In case you end up compiling your own list, here is one entry:
von Jagow and co-workers (Biochim Biophys Acta. 1977 462(3):549-58.)
used tritiated Triton X-100 to measure the binding to Complex III
5. In accordance with the high polarity the amount of bound
detergent is relatively low, it
Dear All,
I am refining a low resolution structure of 3 Angstrom. I refined the
structure to 25 R value and 29 R free. But some of the residues are
showing very low B factors (less than 5).Please advice me how to tackle
this problem. As mentioned in a previous post I used babinet scaling in
Refamc
Jacob,
Savvas' suggestion about the the Calbiochem and Anatrace product
catalogs is a good one, particularly as the latter is fairly up to
date regarding the newest detergents. Reviews tend to be out of date
quickly.
Also, concerning methods and the odd useful measurements of detergent-
Jacob,
Whether the calbiochem/anatrace catalogues will work for you depends on what
you want to know. They do have useful info on micelle sizes (aggregation #s,
cmc's etc), but these are values for micelles alone, either in water or 0.1 M
salt or something like that. If your question is how
To the CCP4 community,
I received a number of very helpful replies to my lengthy question last
week about twinning and/or problems with indexing. I am very grateful for all
the suggestions and I have learned more about what to look for and what to try.
You will find the replies
It is worth adding a note that if you are remerging data it is also a
great idea to have sdcorrection noadjust 1.0 0.0 somewhere in your
script so that the errors are not inflated a second time by the default
values (sdadd of 0.02) - I am pretty sure that this is necessary,
certainly seemed to be.
If you don't put INSCALE OFF, the scales will be applied a second
time you will get (much) worse data
I didn't know anyone was doing this
You should get the same statistics (Rmerge etc) if you reinput an
OUTPUT UNMERGED file with ONLYMERGE; INSCALE OFF
I'll look into how complicated it
Does it make a big difference if you *don't* have INSCALE OFF? I just
notice I've been doing it for years.
I use OUTPUT UNMERGED as well in my standard scaling script, in which I
run two scalas in sequence: the first writes out the unmerged data and
scales, the second only merges. The
If you don't put INSCALE OFF, the scales will be applied a second time
you will get (much) worse data
I didn't know anyone was doing this
You should get the same statistics (Rmerge etc) if you reinput an
OUTPUT UNMERGED file with ONLYMERGE; INSCALE OFF
Oh wait, I use RESTORE SCALES with
Dear Colleagues,
I want to bring the following senior
scientist position to your attention.
Please do not reply to me but to Abbas Ourmazd
directly.
==
THE UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN #8211 MILWAUKEE
Senior Research Scientist
I am attempting to install and compile CCP4-6.0.2 along with BLT,
Chooch, etc under Fedora 8. I am doing this under the root account, with
a default login shell of tcsh. When I run install.sh, BLT and Chooch
apear to install OK and then I get these error messages:
##
# CCP4
11 matches
Mail list logo
