Hey Everyone,
What is the best resource(s) to learn the various UCCX scripting methods
needed for the lab? Does anyone have any good resources online? How
complicated is it likely to get for the lab and how much time should we
dedicate to this?
Thanks,
Roger
gw-priority 0 says never use this gateway for this prefix. Essentially
they are put there for completeness to ensure that BR2RTR is never used for
the HQ and BR1 routes.
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 6:00 AM, iy...@nationwide.com wrote:
I am a little confused with the solution for question 4.6
)
Homepage: http://www.i-1.nl
Blog: http://blog.i-1.nl
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/iwan_ccie
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/iwanhoogendoorn
*From:* Roger Henderson [mailto:rhender...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* zaterdag 27 maart 2010 16:18
*To:* Iwan Hoogendoorn
*Cc:* Arun Kumar; ar
I found one step to upgrading from SCCP to SIP that makes all the
difference.
Add:
tftp-server flash:SIP.xml (i think that's the filename from
memory - I just copy and paste from the debug tftp events).
To your config using the real MAC address (of course). Don't ask me why this
Sean,
That's a POTS dial-peer. Add it to a VOIP one too. :)
Roger
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 5:29 PM, sean hurricane shurric...@gmail.com wrote:
i had that in another dial-peer, see below:
dial-peer voice 1 pots
incoming called-number .
direct-inward-dial
dial-peer voice 1000 voip
Try setting the CTI Gateway under User Settings to the HQ-TCP one (I think)
on the Presence server. That's needed to get softphone mode going, so it's
worth a try. It's definitely not the VPN that's breaking things - I use the
VPN often.
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 2:16 PM, vccie2010
Try adding the following command:
tftp-server flash:SIP00131A1E579D.cnf
Shut down your fa0/3/1 interface then bring it back up and you'll find that
the phone opens the .cnf file successfully (works for me anyway).
Regards,
Roger
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 8:55 AM, amr gaber amrga...@gmail.com
It should show as unregistered with an IP address next to it (if you are
in the CTI Route Point Find screen). Do you have the IP address? If so, it
is all good.
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 7:31 PM, Mad Kiwi ccievoi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi everyone,
The IPMA / CTI Route Point seem to be setup as
I take that back. I was comparing it to my current CM/CUE lab which I forgot
was in SRST mode... My bad.
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 7:48 PM, Roger Henderson rhender...@gmail.comwrote:
It should show as unregistered with an IP address next to it (if you are
in the CTI Route Point Find screen). Do
Kevin,
I had this problem yesterday sending calls through my H323 gateway. It
turned out to be related to the IP Blue softphones which I'll wager you are
using, Kevin as your problem looks mighty similar. With the IP Blue
softphones the LAST softphone to startup will be able to send and receive
Try the table on this URL:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk652/tk698/technologies_tech_note09186a0080094ae2.shtml
Roger
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 12:17 AM, Jeff Cotter jcot...@voxns.com wrote:
There is a huge number of posts on this, and explanations are all over
the board. Trying to get a
Did you check the routing from BR2 to HQ? All your problems suggest a lack
of connectivity from BR2 to the rest of the network. It's not unknown for
the startup configs to be horribly wrong (they all are, intentionally or
not, I'm unsure) in one way or another, so that could be your issue
You could use a RL pointing to a LRG (defined in the device pool as say the
local call RG) for the local calls. For the Long distance calls you'd need
to use a specific RG.
Sorry this isn't much help but it's the best I can come up with as within a
site (for any given phone) you only have one
You're never going to get more than 100% bandwidth without upgrading your
link. :)
What you've got here is 3% (1/33 as shaped uses inverse logic), 32.3, 32.3,
32.3 as the 0 queues all share the remaining BW equally. That's all true
if my memory serves me correctly, anyhow.
Roger
On Thu, Apr 29,
Oops, Angel is right - I didn't notice your share command there (which
replaces the 32.3, 32.3, 32.3) with appropriate ratios.
Roger
2010/4/29 Angel Perez gorr...@hotmail.com
From QoS Entreprise 3.3
Campus QoS Design chapter:
CAT2970(config-if-range)# srr-queue bandwidth shape 3 0 0 0
These are the files on my Proctorlabs router:
103 2496963 Oct 19 2007 07:11:16 PHONE/7945-7965/apps45.8-3-2-27.sbn
104 585536 Oct 19 2007 07:11:14 PHONE/7945-7965/cnu45.8-3-2-27.sbn
105 2453202 Dec 18 2008 12:46:18 PHONE/7945-7965/cvm45sccp.8-3-2-27.sbn
106 326315 Oct 19 2007 07:11:18
-queue bandwidth share 1 70 25 5 ! Q2
gets 70% of remaining BW; Q3 gets 25% and Q4 gets 5
*Also the second statement shd be share 1 70 25 0 instead of
share 1 70 25 1 right pls ??
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 11:54 PM, Roger Henderson
rhender...@gmail.comwrote:
Oops, Angel
This is overkill but... you could put an ACL on your relevant interfaces
that looks something like: access-list 101 permit udp ho 1.1.1.1 any eq 123
If 1.1.1.1 is your loopback you should see packet matches on that entry.
HTH
Roger
On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 4:40 AM, vccie2010 vccie2...@gmail.com
The standard rule of a CCIE lab is that if a question doesn't specify
something, it doesn't matter (and hence we shouldn't care).
Roger
On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 10:17 AM, Sergio Polizer spoli...@hotmail.comwrote:
Hi,
While doing the Vol 2 workbooks I have observed that when site Br1 (ISDN
Can you post a show run on the HQ router?
On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 5:06 AM, Kalyan iyer kparam2...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I am working on vol2 lab1, trying to get the call from the HQ site to BR2.
I am done with the configs on the HQ for the GK and CUBE and on the BR2 RTR.
I am unable to
I doubt you'll pass without it, Tom. The competitor's offerings aren't very
good.
On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 6:12 PM, A A f...@hotmail.com wrote:
Please check ipexpert.com for details. Just wanted to say yes, It is
definitly worth to have.
Ahmad Azeem
--
Date: Sun,
I found the multilab software really buggy (it crashed every time I
registered a phone), so I use the current version of VTGO-Advanced with the
/d switch (for multiple devices) - it works great (although only simulates
7961's and has some shortcomings).
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 4:48 AM, Ravindra
They're on the desktop of the UCCX server in a folder called 'Student.
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 7:19 PM, Dave Wong dwch...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
I'm having problems with the UCCX section for labs 6 and 7. I can't find
the answer scripts ( .aef files) that are used for these sections of the lab
Hey All,
Is anyone else having trouble with Proctorlabs? My session just dropped out
and I can't contact the website to seek assistance or connect via VPN.
Roger
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit
, 2010 at 8:40 PM, Roger Henderson rhender...@gmail.comwrote:
Hey All,
Is anyone else having trouble with Proctorlabs? My session just dropped
out and I can't contact the website to seek assistance or connect via VPN.
Roger
___
For more
OK, now Proctorlabs.com is unreachable. Again. It's been going up and down
for any hour or so, but seems down now. And yes, I flushed my DNS cache
;)
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 2:11 PM, Roger Henderson rhender...@gmail.comwrote:
It's back up now - my connectivity was only down for 2 minutes
They are. :)
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 11:23 AM, vccie2010 vccie2...@gmail.com wrote:
I beleive my requests are not getting posted on the list please ???
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 4:20 PM, vccie2010 vccie2...@gmail.com wrote:
When I call from PSTN into the MVA number and enter the RDP no it does
Try rebooting the router if nothing else works.
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 9:09 AM, kerboute kerboute
naoufal.kerbo...@cbi.mawrote:
Hi IP Expert,
I'm working on lab 5A Vol 1, on pod14 and i cannot get T1 layer2 for BR1
to be multiframe-established.
My config is correct.
BR1-RTR#sh isdn
From what I can tell the main purpose of an MTP is address translation. When
an MTP intercedes in the call the call appears to have originated from the
MTP from the perspective of the called party, at least as far as the IP
addressing is concerned.
They are also useful with RSVP to act as RSVP
Is there an RP pointing directly at the BR1(MGCP) gateway? Check the
dependency records for the gateway if you aren't sure.
Roger
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 8:23 AM, Randall Crumm
randall.cr...@harmonicinc.com wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to create a RG for BR1(MGCP) and it is not available in the
No.
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 1:49 PM, Matthew Berry ciscovoiceg...@gmail.comwrote:
If the lab does not specifically ask for Subscriber, National,
International types, would it be best to configure those anyway?
I don't want to over-configure, but I'm not sure if they're expecting you
do it
31 matches
Mail list logo
