9]xx  is an invalid pattern. Parens are not acceptable 
characters for route patterns.

-Bill


--
William Bell, CCIE #38914
blog: http://ucguerrilla.com
twitter: @ucguerrilla




On Oct 10, 2013, at 9:30 PM, Anthony Nwachukwu wrote:

 Hi,
 
 Can someone explain the Route Patterns below.
 
 9.1(2-9)XX[2-9]XX
 9011.!
 9011.!#
 
 9.1(2-9)XX[2-9]XX
 
 Cheers
 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
 visit www.ipexpert.com
 
 Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
 www.PlatinumPlacement.com

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MVA confusion and quesiton

2013-10-11 Thread ramesh

hi All,

Thanks for your responses.

One of the things I noticed was ifnbsp; I do not manipulate the calling number 
from 525 to 9525nbsp; then while placing a call directlynbsp; from 
the pstn line 525 tonbsp; SBPh1nbsp; goes to voicemail or fails .

Is this expected behavior?


-Ramesh



From: Bill Lake lt;whl...@gmail.comgt;
Sent: Mon, 07 Oct 2013 18:17:34 
To: Martin Sloan lt;martinsloa...@gmail.comgt;
Cc: ramesh lt;rameshdol...@rediffmail.comgt;, ccie_voice 
lt;ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.comgt;
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MVA confusion and quesiton
  On Number 2 you should remember in 7.0.x there is a bug with partial match 
and you might not want to risk hitting it

Bill
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 7, 2013, at 7:43 AM, Martin Sloan lt;martinsloa...@gmail.comgt; wrote:

Hi Ramesh,

Here's some answers based on my approach to configuring MVA.

1)nbsp; I would use the 4 digit number for my dial-peer and CUCM MVA number 
(3300).nbsp; Since you probably already have a translation-profile in place on 
the voice port or inbound dial-peer to chop the called number down to 4 digits, 
it makes sense to use that.


2) I don't change the calling party number and I use 'complete match' on the 
service parameter.nbsp; I set my remote destination to that full number 
(either 7 or 10 digits).

3) No manipulation required, just set the remote destination to the full number.


Marty


On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 9:52 AM, ramesh lt;rameshdol...@rediffmail.comgt; 
wrote:


Hi San,

Thanks for your reply.

1) So you're suggestion is to use 3300 or 3033300 ?

2)At the dial-peer level are you using 3300 or 3033300?nbsp; 



I way I use it is as given below : -
=

(a) If I use 3300 at the dial-peer levelnbsp; and on the callmanger as MVA 
numbernbsp; with 525 as the calling party numbernbsp; then Inbsp; 
amnbsp; ablenbsp; to havenbsp; MVA functionality .nbsp; 


(b)nbsp; Inbsp; normally call from the pstn using 3033300 from line 525( 
pstn phone)nbsp; thennbsp;nbsp; on my h323 gatewaynbsp; I strip the called 
number to last 4 digits and send to the callmanger .nbsp; 

(c) On the callmanger my MVA number is 3300.



Arenbsp; the above steps ( a to b )nbsp; correct?


Regards,
Ramesh





From: san r lt;luv...@gmail.comgt;
Sent: Sun, 06 Oct 2013 13:37:52 

To: ramesh lt;rameshdol...@rediffmail.comgt;
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MVA confusion and quesiton

if you're stripping number for MVA , then mostly it wont work. Should use the 
exactly same number in Dial peer amp; and CCM MVA configurations.

I had the same issue in lab


On Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 8:12 PM, ramesh lt;rameshdol...@rediffmail.comgt; 
wrote:


Hello Guys,

I have the following questions for MVA.


1) I am 
followingnbsp; a 4 digitnbsp; internal dial-plan fornbsp; my site B 
phonesnbsp; and 
there is a requirement that I usenbsp; 3033300nbsp; ( 7 digit number )nbsp; 
as my 
MVA numbernbsp;nbsp; thennbsp; can strip this 7 digit number tonbsp; the 
last 4 digitnbsp; number (nbsp; 3300 ) as my MVA number ?

2) Alsonbsp; my calling number isnbsp; a 7 digit number coming from 
pstnnbsp; as 525nbsp; then do I change it to 9525?



3) If incase calling number isnbsp; a 10 digit numbernbsp; then It would come 
into site B as 972525 ( which is 10 digits) is manipulation required for 
this or can I just use the complete match with 10 digits on the service 
parameter level?




-Ramesh Dollar





Get your own FREE website,  FREE domain amp; FREE mobile app with Company 
email. nbsp;

Know More gt;


___

For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com



Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com




Get your own FREE website,  FREE domain amp; FREE mobile app with Company 
email. nbsp;
Know More gt;

___

For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com



Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com  
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Voice Lab routing issue

2013-10-11 Thread Fredenberg, Cliff
Site A router f0/0 is connected to switch port 1/0/1 right? The switch has the 
native vlan set but the router does not.

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Dane Warner
Sent: Friday, October 11, 2013 4:09 PM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Voice Lab routing issue

All,

I've put together my voice lab and I'm having a routing issue which is 
preventing me from completing the setup.

From SiteA-rtr, I cannot ping 10.10.100.3 on the 3750. The switch cannot ping 
10.10.100.1 on the router.
I have the PSTN-WAN router connected to f1/0/24 on the switch.
From PSTN router I can ping 10.10.100.3 but not 10.10.100.1.
The servers can all talk to each other, and the SiteA router can ping the 
servers, but the servers cannot ping 10.10.100.2 (NTP).
It seems to be the connection from Switch port 1 to SiteA router subinterface 
for VLAN 101 only.
The initial configurations came directly from Proctorlabs and I've edited from 
there.
Can anyone take a look and see what I'm missing. It must be something obvious 
but I'm not seeing it.

Thanks much,


Dane Warner, CCVP
Sr. Network Engineer
Epoch Universal, Inc.
(909)226-0755
dwar...@epochuniversal.commailto:dwar...@epochuniversal.com
[Epoch_Logo_Smaller_Transparent]

From: 
ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.commailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
 [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Karen Johnson
Sent: Monday, October 07, 2013 10:20 AM
To: Ramcharan Arya; Josh Petro
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.commailto:ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com; 
sanity insanity
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ccie written

hi Arya and all,

when you have 2 ccie specialization, do you need to write WRITTEN exam for both 
or just one ?

K

From: Ramcharan Arya ramcharan.a...@gmail.commailto:ramcharan.a...@gmail.com
To: Josh Petro josh.pe...@gmail.commailto:josh.pe...@gmail.com
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.commailto:ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com 
ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.commailto:ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com; sanity 
insanity 
networksanitytoinsan...@gmail.commailto:networksanitytoinsan...@gmail.com
Sent: Wednesday, October 2, 2013 6:59:08 PM
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Presence - on hook and off hook status

Hi Josh,
I do not believe it is related to vmware environment. I am assuming your CUPS 
is integrated with CUCM using SIP trunk.

Can you enable SIP debug level to detail and run collect SIP debug logs ( on 
primary call processing engine i.e. Sub) and check SIP logs  why there is delay 
in status.?
Im my home lab I never had this issue it works almost instantly my CUPS client 
is installed on UCCX server.
Regards,
Ramcharan Arya CCIE # 28926 ( Voice/RS)

On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 7:47 PM, Josh Petro 
josh.pe...@gmail.commailto:josh.pe...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a huge delay in my presence updates on my system. Im assuming 
thatapos;s from CUPS being installed in my lab vmware environment though. Try 
to go off hook or call a pstn number and let it sit for 1-2 minutes. If anyone 
knows how to fix the lag, please let me know. Im assuming its related to vmware.
Josh
On Oct 1, 2013 11:20 AM, Ovidiu Popa 
ovi.p...@gmail.commailto:ovi.p...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi

You could try a reboot of the CUPS server. Worked for me a couple of times...

Cheers,
Ovidiu

On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 4:43 PM, Martin Sloan 
martinsloa...@gmail.commailto:martinsloa...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi MJ,

Is the end user assigned on the line level of the hard phone?  That assignment 
is unique per line appearance so if you make the association on the CUPC device 
it does not automatically populate to the hard phone/any other line appearance. 
 When the phone goes off-hook CUCM checks the end user assignment for that 
appearance and if there is an end user assigned it check whether that end user 
is assigned CUP licensing to decide if the publish message is sent over the 
CUPS SIP trunk.
BR,
Marty

On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 10:29 AM, sanity insanity 
networksanitytoinsan...@gmail.commailto:networksanitytoinsan...@gmail.com 
wrote:
Hello all,
I have configured presence and both softphone and deskphone modes , IM  and 
voicemail is working fine on the clients
However I have a question when I lift the handset of the phone ( hard phone ) 
that is assoicated
with the CUPC clients . I see that the presence status does not showOn the 
phone   and does not turn yellow.
I have tried reseting my sip trunk pointing to the presence server yet I see 
the same issue.
Please let me know what can be done to fix this ?  Also is this  a major issue ?
-MJ

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
http://www.ipexpert.com/

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
http://www.platinumplacement.com/


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, 

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Voice Lab routing issue

2013-10-11 Thread Justin Carney
Without seeing your config it sounds like a vlan mismatch between switch
and router.

Make sure your switchport facing the router is trunking and the router has
subinterfaces with the correct vlan tag.  Native vlan number will also need
to match.

If you post those relevant parts of the config I can review.
On Oct 11, 2013 5:15 PM, Dane Warner dwar...@epochuniversal.com wrote:

 All,

 ** **

 I’ve put together my voice lab and I’m having a routing issue which is
 preventing me from completing the setup.

 ** **

 From SiteA-rtr, I cannot ping 10.10.100.3 on the 3750. The switch cannot
 ping 10.10.100.1 on the router. 

 I have the PSTN-WAN router connected to f1/0/24 on the switch. 

 From PSTN router I can ping 10.10.100.3 but not 10.10.100.1.

 The servers can all talk to each other, and the SiteA router can ping the
 servers, but the servers cannot ping 10.10.100.2 (NTP).

 It seems to be the connection from Switch port 1 to SiteA router
 subinterface for VLAN 101 only.

 The initial configurations came directly from Proctorlabs and I’ve edited
 from there.

 Can anyone take a look and see what I’m missing. It must be something
 obvious but I’m not seeing it.

 ** **

 Thanks much,

 ** **

 ** **

 *Dane Warner, CCVP*

 *Sr. Network Engineer*

 *Epoch Universal, Inc.*

 *(909)226-0755*

 *dwar...@epochuniversal.com  *

 *[image: Epoch_Logo_Smaller_Transparent]*

 ** **

 *From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:
 ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *On Behalf Of *Karen Johnson
 *Sent:* Monday, October 07, 2013 10:20 AM
 *To:* Ramcharan Arya; Josh Petro
 *Cc:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com; sanity insanity
 *Subject:* [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ccie written

 ** **

 hi Arya and all,

  

 when you have 2 ccie specialization, do you need to write WRITTEN exam for
 both or just one ?

  

 K

 ** **

 *From:* Ramcharan Arya ramcharan.a...@gmail.com
 *To:* Josh Petro josh.pe...@gmail.com
 *Cc:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com;
 sanity insanity networksanitytoinsan...@gmail.com
 *Sent:* Wednesday, October 2, 2013 6:59:08 PM
 *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Presence - on hook and off hook status**
 **

 ** **

 Hi Josh,

 I do not believe it is related to vmware environment. I am assuming your
 CUPS is integrated with CUCM using SIP trunk.


 Can you enable SIP debug level to detail and run collect SIP debug logs (
 on primary call processing engine i.e. Sub) and check SIP logs  why there
 is delay in status.?

 Im my home lab I never had this issue it works almost instantly my CUPS
 client is installed on UCCX server.

 Regards,
 Ramcharan Arya CCIE # 28926 ( Voice/RS)

 ** **

 On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 7:47 PM, Josh Petro josh.pe...@gmail.com wrote:**
 **

 I have a huge delay in my presence updates on my system. Im assuming
 thatapos;s from CUPS being installed in my lab vmware environment though.
 Try to go off hook or call a pstn number and let it sit for 1-2 minutes. If
 anyone knows how to fix the lag, please let me know. Im assuming its
 related to vmware.
 Josh

 On Oct 1, 2013 11:20 AM, Ovidiu Popa ovi.p...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi

 ** **

 You could try a reboot of the CUPS server. Worked for me a couple of
 times... 

 ** **

 Cheers, 

 Ovidiu

 ** **

 On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 4:43 PM, Martin Sloan martinsloa...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 Hi MJ,

 Is the end user assigned on the line level of the hard phone?  That
 assignment is unique per line appearance so if you make the association on
 the CUPC device it does not automatically populate to the hard phone/any
 other line appearance.  When the phone goes off-hook CUCM checks the end
 user assignment for that appearance and if there is an end user assigned it
 check whether that end user is assigned CUP licensing to decide if the
 publish message is sent over the CUPS SIP trunk.

 BR,
 Marty

 ** **

 On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 10:29 AM, sanity insanity 
 networksanitytoinsan...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hello all,

 I have configured presence and both softphone and deskphone modes , IM
 and voicemail is working fine on the clients

 However I have a question when I lift the handset of the phone ( hard
 phone ) that is assoicated

 with the CUPC clients . I see that the presence status does not show  
 On the phone   and does not turn yellow.

 I have tried reseting my sip trunk pointing to the presence server yet I
 see the same issue.

 Please let me know what can be done to fix this ?  Also is this  a major
 issue ?

 -MJ

 ** **

 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
 visit http://www.ipexpert.com/

 Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
 http://www.platinumplacement.com/

 ** **


 ___
 For more information 

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Voice Lab routing issue

2013-10-11 Thread Dane Warner
Thank you very much. One word makes all the difference:
Encapsulation dot1q 'native'

Back on track again.

Kind regards,

Dane Warner, CCVP
Sr. Network Engineer
Epoch Universal, Inc.
(909)226-0755
dwar...@epochuniversal.commailto:dwar...@epochuniversal.com
[cid:image001.png@01CEC691.B7BC94B0]

From: Fredenberg, Cliff [mailto:cliff.fredenb...@corebts.com]
Sent: Friday, October 11, 2013 2:28 PM
To: Dane Warner; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: RE: Voice Lab routing issue

Site A router f0/0 is connected to switch port 1/0/1 right? The switch has the 
native vlan set but the router does not.

From: 
ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.commailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
 [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Dane Warner
Sent: Friday, October 11, 2013 4:09 PM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.commailto:ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Voice Lab routing issue

All,

I've put together my voice lab and I'm having a routing issue which is 
preventing me from completing the setup.

From SiteA-rtr, I cannot ping 10.10.100.3 on the 3750. The switch cannot ping 
10.10.100.1 on the router.
I have the PSTN-WAN router connected to f1/0/24 on the switch.
From PSTN router I can ping 10.10.100.3 but not 10.10.100.1.
The servers can all talk to each other, and the SiteA router can ping the 
servers, but the servers cannot ping 10.10.100.2 (NTP).
It seems to be the connection from Switch port 1 to SiteA router subinterface 
for VLAN 101 only.
The initial configurations came directly from Proctorlabs and I've edited from 
there.
Can anyone take a look and see what I'm missing. It must be something obvious 
but I'm not seeing it.

Thanks much,


Dane Warner, CCVP
Sr. Network Engineer
Epoch Universal, Inc.
(909)226-0755
dwar...@epochuniversal.commailto:dwar...@epochuniversal.com
[cid:image001.png@01CEC691.B7BC94B0]

From: 
ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.commailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
 [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Karen Johnson
Sent: Monday, October 07, 2013 10:20 AM
To: Ramcharan Arya; Josh Petro
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.commailto:ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com; 
sanity insanity
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ccie written

hi Arya and all,

when you have 2 ccie specialization, do you need to write WRITTEN exam for both 
or just one ?

K

From: Ramcharan Arya ramcharan.a...@gmail.commailto:ramcharan.a...@gmail.com
To: Josh Petro josh.pe...@gmail.commailto:josh.pe...@gmail.com
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.commailto:ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com 
ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.commailto:ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com; sanity 
insanity 
networksanitytoinsan...@gmail.commailto:networksanitytoinsan...@gmail.com
Sent: Wednesday, October 2, 2013 6:59:08 PM
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Presence - on hook and off hook status

Hi Josh,
I do not believe it is related to vmware environment. I am assuming your CUPS 
is integrated with CUCM using SIP trunk.

Can you enable SIP debug level to detail and run collect SIP debug logs ( on 
primary call processing engine i.e. Sub) and check SIP logs  why there is delay 
in status.?
Im my home lab I never had this issue it works almost instantly my CUPS client 
is installed on UCCX server.
Regards,
Ramcharan Arya CCIE # 28926 ( Voice/RS)

On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 7:47 PM, Josh Petro 
josh.pe...@gmail.commailto:josh.pe...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a huge delay in my presence updates on my system. Im assuming 
thatapos;s from CUPS being installed in my lab vmware environment though. Try 
to go off hook or call a pstn number and let it sit for 1-2 minutes. If anyone 
knows how to fix the lag, please let me know. Im assuming its related to vmware.
Josh
On Oct 1, 2013 11:20 AM, Ovidiu Popa 
ovi.p...@gmail.commailto:ovi.p...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi

You could try a reboot of the CUPS server. Worked for me a couple of times...

Cheers,
Ovidiu

On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 4:43 PM, Martin Sloan 
martinsloa...@gmail.commailto:martinsloa...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi MJ,

Is the end user assigned on the line level of the hard phone?  That assignment 
is unique per line appearance so if you make the association on the CUPC device 
it does not automatically populate to the hard phone/any other line appearance. 
 When the phone goes off-hook CUCM checks the end user assignment for that 
appearance and if there is an end user assigned it check whether that end user 
is assigned CUP licensing to decide if the publish message is sent over the 
CUPS SIP trunk.
BR,
Marty

On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 10:29 AM, sanity insanity 
networksanitytoinsan...@gmail.commailto:networksanitytoinsan...@gmail.com 
wrote:
Hello all,
I have configured presence and both softphone and deskphone modes , IM  and 
voicemail is working fine on the clients
However I have a question when I lift the handset of the phone ( hard phone ) 
that is assoicated
with the CUPC clients . I see that the presence status does not showOn the 
phone   and