Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Hunt Group Voice Mailbox set up.

2014-07-02 Thread Mike O'Nan
Have you tried using Forwarded Routing Rules under Call Routing in Unity? I
had the issue where hunt group was forwarding using different extension
number then the one specified under settings in the hunt pilot. I used RTMT
to identify correct extension being presented to Unity then made routing
rule of edit forwarding station equals then VM box number.


On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 10:24 AM, Esteban Moreno esteban_mor...@hotmail.com
wrote:

  Hello Amigo,

 Got this same problem last year and Cisco TAC confirmed hunt groups are
 not designed to send the calls to VM if busy, reason I made this config as
 a queue on UCCX.



 --
 Regards,

 Esteban
 --
  --
 Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2014 18:56:39 +0530
 From: dharambi...@gmail.com
 To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Hunt Group Voice Mailbox set up.


 Hi All,

 We have 2 extension with DID,
 10001 - 40832423301- CiscoPhone- with VM enabled
 10002- - 40843677702 -Cisco  Phone- with VM enabled.

 One Hunt pilot- 2 - 40822212355;we created hunt list and line group
 and associate above two phones.

 when customer dials huntpilot DID (4082221255)  from PSTN, It  rings  all
 phones (SET AS BROADCAST).
 BUT WHEN ALL PHONES ARE BUSY OR NOT ANSWER , IT SHOULD GO TO BOTH PHONE VM
 MAILBOX. SO THAT EACH USER CAN ACCESS THIS VOICE MESSAGE.
 We are using Microsoft exchange 2007 integrated with CUCM 7.1.3 FOR
 UNIFIED VOICE MESSAGING.
 how can we achieve this so that both users within this hunt group should
 recieve voice message if they are busy or not answering.

 IF ANY QUESTION, PLEASE ASK
 Your ideas will be highly appreciated;
 Thanks

  Regards,
 DEVRAJ





 ___ Free CCIE RS,
 Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless  Security Videos :: iPexpert on
 YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc

 ___
 Free CCIE RS, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless  Security Videos ::

 iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc

___
Free CCIE RS, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless  Security Videos ::

iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Hunt Group Voice Mailbox set up.

2014-07-02 Thread Mike O'Nan
Should have mentioned I'm on 8.6.

div Original message /divdivFrom: Devakanth Gangavarapu 
devakanth2...@gmail.com /divdivDate:07/02/2014  1:30 PM  (GMT-06:00) 
/divdivTo: Esteban Moreno esteban_mor...@hotmail.com /divdivCc: 
ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com,Dharambir kumar varma dharambi...@gmail.com 
/divdivSubject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Hunt Group Voice Mailbox set up. 
/divdiv
/divHi all
CUCM 7.1 does not support vm when hunt busy or no answer. CUCM 9.1 series 
has this option Dev

On 3/07/2014 3:24 AM, Esteban Moreno esteban_mor...@hotmail.com wrote:
 Hello Amigo,
 
Got this same problem last year and Cisco TAC confirmed hunt groups are not 
designed to send the calls to VM if busy, reason I made this config as a queue 
on UCCX.


 
Regards, 

Esteban  
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2014 18:56:39 +0530
From: dharambi...@gmail.com
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Hunt Group Voice Mailbox set up.


Hi All,

We have 2 extension with DID,
10001 - 40832423301- CiscoPhone- with VM enabled
10002- - 40843677702 -Cisco  Phone- with VM enabled.

One Hunt pilot- 2 - 40822212355;we created hunt list and line group and 
associate above two phones.

when customer dials huntpilot DID (4082221255)  from PSTN, It  rings  all 
phones (SET AS BROADCAST).
BUT WHEN ALL PHONES ARE BUSY OR NOT ANSWER , IT SHOULD GO TO BOTH PHONE VM 
MAILBOX. SO THAT EACH USER CAN ACCESS THIS VOICE MESSAGE.
We are using Microsoft exchange 2007 integrated with CUCM 7.1.3 FOR UNIFIED 
VOICE MESSAGING.
how can we achieve this so that both users within this hunt group should 
recieve voice message if they are busy or not answering.

IF ANY QUESTION, PLEASE ASK
Your ideas will be highly appreciated;
Thanks

 Regards,
DEVRAJ 
  
  



___ Free CCIE RS, Collaboration, 
Data Center, Wireless  Security Videos :: iPexpert on YouTube: 
www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc

___
Free CCIE RS, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless  Security Videos ::

iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc
___
Free CCIE RS, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless  Security Videos ::

iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] 9971 IP phones

2014-05-30 Thread Mike O'Nan
In preparation for the collaboration lab I have been on the search for 9971
IP phones. After searching high and low I found the best price on eBay. The
seller name is sud6930. I have purchased a total of three 9971 from this
seller for 179-189 WITH the camera. I am in NO way affiliated with this
seller. I just wanted to share the information so people can have the
physical endpoints at an affordable price. The phones are needed at your
desk to practice video while utilizing the racks from Proctor Labs/iPexpert
over L2VPN.
___
Free CCIE RS, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless  Security Videos ::

iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 9971 IP phones

2014-05-30 Thread Mike O'Nan
Upgrade everything and take a snapshot of the image. When the demo license 
expires just restore to the snapshot for another demo period. 

I have also heard rumors of a license for lab use. Unfortunately I'm not sure 
how to get one.

div Original message /divdivFrom: Kaloudis, Bill 
bill.kalou...@kavokerrgroup.com /divdivDate:05/30/2014  11:20 AM  
(GMT-06:00) /divdivTo: Bill Hatcher wchatc...@gmail.com,Andy Vassar 
avas...@ipexpert.com /divdivCc: ccievoice 
ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com /divdivSubject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 
9971 IP phones /divdiv
/divAny advice on how to handle the licensing of the 9.x uc (cucm, sme, unc, 
ccx, cup) as well as video (vcs) applications? What would be the most cost 
effective route to upgrade the home lab?
 
Bill
 
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Bill Hatcher
Sent: Friday, May 30, 2014 11:25 AM
To: Andy Vassar
Cc: ccievoice
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 9971 IP phones
 
I was at Cisco Live this last week, and had the honor to attend the CCIE 
Collaboration Techtorial with Ben Ng.  During one of the breaks I asked him if 
2900/3900 routers were really needed for study, and how many 9971's would I 
need.  A lot of us have made significant investments in our home labs and the 
2800/3800 series routers are still viable platforms.  His response was we would 
need at least one 2911 with PVDM3's in order to set up a video conference, and 
three 9971's with the cameras.   I hope this helps everyone who is planning on 
purchasing or upgrading home labs.
 
Bill
 

On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 8:24 AM, Andy Vassar avas...@ipexpert.com wrote:
Great find Mike!  Thanks for sharing!


Thanks,
 
Andy Vassar : Sr. Instructor : iPexpert
CCIE #22042 :: Collaboration / Voice / RS
:: World-Class Certification Training
 
Direct:  +1.810.326.1444
:: Free Videos
:: Free Training / Product Offerings
:: CCIE Blog
:: Twitter
 
 

 
On May 30, 2014, at 7:04 AM, Mike O'Nan mdona...@gmail.com wrote:
 
In preparation for the collaboration lab I have been on the search for 9971 IP 
phones. After searching high and low I found the best price on eBay. The seller 
name is sud6930. I have purchased a total of three 9971 from this seller for 
179-189 WITH the camera. I am in NO way affiliated with this seller. I just 
wanted to share the information so people can have the physical endpoints at an 
affordable price. The phones are needed at your desk to practice video while 
utilizing the racks from Proctor Labs/iPexpert over L2VPN. 

___
Free CCIE RS, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless  Security Videos ::

iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc
 

___
Free CCIE RS, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless  Security Videos ::

iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc
 


If you received this message and have reason to believe the sender did not 
intend to direct it to you, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and 
delete the message from your system. This message (including any attachments) 
may contain confidential and/or proprietary information that should be read 
only by certain individuals. As a result, any unauthorized disclosure, copying, 
or distribution of this e-mail and the information contained herein is strictly 
prohibited and may constitute a violation of law. If you have any questions 
about this e-mail please notify the sender immediately.___
Free CCIE RS, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless  Security Videos ::

iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Cisco Phone 8831

2014-05-14 Thread Mike O'Nan
I had this issue on 8.6. You must download the device pack from Cisco and then 
reboot all of your CUCM servers before the phone will register. 

div Original message /divdivFrom: Marcos Cardoso 
mecard...@gmail.com /divdivDate:05/14/2014  5:49 AM  (GMT-06:00) 
/divdivTo: Dharambir kumar varma dharambi...@gmail.com /divdivCc: 
ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com /divdivSubject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Cisco 
Phone 8831 /divdiv
/divYou must find out a new package that should include this particularly 
device!

On May 14, 2014 7:45 AM, Dharambir kumar varma dharambi...@gmail.com wrote:

Hi All,

Would you please let me know that 8831(conference phone) cisco phone is 
supported on cucm 

 version: 7.1.3.32900-4.
Because  when i am trying to add new phone 8831 is not in the list.

Appreciate your comments.
-- 
Thanks  Regards,
 Dharambir Kumar
  
  



___
Free CCIE RS, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless  Security Videos ::

iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc
___
Free CCIE RS, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless  Security Videos ::

iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Making pstn call

2014-04-08 Thread Mike O'Nan
CUCM or CUCME? 
Type of GW?
PRI I'm assuming?

debug isdn q931 and make sure you are sending the desired phone number.  If 
that is fine then ask the provider to set up call screening to pass your DIDs.

div Original message /divdivFrom: Dharambir 
dharambi...@gmail.com /divdivDate:04/08/2014  9:55 AM  (GMT-06:00) 
/divdivTo: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com /divdivSubject: [OSL | 
CCIE_Voice] Making pstn call /divdiv
/div
Hi
Pl help!!!
User is making outbound pstn call but it is showing same number as caller id 
for all cisco phone user.i want to make it user cisco phone number as caller id.

How can we do...

Sent from Samsung Mobile___
Free CCIE RS, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless  Security Videos ::

iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] FXO calls heard on multiple lines

2014-03-26 Thread Mike O'Nan
Hello all,

I have CUCM 8.6 with an MGCP GW at a remote site. User A makes a call with no 
issues. User B receives or makes a call at the same time that A is on the phone 
then B can hear A'sx conversation. It doesn't seem to be 2 way in that when 
they can hear the call, they tell the customer that called in to wait out the 
conversation or call in again later. I haven't ran into this before and was 
wondering if anyone had any opinions? 

Nothing crazy config wise.  In CM I have a route group with the FXO ports and a 
few route patterns.

Thanks for any help!___
Free CCIE RS, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless  Security Videos ::

iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] 911 on phone without DN

2014-03-14 Thread Mike O'Nan
Sometimes in our environment they ask to delete the extension as a person has 
left and don't want to hear their phone ring. I am wondering if there is a way 
to dial 911 when there is no DN associated with the phone. Any ideas how I can 
make this work? 

I have roughly 200 remote sites with MGCP gw. Some using LRG...if that helps 
the thought process any.___
Free CCIE RS, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless  Security Videos ::

iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] SLRG with 911

2014-02-26 Thread Mike O'Nan
I am a bit confused with SLRG and the line device approach. I have it working 
but I am trying to figure out how to efficiently use POTS lines to make the 911 
call. My current environment is many sites with a MGCP GW at each site with a 
PRI and POTS for 911. Any suggestions? ___
Free CCIE RS, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless  Security Videos ::

iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] 2nd LD call fails

2014-01-30 Thread Mike O'Nan
Hope someone can help with this issue I'm having. I am using ucm 8.6 with mgcp 
gateways with a pri on the gw. Any user at the site can place a LD call and it 
work fine...second user tries to make an LD call and they get reorder tone when 
there are available channels. Could anyone give some insight on what I could 
look for? ___
Free CCIE RS, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless  Security Videos ::

iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 2nd LD call fails

2014-01-30 Thread Mike O'Nan
 =

Prefix =

CallingLineId Presentation =

CallingName Presentation =

Calling Party Number = 610XXX Characters hidden

ConnectedParty Transformations

ConnectedLineId Presentation =

ConnectedName Presentation =

Called Party Transformations

Called Party Mask =

Discard Digits Instruction =

Prefix =

Called Number =

Route Pattern :Pattern= 9.1[2-9]XX[2-9]XX

Positional Match List = 1270XXX Characters hidden

DialPlan =

Route Filter

Filter Name =

Filter Clause =

Require Forced Authorization Code = No

Authorization Level = 0

Require Client Matter Code = No

Call Classification =

PreTransform Calling Party Number = 7579

PreTransform Called Party Number = 91270XXX Characters
hidden

Calling Party Transformations

External Phone Number Mask = YES

Calling Party Mask =

Prefix =

CallingLineId Presentation = Allowed

CallingName Presentation = Default

Calling Party Number = 610XXX Characters hidden

ConnectedParty Transformations

ConnectedLineId Presentation = Default

ConnectedName Presentation = Default

Called Party Transformations

Called Party Mask =

Discard Digits Instruction = PreDot

Prefix =

Called Number = 1270XXX Characters hidden

Route List :Route List Name= Site-RL

RouteGroup :RouteGroup Name= Site_Route_Group

PreTransform Calling Party Number = 7579

PreTransform Called Party Number = 91270XXX Characters
hidden

Calling Party Transformations

External Phone Number Mask = On

Calling Party Mask =

Prefix =

Calling Party Number =

Called Party Transformations

Called Party Mask =

Discard Digits Instructions = PreDot

Prefix =

Called Number =

Device :Type= MGCPT1PRIPort

End Device Name = S0/SU3/ds...@rtr-02.x.com

PortNumber = 0

Device Status = Registered

AAR Group Name =

AAR Calling Search Space =

AAR Prefix Digits =

Call Classification =

Calling Party Selection =

CallingLinePresentation =

ConnectedLinePresentation =

Number Of Strip Digits =

CallerID DN =


On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 8:52 AM, Moataz Tolba moataz_m...@yahoo.com wrote:

 Check if the route list get exhausted and need a rest

 Do you have traces for the failing call ?

 Moataz

 -Original Message-
 From: Mike O'Nan mdona...@gmail.com
 Sender: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
 Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 08:29:46
 To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 2nd LD call fails

 ___
 Free CCIE RS, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless  Security Videos ::

 iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc

___
Free CCIE RS, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless  Security Videos ::

iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 2nd LD call fails

2014-01-30 Thread Mike O'Nan
I just noticed  in the trace Outside Dial Tone = NO. I have also confirmed
the LD pattern is not set for off net.

Interesting that when I set to off net it does not give secondary dial tone
until the 3rd digit is dialed. I just watched a video yesterday on how to
change that but can't remember off the top of my head?
On Jan 30, 2014 9:40 AM, Mike O'Nan mdona...@gmail.com wrote:

 Here are the debugs from the MGCP GW:



 RTR-02#debug isdn q931

 RTR-02#debug ccm-manager backhaul packets

 Call Manager backhaul packets debugging is on

 RTR-02#

 Jan 30 08:19:12.546:

 cmbh_rcv_callback: -- Receiving backhaul msg for Se0/3/1:23 :

 | bk_msg_type = DATA_REQ

 | bk_chan_id (slot:port) = 0:1

 | Q.931 length = 41

 | Q.931 message type: SETUP

 | Q.931 message =
 0802008E0504038090A21803A98397200200F36C06218137353739700CA13132373035373732383332

 Jan 30 08:19:12.546: ISDN Se0/3/1:23 Q931: TX - SETUP pd = 8  callref =
 0x008E

 Bearer Capability i = 0x8090A2

 Standard = CCITT

 Transfer Capability = Speech

 Transfer Mode = Circuit

 Transfer Rate = 64 kbit/s

 Channel ID i = 0xA98397

 Exclusive, Channel 23

 Net Specific Fac i = 0x00F3

 Calling Party Number i = 0x2181, '7579'

 Plan:ISDN, Type:National

 Called Party Number i = 0xA1, '1270XXX' Characters hidden

 Plan:ISDN, Type:National

 Jan 30 08:19:12.578: ISDN Se0/3/1:23 Q931: RX - STATUS pd = 8  callref =
 0x808E

 Cause i = 0x82E4 - Invalid information element contents

 Call State i = 0x01

 Jan 30 08:19:12.578:

 cmbrl_send_pak: -- Sending backhauled msg for Se0/3/1:23 :

 | bk_msg_type = DATA_IND

 | bk_chan_id (slot:port) = 0:1

 | Q.931 length = 12

 | Q.931 message type: STATUS

 | Q.931 message = 0802808E7D080282E4140101

 Jan 30 08:19:12.638: ISDN Se0/3/1:23 Q931: RX - RELEASE_COMP pd = 8
 callref = 0x808E

 Cause i = 0x8295 - Call rejected

 Jan 30 08:19:12.638:

 cmbrl_send_pak: -- Sending backhauled msg for Se0/3/1:23 :

 | bk_msg_type = DATA_IND

 | bk_chan_id (slot:port) = 0:1

 | Q.931 length = 9

 | Q.931 message type: RELEASE COMPLETE

 | Q.931 message = 0802808E5A08028295

 Jan 30 08:19:27.486:

 cmbh_rcv_callback: -- Receiving backhaul msg for Se0/3/1:23 :

 | bk_msg_type = DATA_REQ

 | bk_chan_id (slot:port) = 0:1

 | Q.931 length = 41

 | Q.931 message type: SETUP

 | Q.931 message =
 0802008F0504038090A21803A98397200200F36C06218137353834700CA13138313232353038343038

 Jan 30 08:19:27.490: ISDN Se0/3/1:23 Q931: TX - SETUP pd = 8  callref =
 0x008F

 Bearer Capability i = 0x8090A2

 Standard = CCITT

 Transfer Capability = Speech

 Transfer Mode = Circuit

 Transfer Rate = 64 kbit/s

 Channel ID i = 0xA98397

 Exclusive, Channel 23

 Net Specific Fac i = 0x00F3

 Calling Party Number i = 0x2181, '7584'

 Plan:ISDN, Type:National

 Called Party Number i = 0xA1, '1812XXX' Characters hidden

 Plan:ISDN, Type:National

 Jan 30 08:19:27.518: ISDN Se0/3/1:23 Q931: RX - STATUS pd = 8  callref =
 0x808F

 Cause i = 0x82E4 - Invalid information element contents

 Call State i = 0x01

 Jan 30 08:19:27.518:

 cmbrl_send_pak: -- Sending backhauled msg for Se0/3/1:23 :

 | bk_msg_type = DATA_IND

 | bk_chan_id (slot:port) = 0:1

 | Q.931 length = 12

 | Q.931 message type: STATUS

 | Q.931 message = 0802808F7D080282E4140101

 Jan 30 08:19:27.574: ISDN Se0/3/1:23 Q931: RX - RELEASE_COMP pd = 8
 callref = 0x808F

 Cause i = 0x8295 - Call rejected

 Jan 30 08:19:27.574:

 cmbrl_send_pak: -- Sending backhauled msg for Se0/3/1:23 :

 | bk_msg_type = DATA_IND

 | bk_chan_id (slot:port) = 0:1

 | Q.931 length = 9

 | Q.931 message type: RELEASE COMPLETE

 | Q.931 message = 0802808F5A08028295





 DNA from CUCM:



  Results Summary

 Calling Party Information

 Calling Party = 610XXX Characters hidden

 Partition = Internal

 Device CSS = SiteLD-CSS

 Line CSS = SiteLD-CSS

 AAR Group Name =

 AAR CSS =

 Dialed Digits = 91270XXX Characters hidden

 Match Result = RouteThisPattern

 Matched Pattern Information

 Pattern = 9.1[2-9]XX[2-9]XX

 Partition = LD-Site

 Time Schedule =

 Called Party Number = 1270XXX Characters hidden

 Time Zone = America/New_York

 End Device = Site-RL

 Call Classification = OffNet

 InterDigit Timeout = NO

 Device Override

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 2nd LD call fails

2014-01-30 Thread Mike O'Nan
Pattern is set off net and I fixed the secondary dial tone...still get
reorder tone on 2nd LD call. Any ideas from the debugs I provided?
On Jan 30, 2014 9:45 AM, Mike O'Nan mdona...@gmail.com wrote:

 I just noticed  in the trace Outside Dial Tone = NO. I have also confirmed
 the LD pattern is not set for off net.

 Interesting that when I set to off net it does not give secondary dial
 tone until the 3rd digit is dialed. I just watched a video yesterday on how
 to change that but can't remember off the top of my head?
 On Jan 30, 2014 9:40 AM, Mike O'Nan mdona...@gmail.com wrote:

  Here are the debugs from the MGCP GW:



 RTR-02#debug isdn q931

 RTR-02#debug ccm-manager backhaul packets

 Call Manager backhaul packets debugging is on

 RTR-02#

 Jan 30 08:19:12.546:

 cmbh_rcv_callback: -- Receiving backhaul msg for Se0/3/1:23 :

 | bk_msg_type = DATA_REQ

 | bk_chan_id (slot:port) = 0:1

 | Q.931 length = 41

 | Q.931 message type: SETUP

 | Q.931 message =
 0802008E0504038090A21803A98397200200F36C06218137353739700CA13132373035373732383332

 Jan 30 08:19:12.546: ISDN Se0/3/1:23 Q931: TX - SETUP pd = 8  callref =
 0x008E

 Bearer Capability i = 0x8090A2

 Standard = CCITT

 Transfer Capability = Speech

 Transfer Mode = Circuit

 Transfer Rate = 64 kbit/s

 Channel ID i = 0xA98397

 Exclusive, Channel 23

 Net Specific Fac i = 0x00F3

 Calling Party Number i = 0x2181, '7579'

 Plan:ISDN, Type:National

 Called Party Number i = 0xA1, '1270XXX' Characters hidden

 Plan:ISDN, Type:National

 Jan 30 08:19:12.578: ISDN Se0/3/1:23 Q931: RX - STATUS pd = 8  callref =
 0x808E

 Cause i = 0x82E4 - Invalid information element contents

 Call State i = 0x01

 Jan 30 08:19:12.578:

 cmbrl_send_pak: -- Sending backhauled msg for Se0/3/1:23 :

 | bk_msg_type = DATA_IND

 | bk_chan_id (slot:port) = 0:1

 | Q.931 length = 12

 | Q.931 message type: STATUS

 | Q.931 message = 0802808E7D080282E4140101

 Jan 30 08:19:12.638: ISDN Se0/3/1:23 Q931: RX - RELEASE_COMP pd = 8
 callref = 0x808E

 Cause i = 0x8295 - Call rejected

 Jan 30 08:19:12.638:

 cmbrl_send_pak: -- Sending backhauled msg for Se0/3/1:23 :

 | bk_msg_type = DATA_IND

 | bk_chan_id (slot:port) = 0:1

 | Q.931 length = 9

 | Q.931 message type: RELEASE COMPLETE

 | Q.931 message = 0802808E5A08028295

 Jan 30 08:19:27.486:

 cmbh_rcv_callback: -- Receiving backhaul msg for Se0/3/1:23 :

 | bk_msg_type = DATA_REQ

 | bk_chan_id (slot:port) = 0:1

 | Q.931 length = 41

 | Q.931 message type: SETUP

 | Q.931 message =
 0802008F0504038090A21803A98397200200F36C06218137353834700CA13138313232353038343038

 Jan 30 08:19:27.490: ISDN Se0/3/1:23 Q931: TX - SETUP pd = 8  callref =
 0x008F

 Bearer Capability i = 0x8090A2

 Standard = CCITT

 Transfer Capability = Speech

 Transfer Mode = Circuit

 Transfer Rate = 64 kbit/s

 Channel ID i = 0xA98397

 Exclusive, Channel 23

 Net Specific Fac i = 0x00F3

 Calling Party Number i = 0x2181, '7584'

 Plan:ISDN, Type:National

 Called Party Number i = 0xA1, '1812XXX' Characters hidden

 Plan:ISDN, Type:National

 Jan 30 08:19:27.518: ISDN Se0/3/1:23 Q931: RX - STATUS pd = 8  callref =
 0x808F

 Cause i = 0x82E4 - Invalid information element contents

 Call State i = 0x01

 Jan 30 08:19:27.518:

 cmbrl_send_pak: -- Sending backhauled msg for Se0/3/1:23 :

 | bk_msg_type = DATA_IND

 | bk_chan_id (slot:port) = 0:1

 | Q.931 length = 12

 | Q.931 message type: STATUS

 | Q.931 message = 0802808F7D080282E4140101

 Jan 30 08:19:27.574: ISDN Se0/3/1:23 Q931: RX - RELEASE_COMP pd = 8
 callref = 0x808F

 Cause i = 0x8295 - Call rejected

 Jan 30 08:19:27.574:

 cmbrl_send_pak: -- Sending backhauled msg for Se0/3/1:23 :

 | bk_msg_type = DATA_IND

 | bk_chan_id (slot:port) = 0:1

 | Q.931 length = 9

 | Q.931 message type: RELEASE COMPLETE

 | Q.931 message = 0802808F5A08028295





 DNA from CUCM:



  Results Summary

 Calling Party Information

 Calling Party = 610XXX Characters hidden

 Partition = Internal

 Device CSS = SiteLD-CSS

 Line CSS = SiteLD-CSS

 AAR Group Name =

 AAR CSS =

 Dialed Digits = 91270XXX Characters hidden

 Match Result = RouteThisPattern

 Matched Pattern Information

 Pattern = 9.1[2-9]XX[2-9]XX

 Partition = LD-Site

 Time Schedule =

 Called Party

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 2nd LD call fails

2014-01-30 Thread Mike O'Nan
Its a full PRI from a carrier.

I noticed that as well I was just hoping it was some config error on my end. 
This carrier is a pain to work with! Thanks for the input!

div Original message /divdivFrom: Moataz 
moataz_m...@yahoo.com /divdivDate:01/30/2014  10:15 AM  (GMT-06:00) 
/divdivTo: Mike O'Nan mdona...@gmail.com /divdivCc: 
ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com,ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com 
/divdivSubject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 2nd LD call fails /divdiv
/divI can see the release is coming from the PSTN due to invalid information 
elements 
 
Regards,
Moataz Tolba


On Thursday, 30 January 2014, 18:08, Mike O'Nan mdona...@gmail.com wrote:
Pattern is set off net and I fixed the secondary dial tone...still get reorder 
tone on 2nd LD call. Any ideas from the debugs I provided?
On Jan 30, 2014 9:45 AM, Mike O'Nan mdona...@gmail.com wrote:
I just noticed  in the trace Outside Dial Tone = NO. I have also confirmed the 
LD pattern is not set for off net.
Interesting that when I set to off net it does not give secondary dial tone 
until the 3rd digit is dialed. I just watched a video yesterday on how to 
change that but can't remember off the top of my head?
On Jan 30, 2014 9:40 AM, Mike O'Nan mdona...@gmail.com wrote:
Here are the debugs from the MGCP GW:
 
RTR-02#debug isdn q931
RTR-02#debug ccm-manager backhaul packets
Call Manager backhaul packets debugging is on
RTR-02#
Jan 30 08:19:12.546:
cmbh_rcv_callback: -- Receiving backhaul msg for Se0/3/1:23 :
    | bk_msg_type = DATA_REQ
    | bk_chan_id (slot:port) = 0:1
    | Q.931 length = 41
    | Q.931 message type: SETUP
    | Q.931 message = 
0802008E0504038090A21803A98397200200F36C06218137353739700CA13132373035373732383332
Jan 30 08:19:12.546: ISDN Se0/3/1:23 Q931: TX - SETUP pd = 8  callref = 0x008E
    Bearer Capability i = 0x8090A2
    Standard = CCITT
    Transfer Capability = Speech
    Transfer Mode = Circuit
    Transfer Rate = 64 kbit/s
    Channel ID i = 0xA98397
    Exclusive, Channel 23
    Net Specific Fac i = 0x00F3
    Calling Party Number i = 0x2181, '7579'
    Plan:ISDN, Type:National
    Called Party Number i = 0xA1, '1270XXX' Characters hidden
    Plan:ISDN, Type:National
Jan 30 08:19:12.578: ISDN Se0/3/1:23 Q931: RX - STATUS pd = 8  callref = 0x808E
    Cause i = 0x82E4 - Invalid information element contents
    Call State i = 0x01
Jan 30 08:19:12.578:
cmbrl_send_pak: -- Sending backhauled msg for Se0/3/1:23 :
    | bk_msg_type = DATA_IND
    | bk_chan_id (slot:port) = 0:1
    | Q.931 length = 12
    | Q.931 message type: STATUS
    | Q.931 message = 0802808E7D080282E4140101
Jan 30 08:19:12.638: ISDN Se0/3/1:23 Q931: RX - RELEASE_COMP pd = 8  callref = 
0x808E
    Cause i = 0x8295 - Call rejected
Jan 30 08:19:12.638:
cmbrl_send_pak: -- Sending backhauled msg for Se0/3/1:23 :
    | bk_msg_type = DATA_IND
    | bk_chan_id (slot:port) = 0:1
    | Q.931 length = 9
    | Q.931 message type: RELEASE COMPLETE
    | Q.931 message = 0802808E5A08028295
Jan 30 08:19:27.486:
cmbh_rcv_callback: -- Receiving backhaul msg for Se0/3/1:23 :
    | bk_msg_type = DATA_REQ
    | bk_chan_id (slot:port) = 0:1
    | Q.931 length = 41
    | Q.931 message type: SETUP
    | Q.931 message = 
0802008F0504038090A21803A98397200200F36C06218137353834700CA13138313232353038343038
Jan 30 08:19:27.490: ISDN Se0/3/1:23 Q931: TX - SETUP pd = 8  callref = 0x008F
    Bearer Capability i = 0x8090A2
    Standard = CCITT
    Transfer Capability = Speech
    Transfer Mode = Circuit
    Transfer Rate = 64 kbit/s
    Channel ID i = 0xA98397
    Exclusive, Channel 23
    Net Specific Fac i = 0x00F3
    Calling Party Number i = 0x2181, '7584'
    Plan:ISDN, Type:National
    Called Party Number i = 0xA1, '1812XXX' Characters hidden
    Plan:ISDN, Type:National
Jan 30 08:19:27.518: ISDN Se0/3/1:23 Q931: RX - STATUS pd = 8  callref = 0x808F
    Cause i = 0x82E4 - Invalid information element contents
    Call State i = 0x01
Jan 30 08:19:27.518:
cmbrl_send_pak: -- Sending backhauled msg for Se0/3/1:23 :
    | bk_msg_type = DATA_IND
    | bk_chan_id (slot:port) = 0:1
    | Q.931 length = 12
    | Q.931 message type: STATUS
    | Q.931 message = 0802808F7D080282E4140101
Jan 30 08:19:27.574: ISDN Se0/3/1:23 Q931: RX - RELEASE_COMP pd = 8  callref = 
0x808F
    Cause i = 0x8295 - Call rejected
Jan 30 08:19:27.574:
cmbrl_send_pak: -- Sending backhauled msg for Se0/3/1:23 :
    | bk_msg_type = DATA_IND
    | bk_chan_id (slot:port) = 0:1
    | Q.931 length = 9
    | Q.931 message type: RELEASE COMPLETE
    | Q.931 message = 0802808F5A08028295
 
 
DNA from CUCM:
 
 Results Summary
    Calling Party Information