Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Strange CUCM--->GK--->BACD Issue

[Duy Nguyen]

Post the config

"Kevin Hogan (kevhogan)"  wrote:

>Call from CUCM to CME BACD (lab v2 code)...
> 
>1) Works fine on the first call from CUCM and CONTINUES to work fine IF
>I actually push a key on the CUCM phone so that BACD can route the call
>to the appropriate hunt list.
>2) Works fine on the first call from CUCM, but FAILS to work on
>subsequent calls IF I do NOT push a key (call, hear greeting and hang-up
>without selecting an option).  I get dead air.  This behavior continues
>until I reload the router (stopping and starting the BACD application
>doesn't help).  A debug voice dialpeer all shows everything the exact
>same except the last line I get this on the call that works and not on
>the call that fails
> 
>*May 24 17:56:15.259: %IVR-6-APP_INFO: TCL B-ACD:  >>> B-ACD Service
>Started <<<
> 
>-Not an issue with dialpeers as it works most of the time (and hitting
>same DP's when it fails), xcoders are working when the call works (g729
>on the GK trunk). 
> 
>Any ideas?
> 
> 
> 

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Toll Fraud

[Duy Nguyen]

Service param, offnet to offnet = false.  For cme, tansfer pattern 

James Oberhaus  wrote:

>If I wanted to prevent toll fraud at HQ, BR1 and BR2 by only allowing uses
>to forward 4 digits what would be the best/fastest approach?  I assume at
>BR2 the easiest would be
>ephone-dn 1
>call-forward max-length 4
>
>Is there any option in UCM other then a CSS in the Call Forward line of
>every phone?  And what is the best way to approach that?  Sometimes Internal
>CSS will have items with more than 4 digits that you use for other things
>like translations.
>
>Thanks -
>James

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ver3 Lab setup- help needed

[Duy Nguyen]

Try speed 100/full.

vineet sanghi  wrote:

>
>I am getting following message on switch port which connects to VM machine.
>
>0:49:01: %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH: duplex mismatch discovered on 
>GigabitEthernet1/0/1 (not half duplex), with cucx eth0 (half duplex).
>10:49:08: %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH: duplex mismatch discovered on 
>GigabitEthernet1/0/1 (not half duplex), with pub71 eth0 (half duplex).
>10:49:18: %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH: duplex mismatch discovered on 
>GigabitEthernet1/0/1 (not half duplex), with sub710 eth0 (half duplex)
>
>I am running PUB,SUB & Unity connection only at the moment and all machines 
>are showing error on switch port. Moreover when ip phone calls to unity 
>connection from the same switch the voice is crackly. seems like packets are 
>being lost. Checked the switch port, VM machine( base server) Gigabyte 
>ethernet port & VM's ethernet properties( through show network eth0). All are 
>showing full duplex. 
>
>I am running windows 2003 enterprise as base operation system with dual core 
>CPU and 6 gig of ram. All three VM machines( pub/sub.unity connection) are 
>configured for 1.5g memory. CPU utilisation goes upto 71% for a moment while 
>doing the testing. 
>
>The first question is how to resolve this duplex mismatch issue.
>The second one is that for another two VM machines( IPCC & Presence) will this 
>hardware/software combination be good enough or not. If not what are my best 
>options. Should I go for UBUNTU as base operating system. will this help.
>
>Or I am completely on wrong track.
>
>I was able to run ver4.1 PUB with IPCC,SUB and unity on the same server 
>without any issues earlier. 
>
>vineet
>
>
>

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Add Domain on MGCP Gateway V3

[Duy Nguyen]

Did some1 ring?

On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 2:36 PM, Larry Hadrava  wrote:
> Ken:
> No idiots here - just people going through a learning process. Lets just say
> I noticed the issue quickly because maybe I spent some time trying to figure
> this out one night at a customer site:-)
>
> Larry Hadrava
> CCIE #12203 CCNP CCNA
> Sr. Support Engineer – IPexpert, Inc.
> URL: http://www.IPexpert.com
>
>
> On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 3:32 PM, Ken Kov  wrote:
>>
>> That worked.  Sorry I'm an idiot :-)
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> --- On Fri, 5/8/09, Larry Hadrava  wrote:
>>
>> From: Larry Hadrava 
>> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Add Domain on MGCP Gateway V3
>> To: "Ken Kov" 
>> Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
>> Date: Friday, May 8, 2009, 3:14 PM
>>
>> Ken:
>> The @ is not correct. Enter in hostname.domain format.
>> Larry Hadrava
>> CCIE #12203 CCNP CCNA
>> Sr. Support Engineer – IPexpert, Inc.
>> URL: http://www.IPexpert.com
>>
>>
>> On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 3:07 PM, Ken Kov  wrote:
>>>
>>> My original registered info is:
>>> - UCM Gateway = hq2821, which is hostname of router
>>> - UCM Endpoint-Name = S0/SU0/ds...@hq2821
>>> - sh mgcp endpoints on router = S0/SU0/ds...@hq2821
>>> - Therefore all is well
>>>
>>> I then:
>>> - Add "ip domain-name lab.com" in router
>>> - Change UCM Gateway = hq2...@lab.com
>>> - UCM Endpoint-Name now = S0/SU0/ds...@hq2821@lab.com
>>> - no mgcp, mgcp in router
>>> - Router "sh mgcp endpoints" still says S0/SU0/ds...@hq2821
>>> - Therefore no registration
>>>
>>> Any ideas on how to add the ip domian-name without having to start over?
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> --- On Fri, 5/8/09, Larry Hadrava  wrote:
>>>
>>> From: Larry Hadrava 
>>> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Add Domain on MGCP Gateway V3
>>> To: "Ken Kov" 
>>> Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
>>> Date: Friday, May 8, 2009, 12:22 PM
>>>
>>> Ken:
>>> Normally, you would change/add domain info on CCM or UCM for the
>>> GW, change the information on the GW, then issue the commands:
>>>
>>> no mgcp
>>> mgcp
>>>
>>> And this did not work for you?
>>> Larry Hadrava
>>> CCIE #12203 CCNP CCNA
>>> Sr. Support Engineer – IPexpert, Inc.
>>> URL: http://www.IPexpert.com
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 11:32 AM, Ken Kov  wrote:

 I want to add a domain suffix through the "ip domain-name" command on an
 MGCP router that is already registered without that command.  I can't seem
 to do that and get it to re-register without having to delete and rebuild
 the gateway.  I've restarted CallManager, reloaded the router, done the no
 mgcp and mgcp commands.

 Does anyone know of a way to do this without having to delete the
 gateway and rebuild with the domain suffix?

 Thanks
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] What type of VMware machine

[Duy Nguyen]

Dell PowerEdge T100  $329.

Load ESXI and you're good to go.  Don't forget to upgrade the memory.

http://configure.us.dell.com/dellstore/config.aspx?acd=10466193-361116-FW7vkwgl&c=us&cid=7421&cs=04&dgc=BF&kc=productdetails~server-poweredge-t100&l=en&lid=197378&oc=bedwa1k&s=bsd&fb=1


PowerEdge T100
Dual Core Intel® Pentium®E2220, 2.4GHz, 1MB Cache, 800MHz FSBedit
Memory
2GB, DDR2, 800MHz, 1x2GB,Dual Ranked DIMMsedit
Operating System
No Operating Systemedit
Operating System Addition
Noneedit
O/S Partition
Noneedit
Hard Drive Controllers
Onboard SATA, 1-2 Drives connected to onboard SATA controller - No RAIDedit
Primary Hard Drive
160GB 7.2K RPM SATA 3Gbps 3.5-in Cabled Hard Driveedit
2nd Hard Drive
160GB 7.2K RPM SATA 3Gbps 3.5-in Cabled Hard Driveedit
CD/DVD Drive
16x DVD Drive, Internaledit
CD/DVD Drive for 2nd Bay
Noneedit
Floppy Drive
No Floppy Drive


On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 11:44 AM, Stephen Greszczyszyn
 wrote:
>
> I've documented my install here:
>
> http://ccie.gresz.ca/
>
> Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600
> 500 GB Western Digital HD
> Antec NSK2480-UK V2 Desktop Media Case
> Asus P5N7A-VM Motherboard
> 8GB Crucial Memory
>
> I haven't done heavy loading yet on the system (haven't got that far in the 
> labs yet).  The motherboard can handle up to 16GB, but I can get everything 
> running in 8Gig - two CUCM nodes, one Unity Connections server, one CUPS 
> server, one IPCCX server, and a couple of minimal Windows XP clients.

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] h323 Call Preserver

[Duy Nguyen]

What commands and services param have you enabled/disabled?

On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 4:57 PM, Onur Tufekci  wrote:

> I been trying the call preserve trick everytime I set up H323 gateway. Out
> of 10 I got it to work only once. Is there any trick to this?

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCO access

[Duy Nguyen]

Wouldn't a CCIE registered to a CCO account be able to access IOS for
testing?

On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 11:34 AM, Devin Chamberlain <
dchamberl...@unislumin.com> wrote:

>  To get IOS upgrades you need to have a device with smartnet that would
> require IOS.  So I am fairly sure you would need to put the router under
> smartnet.
>
>
>
> *Devin Chamberlain*
> *(403) 560-8599*
>
>
>
> *From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:
> ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *On Behalf Of *Matthew Loraditch
> *Sent:* Wednesday, May 06, 2009 9:44 AM
> *To:* Mark Holloway; 'Larry Hadrava'
>
> *Cc:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCO access
>
>
>
> I would try a phone it should work and if it doesn’t it’s $8 bucks at the
> most lost
>
>
>
>
>
> *Matthew Loraditch*
> 1965 Greenspring Drive
>
> Timonium, MD 21093
> supp...@heliontechnologies.com
> (p) (410) 252-8830
> (F) (443) 541-1593
>
> Visit us at www.heliontechnologies.com
> Support Issue? Email supp...@heliontechnologies.com for fast assistance!
>
>
>
> *From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:
> ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *On Behalf Of *Mark Holloway
> *Sent:* Wednesday, May 06, 2009 11:36 AM
> *To:* 'Larry Hadrava'
> *Cc:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCO access
>
>
>
> Larry,
>
>
>
> I was referring to the IOS and phone firmware downloads on CCO.  With a
> valid SmartNet contract I am able to access the appropriate files, but the
> contract expired.  I want to purchase SmartNet for one of my own pieces of
> equipment so I can have access to the downloads again, I'm just trying to
> figure out what the cheapest piece of gear is that will allow me to do
> this.  I'm not sure if SmartNet on an IP Phone will provide access.
> SmartNet on a 2811 will certainly allow it, but it's more expensive.
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Larry Hadrava [mailto:lhadr...@ipexpert.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, May 05, 2009 3:23 PM
> *To:* Mark Holloway
> *Cc:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCO access
>
>
>
> Mark:
>
> CCO access is FREE. To get to open a TAC case you would need some service
> contract and some areas of the site are for partners only, but most of the
> doc's you need are for public use.
>
>
>
> What is it that you think you will need that you will not have if the
> companies contracts expire?
>
>
> Larry Hadrava
> CCIE #12203 CCNP CCNA
> Sr. Support Engineer – IPexpert, Inc.
> URL: http://www.IPexpert.com 
>
> On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 6:10 PM, Mark Holloway  wrote:
>
> My company's CCO has expired and I'm not sure how long before they renew.
> I was thinking to get my own SmartNet contract so I can gain access to CCO
> again.  I don't want to dump a bunch of money into SmartNet, but I do have
> some Cisco IP phones and 2811 routers at home.  If I put one IP phone on
> SmartNet will I get access to CCO?  Or does it need to be one of the
> routers?  Cheaper is better of course.
>
>
>

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] [cisco-voip] Cisco Version 7 NFR kit from Cisco

[Duy Nguyen]

You have to be associated to a company with Partner status in order to get
NFR kits.

On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 9:46 AM, Robert Kochis  wrote:

> I just tried to order it following Jonathan's instructions and get "No
> products available".  Could it be related to my certification and employer
> status?  I am a CCNA and not associated with any employer at the moment.
>
> I can see a number of products related to network management, etc  NO
> comm mgr though.
>
> Johnathan, Thank you very much for the 'heads up' regarding the product in
> the first place.  I would definitely spend the money for this, I am studying
> for CCVP.
> Thank you, Bob
>
>
>
> On Mon, 2009-05-04 at 12:40 -0500, Jonathan Charles wrote:
>
>
> Follow LInk, click on Cisco Marketplace (top left), then NFR link in
> middle...  login, click on CUCM 7 NFR kit...
>
>
>
> On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 5:12 AM, kamal yousaf  wrote:
> > It seems Cisco has taken the product off-the-shelf.!!!
> >
> > On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 11:15 AM, Jonathan Charles  wrote:
> >>
> >> Follow LInk, click on Cisco Marketplace (top left), then NFR link in
> >> middle...  login, click on CUCM 7 NFR kit...
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Jonathan
> >>
> >> On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 5:29 AM, kamal yousaf 
> >> wrote:
> >> > Hi Jonathan,
> >> >
> >> >  The below link doesn't seem to work for me.It throws some "error in
> >> > processing" screen.Can you pls confirm?
> >> >
> >> > Thanks.
> >> >
> >> > On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 12:08 AM, Jonathan Charles 
> >> > wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> Just wanted everyone to know about the NFR kit for CUCM 7
> >> >>
> >> >> You can order an NFR kit from Cisco that has everything... (except
> >> >> Unity
> >> >> apparently)...
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> https://cisco.mediuscorp.com/market/networkers/productView.se.work?/nxt/rcrs/proieidentity/=17367
>
> >> >>
> >> >> It is $275 and has the following...
> >> >>
> >> >> Cisco Unified Communications Manager 7.0 (including Business Edition)
> >> >> Cisco Unified Presence 7.0
> >> >> Cisco Unified Mobile Advantage 7.0
> >> >> Cisco Unity Connection 7.0
> >> >> Cisco MeetingPlace Express 7.0
> >> >> Cisco Unified Mobile Communicator 7.0
> >> >> Cisco Unified Personal Communicator 7.0
> >> >> Cisco IP Communicator 2.2
> >> >> Cisco Unified Communication Widget 7.0
> >> >> Cisco Unified Application Environment 2.5
> >> >> Cisco Voice Portal 7.0
> >> >> Cisco Unified Contact Center Express 7.0
> >> >> Cisco Unified Provisioning Manager 1.3
> >> >> Cisco Unified Operations Manager 2.1
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> Jonathan
> >> >
> >> >
> >
> >
> ___
> cisco-voip mailing listcisco-v...@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
> ___
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-v...@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Why simple callerID blocking for particular number is not working?

[Duy Nguyen]

Is using external mask checked under calling information?

On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 7:04 PM, jeremy co  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I want to restrict caller iD for particular pattern.
>
> Default on RL-RG
> Restrict on RP (both Calling Line ID Presentation  and  Calling Name
> Presentation )
>
>
> just name will be restricted on pstn phone and I still see phone's number
> on pstn phone.  What am I missing here?
>
> CCM 4.1.3 SR8a
>
> Jeremy
>

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 3rd day in the raw , any body know how "none" location interact with specific location ?

[Duy Nguyen]

HAHA!  Maybe I'll invent the hopago with 1 leg.  I'll make sure to patent it
to collect all that royalties.

On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 3:28 PM, Larry Hadrava  wrote:

> It might be a bit tough to tango with one leg - you could probably either
> tan or go but not both at the same time:-)
>
> Larry Hadrava
> CCIE #12203 CCNP CCNA
> Sr. Support Engineer – IPexpert, Inc.
> URL: http://www.IPexpert.com <http://www.ipexpert.com/>
>
>
>   On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 4:14 PM, Duy Nguyen  wrote:
>
>> If I only have 1 leg, will I still be able to Tango?  Oh you meant 2 as a
>> couple. :)
>>
>> On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 10:28 AM, Vik Malhi  wrote:
>>
>>> For every call that is made in CCM, a location deduction is made for both
>>> the source and destination location.
>>>
>>> AS far as I have understood- the phone is in the HQ location which has
>>> 48Kbps of audio bandwidth and the gateway is in the  location which is
>>> unlimited.
>>>
>>> If both the phone and gateway are within the same region and using g711
>>> this call will fail  since HQ <->  is restricted to 48kbps (the amount
>>> of bandwidth into and out of the HQ location is limited to 48k).
>>>
>>> Yes the  is unlimited but it takes two to tango and the HQ loc is
>>> too low. You should use EITHER HQ or  for the hub location and this
>>> should always be set to unlimited for hub and spoke topologies.
>>> --
>>> Vik Malhi – CCIE #13890, CCSI #31584
>>> Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.
>>>
>>> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
>>> Fax: +1.810.454.0130
>>> Mailto: *vma...@ipexpert.com
>>>
>>> *
>>> Join our free online support and peer group communities:
>>> *http://www.IPexpert.com/communities<http://www.ipexpert.com/communities>
>>> *IPexpert - The Global Leader in Self-Study, Classroom-Based,
>>> Video-On-Demand and Audio Certification Training Tools for the Cisco CCIE
>>> R&S Lab, CCIE Security Lab, CCIE Service Provider Lab , CCIE Voice Lab and
>>> CCIE Storage Lab Certifications.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From: *jeremy co 
>>> *Date: *Mon, 4 May 2009 06:13:07 +1000
>>> *To: *Cliff McGlamry , anil batra >> >
>>> *Cc: *OSL Group 
>>> *Subject: *Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 3rd day in the raw , any body know how
>>> "none" location interact with specific location ?
>>>
>>> reason why I did this setup is understanding CCM behavior on locations.
>>>
>>
>>
>

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 3rd day in the raw , any body know how "none" location interact with specific location ?

[Duy Nguyen]

If I only have 1 leg, will I still be able to Tango?  Oh you meant 2 as a
couple. :)

On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 10:28 AM, Vik Malhi  wrote:

> For every call that is made in CCM, a location deduction is made for both
> the source and destination location.
>
> AS far as I have understood- the phone is in the HQ location which has
> 48Kbps of audio bandwidth and the gateway is in the  location which is
> unlimited.
>
> If both the phone and gateway are within the same region and using g711
> this call will fail  since HQ <->  is restricted to 48kbps (the amount
> of bandwidth into and out of the HQ location is limited to 48k).
>
> Yes the  is unlimited but it takes two to tango and the HQ loc is too
> low. You should use EITHER HQ or  for the hub location and this should
> always be set to unlimited for hub and spoke topologies.
> --
> Vik Malhi – CCIE #13890, CCSI #31584
> Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.
>
> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
> Fax: +1.810.454.0130
> Mailto: *vma...@ipexpert.com
>
> *
> Join our free online support and peer group communities:
> *http://www.IPexpert.com/communities 
> *IPexpert - The Global Leader in Self-Study, Classroom-Based,
> Video-On-Demand and Audio Certification Training Tools for the Cisco CCIE
> R&S Lab, CCIE Security Lab, CCIE Service Provider Lab , CCIE Voice Lab and
> CCIE Storage Lab Certifications.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *jeremy co 
> *Date: *Mon, 4 May 2009 06:13:07 +1000
> *To: *Cliff McGlamry , anil batra 
> *Cc: *OSL Group 
> *Subject: *Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 3rd day in the raw , any body know how
> "none" location interact with specific location ?
>
> reason why I did this setup is understanding CCM behavior on locations.
>

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] how "none" location deal with say "HQ" location?

[Duy Nguyen]

Your call is failing because HQ phone to GW is G711 which requires 80Kbps
yet your location on the phone is only 48kbps.

On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 11:02 AM, jeremy co  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Is set up a simple scenario for call from HQ to 911 on pstn.
>
> HQ region : G711 within
> HQ Phone Location:48kbps
> HQ GW Location: none
>
> call will fail. What I thought is when just one location, it should treat
> none as unlimit. but it's not a case.
>
> CCM traces shows it deal with "none" as 80Kbps, can any one explain this
> behavior?
>
>
> Jeremy
>

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] is there a phone remote control to test moh ios multicast br1 via vracks?

[Duy Nguyen]

Web into phone doesn't show mcast traffic.

On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 7:01 PM,  wrote:

> i think you can just web into the phone ip, see if there is mcat traffic?
>
>
>
> *zamuel del Toro * wrote:
>
>
> Some bady know if exist a phone remote control to test moh ios on br2. I
> need that the phone be behind br1 router.?
> I probe with  voip integration phone remote control but not work on vrack.
> on my own work fine
>
> thanks
>
>  --
> Windows Live Hotmail now works up to 70% faster. Sign up 
> today.
>
>  --
> Power up the Internet with Yahoo! 
> Toolbar.
>

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MRG - MTP

[Duy Nguyen]

Yes.  Trancoders can do both.

On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 7:00 AM, GPSri Ram wrote:

>  Hi All,
>  In MRG
> "When MTPs are required and transcoders exist in the same group, the MTPs
> are always allocated until all MTPs are used, and then transcoders are used
> as MTPs"
>
> If none of the MTP resources available in the group , in that time will
> transcoders are used as MTPs"
>  Regards,
> GPS
>
>
>

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] H323 SRST - Unity gets OriginalCalledParty # prefixed with " " when fwding to Unity on noan for PSTN calls

[Duy Nguyen]

Try it using the TP work around.  Search OSL for it.

On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 12:23 AM, Prabahar M  wrote:

> Hi Juan,
>  I have already configured whatever you are suggesting. But still I am
> getting the extra character in Unity. One of my friend was also faced
> this issue and he fixed it like "to make it reach correct voicemail
> box, I had to CHECK RDNIS for inbound calls on the gateway. This is
> exactly, opposite to what i had to do to make it work in SRST". But
> his solution didn't work for me. I am planning to get it work with
> translation pattern and post the results here.
>
> Regards,
> Prabahar
>
> > Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 22:39:07 -0600
> > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 38,  Issue 71
> -
> >SRST VM Redirect
> >
> >
> > Hello Prabahar,
> >
> >
> >
> > Basically, this fix is to correct that 0xFF issue when redirecting. As
> you see the call will go out using that *3001 at the end, so you what you
> need to do is configure on the gateway the "Significant Digits" to 4, so the
> call is routed to the 6608 T1 and then it lefts over the 3001 as the called
> number, it will try to ring that number but like it is unregistered, it
> sends it to the VM associated. Verify that 3001 has Call forward busy and
> no/an to VM. Check this settings, I have make it work already with that.
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> >
> >
> > Juan
> >
> >> From: ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com
> >> Subject: CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 38, Issue 71
> >> To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> >> Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 00:57:36 -0400
> >>
> >> Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to
> >> ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> >>
> >> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> >> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice
> >> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> >> ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com
> >>
> >> You can reach the person managing the list at
> >> ccie_voice-ow...@onlinestudylist.com
> >>
> >> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> >> than "Re: Contents of CCIE_Voice digest..."
> >>
> >>
> >> Today's Topics:
> >>
> >> 1. Re: H323 SRST - Unity gets OriginalCalledParty # prefixed
> >> with "" when fwding to Unity on noan for PSTN calls (Prabahar M)
> >> 2. Re: H323 SRST - Unity gets OriginalCalledParty #prefixed with
> >> "" when fwding to Unity on noan for PSTN calls
> >> (Linda Mordosky (lmordosk))
> >> 3. Re: NM/AIM_CUE Lab's Default Configuration (Michael Ciarfello)
> >> 4. V3 Lab CUPS (Chris Parker)
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >>
> >> Message: 1
> >> Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 17:26:36 -0700
> >> From: Prabahar M 
> >> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] H323 SRST - Unity gets
> >> OriginalCalledParty # prefixed with "" when fwding to Unity on noan
> >> for PSTN calls
> >> To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> >> Message-ID:
> >> <8e48036b0904101726t74b4b5b9p7fd9fc8dd557e...@mail.gmail.com>
> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
> >>
> >> A call from PSTN coming to a phone (3002) registered in SRST GW.
> >> Phone is not answering the call and forwarded to VM due to "noan"
> >> configured. Since there is problem in redirect cause code, I am
> >> sending the call to CCM using vm-integration config. There it is
> >> forwarded to Unity. Since the original called number is prefixed with
> >> a special charactor, the call is not going to the correct mail box
> >> (3002). It is going to the opening greeting.
> >>
> >> Take a look at the unity trace in the bottom. Any idea why the extra
> >> character is prefixed and to fix the problem?
> >>
> >> Thanks.
>

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Interesting question

[Duy Nguyen]

Determine what you need for call processing of 11000 phones.

On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 1:23 PM, Darren T. Manners wrote:

>
>
> I have question to pose. We have 23 colleges. Each college tends to run its
> own call manager. Our systems office was asking me what drawbacks are there
> to having a single call manager and subscriber at the systems office and
> everyone else feeding off of this? Each site will have srst….but what about
> functionality , presence, video, responder etc etc…Latency is about 20ms..
>
>
>
> Im trying to find out if there is any reason NOT to…so from my perspective
> im looking for problems to not go to that solution. Each site has about
> 400-600 phones. Any help is appreciated.
>
>
>
> Darren
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *Information Security Officer
> Mountain Empire Community College
> **CCIE (SEC) # 18929, CISSP (#85782), CCSP, GIAC GCIA **(#0849) GCIH
> (#1348) GCWN (#0467) CCVP, MCSE, ASE HP, CCA***
>
>  **
>
> *Tel: 276 523 2400 ext 226 *
>
>
> *Email: **dmann...@me.vccs.edu** **
> **www.mecc.edu** *
>
>
>
> *7/4/2009
> Darren T. Manners
> dmann...@me.vccs.edu
> http://www.mecc.edu*
>
> *CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments,
> is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain
> confidential and privileged information or otherwise be protected by law.
> Any access, use, disclosure or distribution of this email message by anyone
> other than the intended recipient(s) is unauthorized and prohibited. If you
> are not an intended recipient (or an agent acting on an intended recipients
> behalf), please contact the sender by reply e-mail and immediately destroy
> all copies of the original message.  Virus scanning is recommended on all
> email attachments. *
>
> **
>
>
>
>

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCM 4.1 SQL change users for new server

[Duy Nguyen]

I don't think that will work.

On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 12:03 AM, CCIE OSL  wrote:

>  Yep!
>
> Not too fun,,
>
>
>
>
> Duy Nguyen wrote:
>
> Are you trying to make a subscriber from the publisher vm?
>
> On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 11:36 PM, CCIE OSL  wrote:
>
>>
>> I run into little minor problem today.
>> I am using VM for my home lab, I just copied one VM to another PC and now
>> I am trying assign it as second CCM.
>> I change IP and the Name of server.
>> Well, now the SQL server is complaining.
>> It looks like I have change all the database users from old server
>> SUB/ccmCDR, ccmservice,  for all..
>>
>> Is there a easier way to do this?
>> Can I just use "sa" for everything?
>>
>> /Jin Jung...
>>
>
>
>

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCM 4.1 SQL change users for new server

[Duy Nguyen]

Are you trying to make a subscriber from the publisher vm?

On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 11:36 PM, CCIE OSL  wrote:

>
> I run into little minor problem today.
> I am using VM for my home lab, I just copied one VM to another PC and now I
> am trying assign it as second CCM.
> I change IP and the Name of server.
> Well, now the SQL server is complaining.
> It looks like I have change all the database users from old server
> SUB/ccmCDR, ccmservice,  for all..
>
> Is there a easier way to do this?
> Can I just use "sa" for everything?
>
> /Jin Jung...
>

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] call from PSTN to Br-2

[Duy Nguyen]

Cliff is saying maybe the phone is in a partition where the trunk has a CSS
where it wouldn't ever reach the phone.  The best is to leave everything
without partitions and then start hardening from that point.

On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 10:37 PM, Erwan Erwan  wrote:

> hi cliff
>
>
> CCM is 4 digit,   the debug dialpeer is showing correct , hit incoming and
> goint to dial-peer 3000, which go to CCM (and CCM will take 4 digit)
>
>
> ok i will using the incoming Transaltion pattern as u suggest in my next
> session, tks for help
>
> erwan
>
>
>
>
>
> --- On *Mon, 4/6/09, Cliff McGlamry * wrote:
>
> From: Cliff McGlamry 
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] call from PSTN to Br-2
> To: e_er...@yahoo.com, ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> Date: Monday, April 6, 2009, 11:27 AM
>
>
>  Actually, you're missing some stuff here.  You're not showing the
> voice-port, but let me take a swing at this just on paper.  I'm a bit
> puzzled by this setup as the international location is normally the CME in
> the stuff I've seen, but we'll go with it being part of HQ or BR1:
>
>
> int loopback 0
> h323-gateway voip interface
> h323-gateway voip bind srcaddress 172.X.X.X   <-- Bind this to whatever you
> define for H323 gateway...usually the loopback
> !
> voice translation-rule 1
> rule 1 /2131\(3...\)/ /\1/
> !
> voice translation-profile 8to4
> transate called 1
> !
> voice-port 1/0:15
> translation-profile incoming 8to4
> !
> dial-peer voice 1 pots
>  incoming called-number .
>  direct-inward-dial
>  port 1/0:15
> !
> dial-peer voice 3000 voip
>  destination-pattern 21313...
>  voice-class codec 1   <---   Not sure what you have defined here, so I'm
> not sure if this is right
>  session target ipv4:177.1.10.10   --> CCm
> no vad
> dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric   <--You missed this one.  Will cause problems
> if you forget
> ip qos dscp cs3 signal  <-- for QOS
>
>
> Hope this helps.  If all else fails, do a DEBUG VOICE DIALPEER ALL and see
> what's happening when it hits.  It's failing on the dial peer, and in the
> case of what you had, it's likely because the extension is defined as 4
> digits and not 8.  You might have the gateway definition in CCM defined to
> send all digits instead of just 4 (in which case, you could just change it
> to 4 digits and fix the issue).  If you have the wrong CSS over there, it
> will also blow up on you.
>
> Cliff
>
>
>
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
>
> *From:* Erwan Erwan 
> *To:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com ; Cliff McGlamry 
> *Sent:* Sunday, April 05, 2009 11:10 PM
> *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] call from PSTN to Br-2
>
>   hi Cliff and Day,
>
> right, ext 3001 in CCM, the debug that I sent before, showing call hit
> the BR-2 and correct dial-peer in BR-2  (dial-peer 1 and 3000)
>
> here is my config   BR-2
> ---
> voice translation-rule 20
>  rule 1 /^3.../ /44232141\0/
> !
> !
> voice translation-profile Outbound-ANI
>  translate calling 20
> !
> !
> controller E1 1/0
>  pri-group timeslots 1-3,16
> !
> dial-peer voice 1 pots
>  incoming called-number .
>  direct-inward-dial
>  port 1/0:15
> !
> dial-peer voice 3000 voip
>  destination-pattern 21313...
>  voice-class codec 1
>  session target ipv4:177.1.10.10   --> CCm
>  no vad
> !
>
> tks
>
>
> --- On *Mon, 4/6/09, Cliff McGlamry * wrote:
>
> From: Cliff McGlamry 
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] call from PSTN to Br-2
> To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> Date: Monday, April 6, 2009, 10:59 AM
>
>  How about posting the dial-peer so we can see it (actually the full
> config would be better).
>
> But in looking at this, I can guess what the problem is.
>
> The number hitting the gateway is 21313001.  I don't have your config, but
> the extension should be 3001.
>
> I personally always have a translation rule that converts the incoming DNIS
> to the proper length.  In this case, I'd have a rule called 8to4 that would
> take that number and return 3001.  I apply this translation to the called
> number and place it on the voice-port (not the dial-peer) in the incoming
> direction.
>
> My bet is that you forgot (1)to build this, (2) the translation rule is off
> (check the the test command), (3) apply it to the port correctly, or
> possibly some combination of the above.
>
> If you post your full config, we can likely tell you exactly where the
> problem is.
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> *From:* Erwan Erwan 
> *To:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> *Sent:* Sunday, April 05, 2009 10:51 PM
> *Subject:* [OSL | CCIE_Voice] call from PSTN to Br-2
>
>   hi,
>
> calling from PSTN  to BR-2 , can not go thru, and "debug isdn q931" saying
> "network-out of order"   , dial-peer is *correct  *
> **
> anybody have idea, what happen ?
>
> 
>  Progress Ind i = 0x8183 - Origination address is non-ISDN
> Calling Party Number i = 0x0180, '911'
> Plan:ISDN, Type:Unknown
> Called Party Number i = 0x81, '21313001'
>  

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] call from PSTN to Br-2

[Duy Nguyen]

So 21313001 is sending to CCM, how is that trunk configured for significant
digits?

On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 10:10 PM, Erwan Erwan  wrote:

> hi Cliff and Day,
>
> right, ext 3001 in CCM, the debug that I sent before, showing call hit
> the BR-2 and correct dial-peer in BR-2  (dial-peer 1 and 3000)
>
> here is my config   BR-2
> ---
> voice translation-rule 20
>  rule 1 /^3.../ /44232141\0/
> !
> !
> voice translation-profile Outbound-ANI
>  translate calling 20
> !
> !
> controller E1 1/0
>  pri-group timeslots 1-3,16
> !
> dial-peer voice 1 pots
>  incoming called-number .
>  direct-inward-dial
>  port 1/0:15
> !
> dial-peer voice 3000 voip
>  destination-pattern 21313...
>  voice-class codec 1
>  session target ipv4:177.1.10.10   --> CCm
>  no vad
> !
>
> tks
>
>
> --- On *Mon, 4/6/09, Cliff McGlamry * wrote:
>
> From: Cliff McGlamry 
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] call from PSTN to Br-2
> To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> Date: Monday, April 6, 2009, 10:59 AM
>
>
>  How about posting the dial-peer so we can see it (actually the full
> config would be better).
>
> But in looking at this, I can guess what the problem is.
>
> The number hitting the gateway is 21313001.  I don't have your config, but
> the extension should be 3001.
>
> I personally always have a translation rule that converts the incoming DNIS
> to the proper length.  In this case, I'd have a rule called 8to4 that would
> take that number and return 3001.  I apply this translation to the called
> number and place it on the voice-port (not the dial-peer) in the incoming
> direction.
>
> My bet is that you forgot (1)to build this, (2) the translation rule is off
> (check the the test command), (3) apply it to the port correctly, or
> possibly some combination of the above.
>
> If you post your full config, we can likely tell you exactly where the
> problem is.
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> *From:* Erwan Erwan 
> *To:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> *Sent:* Sunday, April 05, 2009 10:51 PM
> *Subject:* [OSL | CCIE_Voice] call from PSTN to Br-2
>
>   hi,
>
> calling from PSTN  to BR-2 , can not go thru, and "debug isdn q931" saying
> "network-out of order"   , dial-peer is *correct  *
> **
> anybody have idea, what happen ?
>
> 
>  Progress Ind i = 0x8183 - Origination address is non-ISDN
> Calling Party Number i = 0x0180, '911'
> Plan:ISDN, Type:Unknown
> Called Party Number i = 0x81, '21313001'
> Plan:ISDN, Type:Unknown
> *Apr  5 19:35:17.367: ISDN Se1/0:15 Q931: TX -> CALL_PROC pd = 8  callref =
> 0x8086
> Channel ID i = 0xA98381
> Exclusive, Channel 1
> BR-2#
> *Apr  5 19:35:17.387: ISDN Se1/0:15 Q931: TX -> DISCONNECT pd = 8  callref
> = 0x8086
> Cause i = 0x80A6 - *Network out of order
> **Apr  5 19:35:17.399: ISDN Se1/0:15 Q931: RX <- RELEASE pd = 8  callref =
> 0x0086
> *Apr  5 19:35:17.399: ISDN Se1/0:15 Q931: TX -> RELEASE_COMP pd = 8
> callref = 0x8086
> 
>
>
>

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] call from PSTN to Br-2

[Duy Nguyen]

Make sure you have DID configured on the inbound dial-peer pots.

On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 9:51 PM, Erwan Erwan  wrote:

> hi,
>
> calling from PSTN  to BR-2 , can not go thru, and "debug isdn q931" saying
> "network-out of order"   , dial-peer is *correct  *
> **
> anybody have idea, what happen ?
>
> 
>  Progress Ind i = 0x8183 - Origination address is non-ISDN
> Calling Party Number i = 0x0180, '911'
> Plan:ISDN, Type:Unknown
> Called Party Number i = 0x81, '21313001'
> Plan:ISDN, Type:Unknown
> *Apr  5 19:35:17.367: ISDN Se1/0:15 Q931: TX -> CALL_PROC pd = 8  callref =
> 0x8086
> Channel ID i = 0xA98381
> Exclusive, Channel 1
> BR-2#
> *Apr  5 19:35:17.387: ISDN Se1/0:15 Q931: TX -> DISCONNECT pd = 8  callref
> = 0x8086
> Cause i = 0x80A6 - *Network out of order
> **Apr  5 19:35:17.399: ISDN Se1/0:15 Q931: RX <- RELEASE pd = 8  callref =
> 0x0086
> *Apr  5 19:35:17.399: ISDN Se1/0:15 Q931: TX -> RELEASE_COMP pd = 8
> callref = 0x8086
> 
>
>

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] IPMA

[Duy Nguyen]

Why would the Sub be primary for IPCC?

On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 12:39 PM, Tech Guy  wrote:

>  Do one use the same logic in IPCC, Unity, H323 Dial-peers; MGCP,
> Gatekeeper, etc? i.e. The Sub shld be the primary and Pub the secondary?
>
> Tech Guy
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> *From:* saralilin2...@yahoo.co.jp
> *To:* marwa  ; OSL CCIE Voice Lab 
> Exam
> *Sent:* Sunday, April 05, 2009 8:27 AM
> *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] IPMA
>
>
> 1. pub
> 2. sub primary, pub sec.
> there is a video by vik on ipexpert check it out
> *marwa * wrote:
>
>  hi list,
>
> i have been configuring ipma with proxy line, i have two questions
> 1-the url should it point to the pub or the sub
> 2- when configuring the service parameters, do i put the sub or the pub as
> the primary server
>
> --
> Power up the Internet with Yahoo! 
> Toolbar.
>
>

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] IPPA Agent state ready auto

[Duy Nguyen]

I believe you can.  Go into Resource group in CRS if I'm not mistaken.

On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 12:51 PM, Onur Tufekci  wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> Is it possible to put the agents in the ready state automatically right
> after one button login?
>
> Thank you in advance,
>
> Onur.
>

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Annoying VMWARE Server kkkKkkk

[Duy Nguyen]

This seems to alleviate the issue, might not be a fix but it works.  I shut
the image down through vmware console.  Boot it back up and now no more
.

On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 9:03 AM, Arshad Dhunna wrote:

>   I said this before only vmware can fix this issue, its an image bug.
>
> Thks
>
> --- On *Fri, 3/4/09, James Key * wrote:
>
>
> From: James Key 
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Annoying VMWARE Server kkkKkkk
> To: "Duy Nguyen" , "OSL Group" <
> CCIE_Voice@onlinestudylist.com>
> Date: Friday, 3 April, 2009, 6:24 PM
>
>  Duy,
>
> I have run into this same issue periodically and have yet to find any info
> on how to correct it.  If you find a fix, please share!
>
>
>
>
>
> James
>
> *From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:
> ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *On Behalf Of *Duy Nguyen
> *Sent:* Friday, April 03, 2009 1:15 AM
> *To:* OSL Group
> *Subject:* [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Annoying VMWARE Server kkkKkkk
>
>
>
> How do you fix this annoying issue when after I reverted the snapshot the
> vmware images of Pub and Sub, something keeps typing k.  I have already
> rebooted but to no effect.  I'm using VMware Server 2.0.  I also notice this
> on Proctorlabs as well.  My Unity image is fine after snapshot revert.
>
> NOTICE: This electronic mail message and any files transmitted with it are 
> intended
> exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed. The 
> message,
> together with any attachment, may contain confidential and/or privileged 
> information.
> Any unauthorized review, use, printing, saving, copying, disclosure or 
> distribution
> is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please
> immediately advise the sender by reply email and delete all copies.
>
>
> --
> Get perfect Email ID for your Resume. Get before others 
> grab.<http://in.rd..yahoo.com/tagline_dbid_5/*http://in.promos.yahoo.com/address>

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Annoying VMWARE Server kkkKkkk

[Duy Nguyen]

How do you fix this annoying issue when after I reverted the snapshot the
vmware images of Pub and Sub, something keeps typing k.  I have already
rebooted but to no effect.  I'm using VMware Server 2.0.  I also notice this
on Proctorlabs as well.  My Unity image is fine after snapshot revert.

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Annunciator for block internal calls

[Duy Nguyen]

Cliff,

James is correct.  You can block with translation patterns.

On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 7:09 PM, Cliff McGlamry  wrote:

>  James,
>
> Yes.  WIth a translation pattern there is no option to "block this call".
> Route patterns allow you to block, and you can also provide a block code
> which will fire the annunciator under certain circumstances.
>
> Cliff
>
>
> - Original Message -
> *From:* James Key 
> *To:* Cliff McGlamry  ; Jiahong - tobeccie 
> Fang;
> ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> *Sent:* Wednesday, April 01, 2009 7:16 PM
> *Subject:* RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Annunciator for block internal calls
>
> I think Cliff  meant to say use a  Translation Pattern as a block pattern,
> and CTI Route Point not suitable because you can't block with it.  Correct
> me if I am wrong Cliff ;-)
>
> I just tested this and it worked great.  As far as what patterns you should
> use (9.011!, 9.011!#) I would say it would depend on your specific
> requirments in the lab.
>
> James Key
>  --
> *From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [
> ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Cliff McGlamry [
> cl...@mcglamry.net]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, April 01, 2009 4:55 PM
> *To:* Jiahong - tobeccie Fang; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Annunciator for block internal calls
>
>  Just put it in a route list as a block pattern and pick the cause code
> that says they don't have the required precedence level.  It's built in.  No
> need to send to Unity.
>
> Translation pattern is probably not suitable since you can't do blocking
> with it.  Only send it somewhere else.
>
> You put the patterns you want into a partition and put it either in a
> separate call search space and apply to the line (so they get hit first) on
> lines that are to be blocked, or put it in at the TOP of the CSS for the
> phones that will have it (if you want to use a single CSS).
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> *From:* Jiahong - tobeccie Fang 
> *To:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> *Sent:* Wednesday, April 01, 2009 5:21 PM
> *Subject:* [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Annunciator for block internal calls
>
> Requirement in annunciator: HQ phone1 x2001 can call international 9011,
> other HQ phones should hear msg that they don't have required precedence
> level to make the call.
>
> My solution:
> I will put these block patterns in 'pt-internal', then
>  manipulate called number to one CTI RP say x2444, then cfwall to Unity
> to play msg.
>
> My concerns:
> for these block pattern, Translation-Pattern seems be suitable
> than RP. Because inside RP you have to assign RL which will override RP
> called number settings.
> For TP, what pattern should I give it - both 9011!, 9011!# or just 9011
>
> Don't have lab to test it out.
>
> Any one have ideas?
>
> --
> Invite your mail contacts to join your friends list with Windows Live
> Spaces. It's easy! Try 
> it!
>
> NOTICE: This electronic mail message and any files transmitted with it are 
> intended
> exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed. The 
> message,
> together with any attachment, may contain confidential and/or privileged 
> information.
> Any unauthorized review, use, printing, saving, copying, disclosure or 
> distribution
> is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please
> immediately advise the sender by reply email and delete all copies.
>
>

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] dspfarm profile conference ?

[Duy Nguyen]

Erwan,

Looks like I emailed Anil only instead of the whole group yesterday.


fromDuy Nguyen 
toanil batra 
dateMon, Mar 30, 2009 at 8:05 PM
subjectRe: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] dspfarm profile conference ?
mailed-bygmail.com
hide details Mar 30 (1 day ago) Reply

Try this,
Remove the the PRI's configuration, set the transcoding up then setup the
PRI afterwards.

On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 1:40 PM, Erwan Erwan  wrote:

>   hi Anil,
>
> they have 16 DSP  , use for 3 channel T1  only ( I shut down the other T1)
>
> --
> FLEX VOICE CARD 0
> --
>*DSP VOICE CHANNELS*
> DSP   DSP DSPWARE CURR  BOOT PAK
> TX/RX
> TYPE  NUM CH CODECVERSION STATE STATE   RST AI VOICEPORT TS ABRT PACK
> COUNT
> = === ==  === = === === == = == 
> 
> C5510 001 01 None  4.4.15 idle  idle  0  0
> 0  0/0
> C5510 001 02 None  4.4.15 idle  idle  0  0
> 0  0/0
> C5510 001 03 None  4.4.15 idle  idle  0  0
> 0  0/0
> C5510 001 04 None  4.4.15 idle  idle  0  0
> 0  0/0
> C5510 001 05 None  4.4.15 idle  idle  0  0
> 0  0/0
> C5510 001 06 None  4.4.15 idle  idle  0  0
> 0  0/0
> C5510 001 07 None  4.4.15 idle  idle  0  0
> 0  0/0
> C5510 001 08 None  4.4.15 idle  idle  0  0
> 0  0/0
> C5510 001 09 None  4.4.15 idle  idle  0  0
> 0  0/0
> C5510 001 10 None  4.4.15 idle  idle  0  0
> 0  0/0
> C5510 001 11 None  4.4.15 idle  idle  0  0
> 0  0/0
> C5510 001 12 None  4.4.15 idle  idle  0  0
> 0  0/0
> C5510 001 13 None  4.4.15 idle  idle  0  0
> 0  0/0
> C5510 001 14 None  4.4.15 idle  idle  0  0
> 0  0/0
> C5510 001 15 None  4.4.15 idle  idle  0  0
> 0  0/0
> C5510 001 16 None  4.4.15 idle  idle  0  0
> 0  0/0
> END OF FLEX VOICE CARD 0
> 
>
>
> tks
>
> --- On *Tue, 3/31/09, anil batra * wrote:
>
> From: anil batra 
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] dspfarm profile conference ?
> To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com, e_er...@yahoo.com
> Date: Tuesday, March 31, 2009, 5:51 AM
>
>
>   How many DSP u hv , how many T1/E1 you are using .seems like you are
> running short of DSP's
>
> --- On *Tue, 3/31/09, Erwan Erwan * wrote:
>
>
> From: Erwan Erwan 
> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] dspfarm profile conference ?
> To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> Date: Tuesday, March 31, 2009, 3:16 AM
>
>hi,
>
> I config the dspfarm for conference in 2811
> --
>
> voice-card 0
>dsp service dspfarm
>
> dspfarm profile 1 conference
>codec g711ulaw
>codec g711alaw
>no codec g729abr8
>no codec g729br8
>no codec gsmfr
>max session 2
>associate application SCCP
>no shut
> --
> I have not config any transcoding yet
> but the " max session" only 0 , mean do not work
>
> any idea/workaround ?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCM 7 on VMWare

[Duy Nguyen]

Why don't you try it yourself if you already have the hardware.  Do a search
and you should get a lot of hits that AMD isn't supported.

On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 11:44 AM, kapil atrish  wrote:

>   Hi list,
>
> I want to know if CCM 7 is supported on VMWare workstation 5.0? The
> hardware I've is AMD quad-core, 4gig ram. Will that work, if someone who has
> tested it can comment please?
>
> Thanks..
>
>
>
>
>
>

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] calling to crs

[Duy Nguyen]

On the HQ side.

On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 9:57 AM, ccie Me  wrote:

> Hi
>
> i have a basic question :) if i need to call from cm site to crs pilot
> number via gatekeeper, do i need  to add a transcoder, in case i need this,
> where should i apply this transcoder?
>
> Thx
>
>

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 1760 Router DSP Question,

[Duy Nguyen]

Jin,

Remove the FXS, configure Transcoding for 2 sessions, see if it works then
shutdown and plug the fxs back in.  Always insert the VIC's from right to
left.

On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 10:32 PM, CCIE OSL  wrote:

>
> I have purchased a 1760 router with PVDM-12 and CME.and FXS
> Just so that I can play with it at home.
>  I normally use Proctorslab.
>
> Now I am trying to configure Transcoder,
> But it will not work,
>
> Accouring to the Cisco DOC, 1760 only support PVDM-256k-4,8,12..NOT PVDM2.
> However, when I call from my FXS port to local CME phone it work fine with
> DSP farm showing trancording.
>
> SPMM  DSPRM  State   Image D-sig  D-sig A-sig  A-sig  Mips
> Voice/Xcode
>   Dsp   Dsp  allocate   free  allocate   free  Free
> Chan
>   0/0 0  UP   FIXHC 0  0 2  050
> 1
>   0/1 1  UP   FLEX6 0  6 0  0   100
> 0
>   0/2 2  UP   FLEX6 0  6 0  0   100
> 0
>
> So, Is the PVDM2 working on 1760?? or is not??
>
> In any case, somehow I got it to register sdspfarm for CME, but now my FXZ
> phone stops working.
> I guess I took the DSP resource away from FXS,
> So I change sdspfarm max-session from 4 to 2 and reload the router, Now, mu
> FXS phone works but sdspfarm is no longer registered.
>
> mtp-1 Device:mtp0014a8202e0f TCP socket:[-1]  UNREGISTERED
> actual_stream:0 max_stream 0 IP:0.0.0.0  0  Unknown 0 keepalive 0
>
>  max-mtps:1, max-streams:4, alloc-streams:0, act-streams::0
>
> Can someone help
>
> /Jin Jung..
>
>  Cisco 1751 and Cisco 1760 Routers
>
> Cisco 1751 and Cisco 1760 routers use the following PVDMs:
>
> •PVDM-256K-4 (1 DSP)
>
> •PVDM-256K-8 (2 DSPs)
>
> •PVDM-256K-12 (3 DSPs)
>
> •PVDM-256K-16HD (4 DSPs)
>
> •PVDM-256K-20HD (5 DSPs)
>
>  DSP Farms for NM-HDVs: Example
>
> The following example sets up a DSP farm of 4 DSPs to handle up to 16
> sessions (4 sessions per DSP) on a router with an IP address of 10.5.49.160
> and a priority of 1 among other servers.
>
> voice-card 1
>  dsp services dspfarm
>
>  exit
>
> sccp local FastEthernet 0/0
>
> sccp
>
> sccp ccm 10.5.49.160 priority 1
>
> dspfarm transcoder maximum sessions 16
>
> dspfarm
>
> telephony-service
>
>  ip source-address 10.5.49.200 port 2000
>
>  sdspfarm units 4
>
>  sdspfarm transcode sessions 40
>
>  sdspfarm tag 1 mtp000a8eaca80
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
<>

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] duplex mismatch

[Duy Nguyen]

CDP isn't a duplex issue.  If the port is connecting to a PC, sometimes it's
best to hardcode it to 100Mb Full.

On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 2:43 AM, adefila seun wrote:

> Hello All,
>
> On the fastethernet port connecting to the core switch, i have the duplex
> setting as auto
>
> i have this message popping up on the console the HQ router
>
>
>
> CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH: duplex mismatch discovered on fastethernet0/1 (not
> full duplex), with SW1 ..
>
> i issue no cdp run
>
> it stopped
>
> i need to confirm if it does not have an underlying effect because after
> all the config i could not access the callmanager
>
> Any information will be appreciated
>
> Thanks
>
>

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] BR1 integration

[Duy Nguyen]

Yes.

On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 2:37 PM, adefila seun wrote:

> Hello,
>
> You are saying that it could be showing registered on the SUB and not
> reflect on the PUB?
>
> Regards
>
> --- On *Sat, 28/3/09, Duy Nguyen * wrote:
>
>
> From: Duy Nguyen 
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] BR1 integration
> To: "Devin Chamberlain" 
> Cc: "adefilabi...@yahoo.co.uk" , "
> ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com" 
> Date: Saturday, 28 March, 2009, 4:42 PM
>
>
> Reset your RIS collector, also verify on CCM admin page of PUB and SUB that
> it shows registered.  Sometimes The Pub doesn't reflect even though the SUB
> shows registered.
>
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 2:36 PM, Devin Chamberlain <
> dchamberl...@unislumin.com<http://uk.mc12.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=dchamberl...@unislumin.com>
> > wrote:
>
>>  I have seen this before with PRI's ... do a debug ccm-manager
>> config-download error (or all) and I believe the error in my case was I had
>> added a domain in the router config but not added it in the Call Manager
>> gateway config.
>>
>> Devin
>>  *
>> *
>> --
>> *From:* 
>> ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com<http://uk.mc12.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com>[
>> ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com<http://uk.mc12.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com>]
>> On Behalf Of adefila seun 
>> [adefilabi...@yahoo.co.uk<http://uk.mc12.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=adefilabi...@yahoo.co.uk>
>> ]
>> *Sent:* March 26, 2009 11:09 AM
>> *To:* 
>> ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com<http://uk.mc12.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=ccie_vo...@onlinestudylist.com>
>> *Subject:* [OSL | CCIE_Voice] BR1 integration
>>
>>  Hello All,
>>
>> I was having a session yesterday with ver 2.0 of the voice proctor lab.
>>
>> After integrating the br1 gateway to the callmanager, the sh ccm-manager
>> shows the gateway is registered to the two callmangers
>>
>> but on the call manager, it was showing unknown
>>
>> Any one with anh idea of what could be the problem?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>>
>
>

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Dial-peer overlapping

[Duy Nguyen]

Chris,

It actually keeps hitting the "Dial-peer voice 2300 voip" because of a
shorter pattern when I dial 2400.  I was able to achieve this by making it
more explicit.

Allow to dial HQ phones
!
dial-peer voice 2300 voip
 preference 1
 destination-pattern [23][0-1]..
 session target ras
 tech-prefix 1
 dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric
 ip qos dscp cs3 signaling
 no vad
!

Allow to go to HQ Phone's VM directly
dial-peer voice 22000 voip
 preference 1
 destination-pattern 22...
 session target ras
 tech-prefix 1
 dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric
 ip qos dscp cs3 signaling
 no vad
!

Allow to hit the CME ph's VM directly.  Also put in 24001 pattern into E.164
in CUE.
ephone-dn 20
number 2400.
preference 0 secondary 9
huntstop
call-forward all 4111
call-waiting beep

On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 10:31 PM, Chris Parker  wrote:

> Duy,
>
> Remember, the digit analyzer in IOS will always match the peer with the
> most matching digits first.
>
> So for the first issue of forwarding to VM. The config you have is exactly
> right. All of the extensions at that site are 4001 - 4003. So when you dial
> 24001, it will always match that ephone first and go where you want tit to
> go.
>
> The same goes with the WAN dial peer (2300). The extension rages at the
> other locations are 2001-4 and 3001-4 respectively. The only time you would
> get into hot water is if you had an extension at HQ that was 2400. Then you
> would have a problem.
>
> For the third requirement the answer is simple make a peer with the
> destination patten of: 2[23]...
>
> Chris
>
>
>
> Duy Nguyen wrote:
>
>> How would I achieve this?
>>
>> User at Site C should press 24XXX, then it will forward to user's voice
>> mailbox greeting.
>>
>> E.g. when user dial 24001, then it will be forwarding directly to 4001 VM
>> and leave a message. This call routing should work over the WAN also.
>>
>> My solution:
>> ephone-dn 20
>> number 24...
>> call-forward all 4111
>>
>> Problem is:
>> dial-peer voice 2300 voip
>> destination-pattern [23]...
>> session target ras
>> tech-prefix 1
>> dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric
>> ip qos dscp cs3 signaling
>> no vad
>> !
>>
>> Another issue, it is also asking for the same on CCM side when user dials
>> 22XXX should go to VM directly and should also work over the WAN. From CME
>> could not dial 22XXX since it keeps hitting Dial-peer voice 2300 voip.
>>
>> If I change the
>> dial-peer voice 2300
>> destination-pattern [23][0128]..
>>
>> Still won't achieve calling to Main site phone's VM.
>>
>
>

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Dial-peer overlapping

[Duy Nguyen]

How would I achieve this?

User at Site C should press 24XXX, then it will forward to user's voice
mailbox greeting.

E.g. when user dial 24001, then it will be forwarding directly to 4001 VM
and leave a message. This call routing should work over the WAN also.

My solution:
ephone-dn 20
number 24...
call-forward all 4111

Problem is:
dial-peer voice 2300 voip
destination-pattern [23]...
session target ras
tech-prefix 1
dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric
ip qos dscp cs3 signaling
no vad
!

Another issue, it is also asking for the same on CCM side when user dials
22XXX should go to VM directly and should also work over the WAN. From CME
could not dial 22XXX since it keeps hitting Dial-peer voice 2300 voip.

If I change the
dial-peer voice 2300
destination-pattern [23][0128]..

Still won't achieve calling to Main site phone's VM.

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CME GK GW Type

[Duy Nguyen]

Are you calling from CCM to CME and forward to CUE?  Voice service voip ties
in 2 VOIP call legs.

On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 1:23 PM, Chris Parker  wrote:

> OK now my question is ... what does the "no voice service voip" do? I can
> still call from my phone to CUE etc. Does it break voip to voip calls, but
> not pots to voip?
>
>
>
> Chris Parker wrote:
>
>> If I issue "no voice service voip" on the CME router than I get:
>>
>> Pod12-HQ-RTR#sh gatekeeper endpoints
>>   GATEKEEPER ENDPOINT REGISTRATION
>>   
>> CallSignalAddr  Port  RASSignalAddr   Port  Zone Name Type
>>  Flags
>> --- - --- - - 
>>  -
>> 172.2.102.1 1720  172.2.102.1 49169 CCM   VOIP-GW
>>   H323-ID: Pod12-BR2-RTR
>>   Voice Capacity Max.=  Avail.=  Current.= 0
>> Total number of active registrations = 1
>>
>> Of course this has other ramifications .
>>
>> Chris
>>
>>
>> Chris Parker wrote:
>>
>>> WellIm wondering if taking no-reg off my dn's is necessary 
>>>
>>> Tried that and I still get:
>>>
>>> Pod12-HQ-RTR#sh gatekeeper endpoints
>>>   GATEKEEPER ENDPOINT REGISTRATION
>>>   
>>> CallSignalAddr  Port  RASSignalAddr   Port  Zone Name Type
>>>  Flags
>>> --- - --- - - 
>>>  -
>>> 172.2.102.1 1720  172.2.102.1 52983 CCM   H323-GW
>>>   H323-ID: Pod12-BR2-RTR
>>>   Voice Capacity Max.=  Avail.=  Current.= 0
>>> Total number of active registrations = 1
>>>
>>>
>>> Heres my config:
>>>
>>> Pod12-BR2-RTR#sh run
>>> Building configuration...
>>>
>>> Current configuration : 7889 bytes
>>> !
>>> ! Last configuration change at 20:15:08 CET Sat Mar 28 2009
>>> !
>>> version 12.4
>>> service timestamps debug datetime msec
>>> service timestamps log datetime msec
>>> no service password-encryption
>>> !
>>> hostname Pod12-BR2-RTR
>>> !
>>> boot-start-marker
>>> boot system flash c2800nm-adventerprisek9_ivs-mz.124-3g.bin
>>> boot-end-marker
>>> !
>>> logging buffered 4096 debugging
>>> !
>>> no aaa new-model
>>> !
>>> resource policy
>>> !
>>> memory-size iomem 20
>>> clock timezone CET 1
>>> network-clock-participate wic 0
>>> ip subnet-zero
>>> !
>>> !
>>> ip cef
>>> no ip dhcp use vrf connected
>>> ip dhcp excluded-address 10.2.202.1 10.2.202.49
>>> ip dhcp excluded-address 10.2.202.70 10.2.202.254
>>> !
>>> ip dhcp pool local
>>>  network 10.2.202.0 255.255.255.0
>>>  option 150 ip 10.2.202.1
>>>  default-router 10.2.202.1
>>> !
>>> !
>>> no ip domain lookup
>>> ip multicast-routing
>>> !
>>> isdn switch-type primary-net5
>>> !
>>> voice-card 0
>>> no dspfarm
>>> dsp services dspfarm
>>> !
>>> !
>>> !
>>> voice service voip
>>> allow-connections h323 to h323
>>> allow-connections h323 to sip
>>> !
>>> !
>>> !
>>> !
>>> !
>>> !
>>> !
>>> !
>>> !
>>> !
>>> voice translation-rule 10
>>> rule 1 /^331322\(3...\)/ /\1/
>>> !
>>> voice translation-rule 20
>>> rule 1 /^3.../ /331322\0/
>>> !
>>> voice translation-rule 30
>>> rule 1 /^1.../ /00121\0/
>>> rule 2 /^2.../ /001617522\0/
>>> !
>>> !
>>> voice translation-profile 4digit
>>> translate called 30
>>> !
>>> voice translation-profile in
>>> translate called 10
>>> !
>>> voice translation-profile out
>>> translate calling 20
>>> !
>>> !
>>> !
>>> !
>>> !
>>> !
>>> controller E1 0/0/0
>>> pri-group timeslots 1-3,16
>>> !
>>> !
>>> !!
>>> !
>>> interface Loopback0
>>> ip address 172.2.102.1 255.255.255.255
>>> ip ospf network point-to-point
>>> h323-gateway voip interface
>>> h323-gateway voip id CCM ipaddr 172.2.100.1 1719
>>> h323-gateway voip h323-id Pod12-BR2-RTR
>>> h323-gateway voip bind srcaddr 172.2.102.1
>>> !
>>> interface FastEthernet0/0
>>> ip address 10.2.102.1 255.255.255.0
>>> duplex auto
>>> speed auto
>>> !
>>> interface FastEthernet0/0.220
>>> encapsulation dot1Q 220
>>> ip address 10.2.202.1 255.255.255.0
>>> no snmp trap link-status
>>> !
>>> interface Service-Engine0/0
>>> ip unnumbered FastEthernet0/0.220
>>> service-module ip address 10.2.202.2 255.255.255.0
>>> service-module ip default-gateway 10.2.202.1
>>> !
>>> interface FastEthernet0/1
>>> no ip address
>>> shutdown
>>> duplex auto
>>> speed auto
>>> !
>>> interface Serial0/0/0:15
>>> no ip address
>>> isdn switch-type primary-net5
>>> isdn incoming-voice voice
>>> isdn bchan-number-order ascending
>>> isdn outgoing display-ie
>>> isdn outgoing ie redirecting-number
>>> no cdp enable
>>> !
>>> interface Serial0/1/0
>>> no ip address
>>> encapsulation frame-relay IETF
>>> frame-relay traffic-shaping
>>> frame-relay lmi-type ansi
>>> !interface Serial0/1/0.1 point-to-point
>>> ip ospf mtu-ignore
>>> frame-relay interface-dlci 102 ppp Virtual-Template1
>>> !
>>> interface Virtual-Template1
>>> ip address 162.2.102.2 255.255.255.0
>>> ip pim dense-mode
>>> ppp multilink
>>> ppp multilink fragment delay 10

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GK no tech-prefix

[Duy Nguyen]

If the exam states to use the SUB as primary and PUB as secondary for
everything, unless noted to not too, then it's a given that you should know
only gw-priority will work.

On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 11:55 AM, Cliff McGlamry  wrote:

> I agree with Jin,
>
> With a single zone and single tech prefix, then you must use zone prefixes
> with gateway priority to sort out the final destination and selection order
> (in the case of the sub/pub).
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "CCIE OSL" 
> To: "Christian Hennrich" 
> Cc: 
> Sent: Saturday, March 28, 2009 12:48 PM
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GK no tech-prefix
>
>
> It's really not clear what you are asking here.
> But, for me, -- This is just for me of course, I am sure other folks may
> have different mathods.
>
> I believe you must use gw-priority command to give each prefix 2*, 1* 7*
> point to SUB first with priority 10 and PUB with priority 9, or anything
> above 5.
>
> And, there are some special cases where, depending on a question, you
> may have to use hop-off.
>
> So you may have to use both,
>
> /Jin Jung...
>
>
> Christian Hennrich wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > if we are only allowed to use 1 zone and 1 tech-prefix, let's say 1#,
> > then we can use hopoff command with fixing the ports in the CCM
> > Service parameter, or we can use gw-priority.
> >
> > With gw-priority I can select, for example sub first and pub second,
> > that is not possible with hopoff.
> >
> > So is there any difference then what I have mentioned, what is your
> > preferred command in this case?
> >
> > Any answer is very much appreciated.
> > Christian
>
>
>
>

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] BR1 integration

[Duy Nguyen]

Reset your RIS collector, also verify on CCM admin page of PUB and SUB that
it shows registered.  Sometimes The Pub doesn't reflect even though the SUB
shows registered.

On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 2:36 PM, Devin Chamberlain <
dchamberl...@unislumin.com> wrote:

>  I have seen this before with PRI's ... do a debug ccm-manager
> config-download error (or all) and I believe the error in my case was I had
> added a domain in the router config but not added it in the Call Manager
> gateway config.
>
> Devin
>  *
>
> *
> --
> *From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [
> ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of adefila seun [
> adefilabi...@yahoo.co.uk]
> *Sent:* March 26, 2009 11:09 AM
> *To:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> *Subject:* [OSL | CCIE_Voice] BR1 integration
>
>  Hello All,
>
> I was having a session yesterday with ver 2.0 of the voice proctor lab.
>
> After integrating the br1 gateway to the callmanager, the sh ccm-manager
> shows the gateway is registered to the two callmangers
>
> but on the call manager, it was showing unknown
>
> Any one with anh idea of what could be the problem?
>
> Thanks
>
>

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Chassis for ESXi

[Duy Nguyen]

Take a look at the link.  It might have already expired but just keep an eye
out on that forums.

http://www.fatwallet.com/forums/hot-deals/907712?highlight_key=y&keyword1=dell+quad

On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 5:12 PM, Mike O  wrote:

>  Cliff,
>
> I'm running ESXi on a Dell 530 w/Q6600, 500GB and 6GB RAM. I can run
> multiple call managers(4.x,5.x,6,x & 7), UCCX, Unity etc. with zero issues.
> The whole setup was less than 600.00
>
> -Mike
>
> - Original Message -
> *From:* Cliff McGlamry 
> *To:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> *Sent:* Sunday, March 22, 2009 5:47 PM
> *Subject:* [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Chassis for ESXi
>
> Looking for recommendations for a good chassis to run ESXi on in a home lab
> that's personally funded.
>
> Any suggestions?
>
>

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] VMware ESXi for CCM servers

[Duy Nguyen]

After install, you can give it limited memory and it will work.  Initial is
when it needs the resources.  Does UCCx 7 runs on Windows or is it Linux.
If it's Linux just choose redhat 4/5.

On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 4:16 PM, Jeff Garvas  wrote:

> I have a P4 3Ghz with 4gb running ESXi.   One thing I've read and
> experienced is that installing just about anything with less than the
> minimum disk/memory is asking for trouble.   In some unique instalaltions
> you'll get it to finish but it won't work right, services won't start right,
> etc.
>
> Has anyone here been successful installing UCCx 7 in ESXi?   If so, what
> platform server OS did you use or does it not matter?   I have the four
> HP/IBM CDs and I have not attempted this yet.
>
> Also, the OS won't install without 2gb of memory.   I tried to install it
> on a IBM box that only had a gig and figured that one out.   Anyone know if
> I can scale back the memory after installing everything or does it need that
> much to operate at all?
>
>
>

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] VMware ESXi for CCM servers

[Duy Nguyen]

Make sure during the initial install that you allocate 74GB of hd and @
least 2GB of ram.

On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 2:35 PM,  wrote:

> Any tricks to getting CUCM 7 working on ESXi ? My install keeps failing .
> I haven't invested too much time yet, as I'm trying hard to pass with the
> current blueprint :)
>
>
>
> On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 1:15 PM, Arun Kumar  wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> I'm running CUCM 7 and Unity Connection 7 on ESXi with 6GB of RAM and
>> 500GB of HDD and it's working fine. Not tested on Linux.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 6:44 PM, WorkerBee  wrote:
>>
>>> Anyone has tried using ESXi with Quad core/8G ram instead of using
>>> VMware server on a Linux?
>>>
>>> Does ESXi gives a better performance?
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>
>>
>

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 2 Dial plan questions

[Duy Nguyen]

Cliff,

When you dial the international number with #, it will conclude that's the
route pattern to take and Call Manager will not send the #.

Question 2, you can used either as long as TEHO works.

On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 12:28 PM, Cliff McGlamry  wrote:

>  Two questions about dial plan.
>
> In the V3 Lab 1 dial plan explanations, the need is discussed for the
> following patterns to support international dialing out of HQ and BR1.
>
> 9.011!
> 9.011!#
>
> If the CCM parameter to strip the # from Called Party Number is set to true
> (the default), why is the second pattern necessary?
>
> Second question:
>
> Incoming call from GK to HQ that is TEHO from BR2.  The incoming string
> would be something like:
>
> 1#12125551212
>
> The explanation discusses using a translation pattern to strip the 1#, but
> it occurs to me that you could just have 1#.12125551212 on a route pattern
> and strip pre dot.   Is there something wrong, more time consuming, or
> something else with this approach?
>
> Cliff
>

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MOH from BR1 Flash in case Primary CCM down

[Duy Nguyen]

Kapil,

Post your config of BR1.

On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 7:40 AM, Kumar, Narinder  wrote:

>  Why do you give the same add to pub and Sub ? Trying giving pub and sub
> different multicast base address
>
>
>
> *From:* Kapil Atrish [mailto:kapilatr...@hotmail.com]
> *Sent:* Thursday, 26 February 2009 12:28 AM
> *To:* Kumar, Narinder; basant.ya...@gmail.com
> *Cc:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
>  *Subject:* RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MOH from BR1 Flash in case Primary CCM
> down
>
>
>
> Yeah but once Sub is offline, the Multicast Address configured at BR1 is
> not active. How do I point it to Pub dynamically.
>
> I tried giving same Address to Pub/Sub and changing Base port 16384 and
> 16386 but haven't worked since BR1 is still configured for Sub Multicast IP
> and port no.
>
> Is there a wayout I can add two multicast entries in BR1?
>  --
>
> From: narinder.ku...@uxcg.com.au
> To: narinder.ku...@uxcg.com.au; kapilatr...@hotmail.com;
> basant.ya...@gmail.com
> CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 00:06:45 +1100
> Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MOH from BR1 Flash in case Primary CCM down
>
> Kapil correction. No need of route filers, You can have PUB Hop count to 1
> in that case 239.1.1.1 will never reach Branch.
>
>
>
> *From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:
> ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *On Behalf Of *Kumar, Narinder
> *Sent:* Thursday, 26 February 2009 12:04 AM
> *To:* Kapil Atrish; basant.ya...@gmail.com
> *Cc:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MOH from BR1 Flash in case Primary CCM
> down
>
>
>
> Kapil,
>
> I haven’t tested this but .
>
> If Sub unicast  to BR1 than you can easily achieve this by spoofing the PUB
> multicast add and have PUB ur second choice for MOH for Branch  and have
> multicast hop of 1, and config  multicast MOH under call-manager-fall
>
>
>
> Assuming you are trying to achieve Multicast MOH end to end.
>
> 2 MOH Pub and Sub, in 2 different MGR both multicast enabled.
>
> Say Sub is ur primary MOH with Base IP add 239.1.2.1
>
> Pub with base IP add 239.1.1.1
>
>
>
> Now you need multicast end to end
>
>
>
> In the MRGL Sub MOH first and PUB MOH second.
>
>
>
> Now in normal situation Branch PH’s are getting MOH from SUB.
>
>
>
> In case Sub stop working. You can add some route filers to stop reaching
> the Pub base address 239.1.1.1 to the branch . The CCM will still tell the
> phones to listen to 239.1.1.1 and you can spoof it from flash.
>
>
>
> I don’t know if this will work or not. I haven’t tested myself.
>
>
>
> But if you have only ONE MOH and you want Branch router as backup, I am not
> sure if that can be achieved.
>
> Cheers
>
> Narinder
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:
> ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *On Behalf Of *Kapil Atrish
> *Sent:* Wednesday, 25 February 2009 11:43 PM
> *To:* basant.ya...@gmail.com
> *Cc:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MOH from BR1 Flash in case Primary CCM
> down
>
>
>
> Thanks man for your quick reply.
>
> Actually BR1 is not in SRST mode. I am playing multicast MOH from Router's
> flash.
>
> Let's say I am using Multicast IP/base port of Sub and sub goes down, is it
> possible for BR1 to continue playing multicast MOH from its flash.
>
> I couldn't find a wayout to make it work.
>  --
>
> Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 13:20:35 +0100
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MOH from BR1 Flash in case Primary CCM down
> From: basant.ya...@gmail.com
> To: kapilatr...@hotmail.com
> CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
>
> Hi Kapil
>
> Here is a link that will help you:-
>
>
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/iosswrel/ps5207/products_feature_guide09186a00802d1c31.html#wp1118060
>
> Regards
> - Basant
>
> On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 12:44 PM, Kapil Atrish 
> wrote:
>
> Hi List,
>
> I want to confirm if there is a way to play MOH from BR1 flash in case
> Primary MOH server is down.
>
> thanks,
>
>
>  --
>
> Akshay Kumar takes on the two reigning Bollywood Khans. Catch the action on
> MSN Entertainment! Check it out! 
>
>
>  --
>
> Discover your phone style & WIN a Windows Mobile phone. Your style! Try it
> now! 
>
>
>  --
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY - The information contained in this electronic mail message
> is confidential and is intended solely for the addressee(s). If you are not
> an authorised recipient of this message please contact Getronics Australia
> immediately by reply email and destroy/delete this message from your
> computer. Any unauthorised form of reproduction of this message, or part
> thereof, is strictly prohibited.
> DISCLAIMER - Unless specifically indicated otherwise, the views and
> opinions expressed in this email are those of the sender and not Getronics
> Australia. Whil

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Test

[Duy Nguyen]