These things are always very difficult.
It is obvious from the TRUNCATE log that your data is incomplete past
about 2.5A and that it is very anisotropic
(See wilson graph and the anisotropy fall off graph.) ( but why do you
say the data stops at 2.2 when the graphs go to 1.9A?)
There doesnt
Manfred was kind enough to give us the data to check his F432 case with
Phaser, and I am happy to say that in our hands the solution was clear,
with TFZ=23, however the model had 16 clashes and so the default job did
not report a solution. This has inspired us to look again at being able to
Hello Eleanor
I was using the ccp4i gui to run scala when I got the SORTMTZ detected
error on obtaining record from sort procedure in return phase, status =
256 .
The error vanished when I upgraded from ccp4 6.0 to 6.0.2
In any case the old com file for sortmtz is pasted below. It seems quite
Hurrah!!! I have quite often found that the packing requirements are too
tight and ifell that they need at least to be given as a % of the CAs .
MOLREP actually has a more sensitive packing check which looks at the %
of the molecule which overlaps, and that is less likely to reject good
Jacob, ITC vol A (5th ed), sect. 10.2 (pp 804-7) contains the full
low-down on physical methods of detecting anisotropy chirality of
crystals (see sect 10.2.4 for optical properties).
-- Ian
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ian Tickle
Hi Julian,
I didn't see in Elenor's reply the calculate a native Patterson map
option and verify that you actually have translational symmetry. You
should have an off origin peak which will then give you the translation
vector. When running Molrep look at the logfile it should automatically
POSTDOCTORAL POSITION AT THE EMBL, HAMBURG
Scientific Programming and Algorithm Developing in Macromolecular
Crystallography
A postdoctoral position is available at the Structural Biology Unit of
the EMBL in Hamburg. The postholder will work in a stimulating
international environment on the
Is anyone using the OUTPUT UNMERGED option in Scala?
This file contains columns called SCALE SIGSCALE which are the
applied scale and its SD
I propose to change the names of these columns so that if you put
the file back into Scala the scales do not get re-applied by default
(which is
Phil,
Labelit.rsymop relies on OUTPUT UNMERGED ORIGINAL to access scaled
intensities with original Miller indices. However, the data are not fed
back into Scala, so the changes you propose would be OK.
Nick
Phil Evans wrote:
Is anyone using the OUTPUT UNMERGED option in Scala?
This
Hi Phil,
I use this option but not these columns. The only time I feed the file back I
use ONLYMERGE and SCALES CONSTANT, to remerge the reflections.
Cheers,
Graeme
From: CCP4 bulletin board on behalf of Phil Evans
Sent: Mon 19/11/2007 5:07 PM
To:
Dear all,
Sorry for bothering you. I have an off-topic question about how to choose a
suitable expression vector and strain to overexpress mitochondria protein in E
Coli for the future crystallographic study.
It is a human metabolic enzyme expressed in the liver. My colleagues tried to
Dear friends,
Thank you very much for your suggestions which are very helpful. I am writing
to thank you from the bottom of my heart. Here is the summary of the topic.
Best
Wei
#
QUESTION:
I solved a protein crystal structure which is about 95KD and
Hi Graeme,
even with these options (ONLYMERGE and SCALES CONSTANT) you will have
the SCALE column applied again to the intensities (not good) - at
least that's how I understood Phil. You need to use
ONLYMERGE
INSCALE OFF
to use the already scaled intensities and avoid applying the SCALE
column
Just a reminder that we are organizing an ACA session this year on
microcrystallography in Knoxville TN. Please check out the session
description below and consider submitting an abstract if you work in
any of the topic areas. Students are strongly encouraged to submit
abstracts and will
There is nothing to worry about this message. I just means that some
of your B values may be too large.
It does not affect refinement as far as I remember.
Garib
On 19 Nov 2007, at 21:13, mark Mayer wrote:
Hello,
I'm running a TLS refinement with Refmac and keep getting the
following
Hello all,
Along the lines of SCALA options UNMERGED and NOSCALE.. I am a little
confused..
I wanted to get my data from mosflm to be used for the anisotropic scaling
and ellipsoidal truncation server at
http://www.doe-mbi.ucla.edu/~sawaya/anisoscale/
I was wondering what SCALA/Truncate
Dear Crystallographers,
I am trying to gather literature values on the size of the detergent/micelle
belts on solublized membrane proteins. Does anybody know of a good
repository of this info, whether as a database or as a review paper, or
otherwise? The rough values of 15-25kD to 35-50kD
17 matches
Mail list logo