Re: GLIBC problems (was Re: [ccp4bb]: NCS edits in coot)

2006-10-28 Thread Kay Diederichs
Edward A. Berry schrieb: ... May I turn the question on its head and ask, why would anyone want to upgrade, except because the people developing the software did? What new functionality has been introduced since 2001 that the average crystallographer using a 32-bit machine would like to use?

Re: GLIBC problems (was Re: [ccp4bb]: NCS edits in coot)

2006-10-28 Thread Klaas Decanniere
*** For details on how to be removed from this list visit the *** *** CCP4 home page http://www.ccp4.ac.uk *** On Fri, 27 Oct 2006, Edward A. Berry wrote: May I turn the question on its head and ask, why would anyone want to upgrade, except because the people developing the

Re: GLIBC problems (was Re: [ccp4bb]: NCS edits in coot)

2006-10-28 Thread Andreas Forster
*** For details on how to be removed from this list visit the *** *** CCP4 home page http://www.ccp4.ac.uk *** There's surely a difference whether you take care of your own computer or whether you're trying to make a local network run smoothly. My laptop, which used to be

Re: [ccp4bb]: Installation CNS on 64 bit linux OS

2006-10-28 Thread Tim Fenn
*** For details on how to be removed from this list visit the *** *** CCP4 home page http://www.ccp4.ac.uk *** On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 11:53:13AM +0200, Michele Lunelli wrote: sabuj pattanayek wrote: After making a few modifications to the Makefiles, it will continue