Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE Voice Vol1 Task 5.7
Ok I just tested this again and there must be something wrong with your configuration. I set this up for my HQ phones but depending on your setup you could do it for any phones In cucm create a Route Pattern of 91900, and assign it to the proper partition (maybe none or HQ) Now assign a GW (I used SLRG) Click Block this pattern [Precedence Level Exceeded] Check boxes Provide outside Dial Tone and Urgent Priority As soon as I pick up a phone and dial 91900 it stops and plays the recording. So if this is not working it could be that you do not have it in the right partition so in never gets used or you could have a replication issue. Sent from my iPad On Mar 16, 2013, at 8:51 PM, Tony Zunt tony.z...@gmail.com wrote: Evidently, I didn't read the requirement. Sorry. Would a BLOCK partition on the 900 route pattern along with a called number mask containing a phantom DN do the trick? The DN could be a cti route point forwarded to a Unity call handler which could recite the desired message. On Saturday, March 16, 2013, Tony Zunt wrote: Vignesh Associate the 900 route pattern with a partition called BLOCK. Then add BLOCK to the top of your calling search spaces. I wouldn't think it necessary to do this. Did you select the radio button for 'Do not route this pattern' on the 900 RP? Thanks On Saturday, March 16, 2013, wrote: I have already set that and tried but no luck Bill. Sent from Yahoo! Mail for iPhone Can you try making the block pattern a urgent priority pattern Sent from my iPad On Mar 16, 2013, at 1:05 PM, vignesh sethuraman sethuvign...@yahoo.co.in wrote: Hello Experts, I am working on Task 5.7 from Vol1. Question is to block the 91900? numbers. I have configured a Route pattern to block this number but this Route pattern is overridden by a another Route pattern 9.1[2-9]XX[2-9]XX which I have created for Task 5.6. I understand the longest match wins but I need to make it work as said in the question to play the error message the precedence used is not authorized for your line. Could you please let me know is there a way to make this work as expected in the question or am I missing something. Thanks, Vignesh ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE Voice Vol1 Task 5.7
A few points to clarify, although it seems the question has already been answered... Route selection uses longest match, however the urgent priority flag allows you to route a call as soon as there is a match on that pattern, and the system will not look for a longer match. (In production use sparingly, typically just used for 911.) Partition order - this ONLY matters when you have two identical matches in two or more partitions. If your LD pattern is in a pt higher in the CSS than the block 900, the urgent priority would still force the match to the block pattern. If you had a route LD and a block LD (with the exact same string) then which ever pt is first will be used. In the event you have both a line CSS and device CSS (ie, in the real world) the pt in the line are listed before the device CSS. In this case you typically would put block pt on the line CSS and your local gw pt on the phone CSS. The exception to this is CTI route point, where device CSS is first and line CSS is second. Two good methods to troubleshoot dial plan: 1. Use dialed number analyzer (DNA) Http://pub IP/DNA 2. Dial from a phone using two methods, overlap and en bloc. Overlap is picking up handset (or speaker button) hearing dial tone and dialing one digit at a time. In this method cucm evaluates digit matches one at a time as you dial. En bloc means all at once and is when you dial the full string of digits while on hook, the you either go off hook or press the dial soft key. With this method cucm is forced to evaluate the entire digit string at once. When troubleshooting a string that should route but doesn't, go off hook and dial slowly, listening for the error tone. The position in the string where you get the error will help you find the issue. On Mar 17, 2013 8:09 AM, Bill whl...@gmail.com wrote: Ok I just tested this again and there must be something wrong with your configuration. I set this up for my HQ phones but depending on your setup you could do it for any phones In cucm create a Route Pattern of 91900, and assign it to the proper partition (maybe none or HQ) Now assign a GW (I used SLRG) Click Block this pattern [Precedence Level Exceeded] Check boxes Provide outside Dial Tone and Urgent Priority As soon as I pick up a phone and dial 91900 it stops and plays the recording. So if this is not working it could be that you do not have it in the right partition so in never gets used or you could have a replication issue. Sent from my iPad On Mar 16, 2013, at 8:51 PM, Tony Zunt tony.z...@gmail.com wrote: Evidently, I didn't read the requirement. Sorry. Would a BLOCK partition on the 900 route pattern along with a called number mask containing a phantom DN do the trick? The DN could be a cti route point forwarded to a Unity call handler which could recite the desired message. On Saturday, March 16, 2013, Tony Zunt wrote: Vignesh Associate the 900 route pattern with a partition called BLOCK. Then add BLOCK to the top of your calling search spaces. I wouldn't think it necessary to do this. Did you select the radio button for 'Do not route this pattern' on the 900 RP? Thanks On Saturday, March 16, 2013, wrote: I have already set that and tried but no luck Bill. Sent from Yahoo! Mail for iPhone Can you try making the block pattern a urgent priority pattern Sent from my iPad On Mar 16, 2013, at 1:05 PM, vignesh sethuraman sethuvign...@yahoo.co.in wrote: Hello Experts, I am working on Task 5.7 from Vol1. Question is to block the 91900?numbers. I have configured a Route pattern to block this number but this Route pattern is overridden by a another Route pattern 9.1[2-9]XX[2-9]XX which I have created for Task 5.6. I understand the longest match wins but I need to make it work as said in the question to play the error message the precedence used is not authorized for your line. Could you please let me know is there a way to make this work as expected in the question or am I missing something. Thanks, Vignesh ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE Voice Vol1 Task 5.7
Hello Experts, I am working on Task 5.7 from Vol1. Question is to block the 91900? numbers. I have configured a Route pattern to block this number but this Route pattern is overridden by a another Route pattern 9.1[2-9]XX[2-9]XX which I have created for Task 5.6.I understand the longest match wins but I need to make it work as said in the question to play the error message the precedence used is not authorized for your line. Could you please let me know is there a way to make this work as expected in the question or am I missing something. Thanks, Vignesh ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE Voice Vol1 Task 5.7
Can you try making the block pattern a urgent priority pattern Sent from my iPad On Mar 16, 2013, at 1:05 PM, vignesh sethuraman sethuvign...@yahoo.co.in wrote: Hello Experts, I am working on Task 5.7 from Vol1. Question is to block the 91900? numbers. I have configured a Route pattern to block this number but this Route pattern is overridden by a another Route pattern 9.1[2-9]XX[2-9]XX which I have created for Task 5.6. I understand the longest match wins but I need to make it work as said in the question to play the error message the precedence used is not authorized for your line. Could you please let me know is there a way to make this work as expected in the question or am I missing something. Thanks, Vignesh ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE Voice Vol1 Task 5.7
I have already set that and tried but no luck Bill.br/br/br/Sent from Yahoo! Mail for iPhone___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE Voice Vol1 Task 5.7
Vignesh Associate the 900 route pattern with a partition called BLOCK. Then add BLOCK to the top of your calling search spaces. I wouldn't think it necessary to do this. Did you select the radio button for 'Do not route this pattern' on the 900 RP? Thanks On Saturday, March 16, 2013, wrote: I have already set that and tried but no luck Bill. Sent from Yahoo! Mail for iPhone Can you try making the block pattern a urgent priority pattern Sent from my iPad On Mar 16, 2013, at 1:05 PM, vignesh sethuraman sethuvign...@yahoo.co.in wrote: Hello Experts, I am working on Task 5.7 from Vol1. Question is to block the 91900?numbers. I have configured a Route pattern to block this number but this Route pattern is overridden by a another Route pattern 9.1[2-9]XX[2-9]XX which I have created for Task 5.6. I understand the longest match wins but I need to make it work as said in the question to play the error message the precedence used is not authorized for your line. Could you please let me know is there a way to make this work as expected in the question or am I missing something. Thanks, Vignesh ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE Voice Vol1 Task 5.7
Evidently, I didn't read the requirement. Sorry. Would a BLOCK partition on the 900 route pattern along with a called number mask containing a phantom DN do the trick? The DN could be a cti route point forwarded to a Unity call handler which could recite the desired message. On Saturday, March 16, 2013, Tony Zunt wrote: Vignesh Associate the 900 route pattern with a partition called BLOCK. Then add BLOCK to the top of your calling search spaces. I wouldn't think it necessary to do this. Did you select the radio button for 'Do not route this pattern' on the 900 RP? Thanks On Saturday, March 16, 2013, wrote: I have already set that and tried but no luck Bill. Sent from Yahoo! Mail for iPhone Can you try making the block pattern a urgent priority pattern Sent from my iPad On Mar 16, 2013, at 1:05 PM, vignesh sethuraman sethuvign...@yahoo.co.in wrote: Hello Experts, I am working on Task 5.7 from Vol1. Question is to block the 91900?numbers. I have configured a Route pattern to block this number but this Route pattern is overridden by a another Route pattern 9.1[2-9]XX[2-9]XX which I have created for Task 5.6. I understand the longest match wins but I need to make it work as said in the question to play the error message the precedence used is not authorized for your line. Could you please let me know is there a way to make this work as expected in the question or am I missing something. Thanks, Vignesh ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
