Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] which route pattern discard digits includes even # dialing
Actually, you could use the pattern 9.011![0-9#] to cover both dialing scenarios with one pattern. -Bill -- William Bell, CCIE #38914 blog: http://ucguerrilla.com twitter: @ucguerrilla On Oct 11, 2013, at 9:42 PM, Justin Carney wrote: You need both patterns. The first step is matching a route, then digit manipulation is applied. The two patterns are used to match international calls with variable length digits both with and without dialing #. You need the one with # when the question states something like give users the ability to avoid interdigit timeout. This pattern will only match when user dials the # and you could use predot trailing # for ddi. The pattern without # will only match if a user does not dial # and t302 timer expires. The only time you can get away with only one pattern is if the question says you do NOT need to give users a way to avoid interdigit timeout. My strategy is to always use both patterns unless the question says prevent users from avoiding interdigit timeout in which case this extra config with the # pattern would cause you to lose those points. On Oct 11, 2013 12:59 PM, virajith vir...@rediffmail.com wrote: Hello, I wanted to know which discard digits option in route pattern includes both 9011.! and 9011!# dialing . So that only 1 route pattern is created instead of 2 for dialing without and with #. -Vir Get your own FREE website, FREE domain FREE mobile app with Company email. Know More ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] which route pattern discard digits includes even # dialing
Nice! I wonder why training material doesn't use that method, I just assumed two patterns was the best/only way and never thought about trying to combine them. On Oct 12, 2013 9:13 AM, William Bell b...@ucguerrilla.com wrote: Actually, you could use the pattern 9.011![0-9#] to cover both dialing scenarios with one pattern. -Bill -- William Bell, CCIE #38914 blog: http://ucguerrilla.com twitter: @ucguerrilla On Oct 11, 2013, at 9:42 PM, Justin Carney wrote: You need both patterns. The first step is matching a route, then digit manipulation is applied. The two patterns are used to match international calls with variable length digits both with and without dialing #. You need the one with # when the question states something like give users the ability to avoid interdigit timeout. This pattern will only match when user dials the # and you could use predot trailing # for ddi. The pattern without # will only match if a user does not dial # and t302 timer expires. The only time you can get away with only one pattern is if the question says you do NOT need to give users a way to avoid interdigit timeout. My strategy is to always use both patterns unless the question says prevent users from avoiding interdigit timeout in which case this extra config with the # pattern would cause you to lose those points. On Oct 11, 2013 12:59 PM, virajith vir...@rediffmail.com wrote: Hello, I wanted to know which discard digits option in route pattern includes both 9011.! and 9011!# dialing . So that only 1 route pattern is created instead of 2 for dialing without and with #. -Vir http://sigads.rediff.com/RealMedia/ads/click_nx.ads/www.rediffmail.com/signatureline.htm@Middle? Get your own *FREE* website, *FREE* domain *FREE* mobile app with Company email. *Know More *http://track.rediff.com/click?url=___http://businessemail.rediff.com/company-email-hosting-services?sc_cid=sign-1-10-13___cmp=hostlnk=sign-1-10-13nsrv1=host ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] CFNA to CUE issue
I can't call forward no answer to goto CUE from the PSTN. If I hit the messages button it works fine and if I dial the pilot number works fine. dial-peer voice 2000 voip description ** cue voicemail pilot number ** destination-pattern 800. b2bua session protocol sipv2 session target ipv4:192.168.90.2 dtmf-relay sip-notify codec g711ulaw no vad telephony-service sdspfarm units 1 sdspfarm transcode sessions 40 sdspfarm tag 1 mtp123456792012 max-ephones 10 max-dn 25 ip source-address 192.168.15.1 port 2000 system message LAB url services http://192.168.90.2/voiceview/common/login.do url authentication http://192.168.90.2/voiceview/authentication/authenticate.do load 7945 SCCP45.9-1-1SR1S time-zone 12 voicemail 8000 max-conferences 8 gain -6 call-forward pattern .T web admin system name admin password cc1e2007 dn-webedit time-webedit transfer-system full-consult create cnf-files version-stamp 7960 Oct 12 2013 08:45:50 ! ! ephone-dn 1 octo-line number 4866 no-reg primary label Mike - 4866 description 3025254866 name Mike call-forward busy 8000 call-forward noan 8000 timeout 6 no huntstop ! ! ephone-dn 2 number 4867 hold-alert 30 originator ! ! ephone-dn 15 number 7020 no-reg primary mwi off ! ! ephone-dn 16 number 7021 no-reg primary mwi on ! ! ephone 1 device-security-mode none mac-address 34A8.4EA6.EB0B ephone-template 15 type 7945 button 1:1 2:2 ! ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] End User to Device Association
Is there a quick and easy way to see which device an End User is associated with? Without having to run a report or going into the individual End User configuration. It is not an offered search under Find and List End User's. Thanks. Ryan Maxam Sent from my iPad ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] End User to Device Association
You could do a quick SQL query from the pub cli. I can't recall the table off hand but I will check it out when I get back to my computer. On Oct 12, 2013, at 10:47 AM, Ryan Maxam ryan.ma...@gmail.com wrote: Is there a quick and easy way to see which device an End User is associated with? Without having to run a report or going into the individual End User configuration. It is not an offered search under Find and List End User's. Thanks. Ryan Maxam Sent from my iPad ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] End User to Device Association
Hey Ryan, So the query isn't super simple but it's definitely something you could memorize for a quick look at user/device associations. The table that holds the relationship between the user and device is the enduserdevicemap table but all the records for user and device are references to the pkid's of the primary table so you have to join those in, the enduser and device table, to get the friendly names. Here's the query: run sql select enduser.userid,device.name from enduserdevicemap inner join enduser on enduser.pkid = enduserdevicemap.fkenduser inner join device on device.pkid = enduserdevicemap.fkdevice The results would give you something like this: userid name == === SBPH2 SEP1234567891236 HQPH2 SEP123456789125 SBPH1 SEP123456789124 HQPH1 SEP123456789123 HTH Marty On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 11:27 AM, Martin Sloan martinsloa...@gmail.comwrote: You could do a quick SQL query from the pub cli. I can't recall the table off hand but I will check it out when I get back to my computer. On Oct 12, 2013, at 10:47 AM, Ryan Maxam ryan.ma...@gmail.com wrote: Is there a quick and easy way to see which device an End User is associated with? Without having to run a report or going into the individual End User configuration. It is not an offered search under Find and List End User's. Thanks. Ryan Maxam Sent from my iPad ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] End User to Device Association
Does anyone know a good source for these type of searches or a good way to create them? Bill Sent from my iPhone On Oct 12, 2013, at 11:40 AM, Martin Sloan martinsloa...@gmail.com wrote: Hey Ryan, So the query isn't super simple but it's definitely something you could memorize for a quick look at user/device associations. The table that holds the relationship between the user and device is the enduserdevicemap table but all the records for user and device are references to the pkid's of the primary table so you have to join those in, the enduser and device table, to get the friendly names. Here's the query: run sql select enduser.userid,device.name from enduserdevicemap inner join enduser on enduser.pkid = enduserdevicemap.fkenduser inner join device on device.pkid = enduserdevicemap.fkdevice The results would give you something like this: userid name == === SBPH2 SEP1234567891236 HQPH2 SEP123456789125 SBPH1 SEP123456789124 HQPH1 SEP123456789123 HTH Marty On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 11:27 AM, Martin Sloan martinsloa...@gmail.com wrote: You could do a quick SQL query from the pub cli. I can't recall the table off hand but I will check it out when I get back to my computer. On Oct 12, 2013, at 10:47 AM, Ryan Maxam ryan.ma...@gmail.com wrote: Is there a quick and easy way to see which device an End User is associated with? Without having to run a report or going into the individual End User configuration. It is not an offered search under Find and List End User's. Thanks. Ryan Maxam Sent from my iPad ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] End User to Device Association
Bill, I put a bunch of these queries on my blog site (see sig. block). I used SQL queries to verify lab configs a fair amount. They are handy and quick. -Bill -- William Bell, CCIE #38914 blog: http://ucguerrilla.com twitter: @ucguerrilla On Oct 12, 2013, at 5:13 PM, Bill Lake wrote: Does anyone know a good source for these type of searches or a good way to create them? Bill Sent from my iPhone On Oct 12, 2013, at 11:40 AM, Martin Sloan martinsloa...@gmail.com wrote: Hey Ryan, So the query isn't super simple but it's definitely something you could memorize for a quick look at user/device associations. The table that holds the relationship between the user and device is the enduserdevicemap table but all the records for user and device are references to the pkid's of the primary table so you have to join those in, the enduser and device table, to get the friendly names. Here's the query: run sql select enduser.userid,device.name from enduserdevicemap inner join enduser on enduser.pkid = enduserdevicemap.fkenduser inner join device on device.pkid = enduserdevicemap.fkdevice The results would give you something like this: userid name == === SBPH2 SEP1234567891236 HQPH2 SEP123456789125 SBPH1 SEP123456789124 HQPH1 SEP123456789123 HTH Marty On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 11:27 AM, Martin Sloan martinsloa...@gmail.com wrote: You could do a quick SQL query from the pub cli. I can't recall the table off hand but I will check it out when I get back to my computer. On Oct 12, 2013, at 10:47 AM, Ryan Maxam ryan.ma...@gmail.com wrote: Is there a quick and easy way to see which device an End User is associated with? Without having to run a report or going into the individual End User configuration. It is not an offered search under Find and List End User's. Thanks. Ryan Maxam Sent from my iPad ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
