At 00:15 10-01-2011, Bernhard Rupp (Hofkristallrat a.D.) wrote:
Yes, exactly. 2002 papers, the question is how to
1) assure consistent deposition verification
2) how to fix omissions in earlier entries
Best, BR
PS: How did the EO confirm deposition - just ask you or the PDB, or some
more
As I said, those omissions of promised deposition are probably just
bookkeeping errors, but nevertheless, a promise is a promise. The other ones
I agree are probably unrecoverable. I know I lost an early SF set completely
and was really pleased when the PDB actively solicited SFs, because now I
Hallo Naman,
According to IUPAC:
Naturally occurring and synthetic polypeptides having molecular weights greater
than about 1 (the limit is not precise).
http://goldbook.iupac.org/P04898.html
Cheers, Tim
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 12:52:48AM -0500, naman mangukia wrote:
Hello 2 all
Does
Dear All,
Please note that we currently have a postdoctoral position available
in Biochemistry/X-ray crystallography in our Structural Biology
laboratory located in the center of Paris (France). For more details
on the project, please see the attached document.
You can also contact me
Dear All, just a new year reminder as application deadlines are
approaching...
We currently have two post-doc positions available at Diamond, one
associated with beamline I04-1 and the other supported through the
Wellcome Trust.
Full details available in links below:
Hi all,
I have been processing data using XDS which results in the cell constants
179.1nbsp; 55.21nbsp; 149.5nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;
90nbsp; 124.3nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp; 90. and the space group is C2. Checking
systematic absences have shown that the screw axis is not present. Again I
No both settings are equally valid, it's just telling you that it has
re-indexed to the conventional monoclinic cell with beta nearest to 90 (and
= 90). I believe there's an option in pointless if you really want to keep
the non-conventional cell with beta 120.
-- Ian
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at
At this resolution it is very much possible to choose a wrong space
group. So try lower symmetry first and see if it helps. Check for
twinning too.
On Sat, 2011-01-08 at 19:08 +, Dimitris Ladakis wrote:
Dear all
I've got a 3A dataset processed with mosflm and scaled. I've
runned MOLREP
On Sun, 2011-01-09 at 13:45 -0600, Kenneth A. Satyshur wrote:
So lets include them in all refinements, regardless of resolution. At
least we
will have given the community a model with the most correct biological
representation.
First of all, the fraction of structures in which the hydrogens
Dear Users,
The deadline for March/April 2011 Collaborative
Crystallography proposals will be *Jan 15, 2011.*
Through the Collaborative Crystallography Program (CC) at the
Advanced Light Source (ALS),
A POSTDOCTORAL POSITION to study naturally occurring and rationally
designed PHOTORECEPTORS is available at the Department of Biomolecular
Mechanisms at the Max Planck Institute for Medical Research, Heidelberg.
The highly interdisciplinary group focuses on understanding reaction
mechanisms
Hi,
I am running refmac on gp120(PDB 3FUS), and wondering whether there are
any dictionary files (.cif) that have already been built for the
polysaccharide (containing FUL BMA MAN NAG NDG, with NAG linked to ASN).
Thanks in advance for any help!
Best Regards, Hailiang
Hi
they are in the standard dictionary. To make sure that you have full range of
ligand you may take the dictionary from
www.ysbl.york.ac.uk/refmac/data/refmac_experimental/refmac_dictionary_v5.23.tar.gz
and corresponding refmac
Hello:
I am very novice about Small Angle X-ray Scattering. I am looking for
introductory books or review papers. Could you recommend this type of
document?
Regards,
Rojan
HI James,
Obviously, this depends a bit on which refinement program you use, and I am
not familiar with all of them. However, I have had some conversations with
Garib refmac Murshudov and Pavel phenix.refine Afonine about this, and
the shocking answer appears to be no.
wow, I've got a
Hello Rojan,
This paper from last year may be a good place to start. It provides a nice road
map through the small angle scattering experiment that a non-expert can follow
while also describing the scattering data so that a non-expert can more critically
evaluate it. I found it very
Somewhat unrelated to your question, but relevant to what you are doing:
I was once told by an expert that NDG is not known to occur much in
glycoproteins; it is usually an NAG that was built using the wrong
stereoisomer by a careless crystallographer. I have actually looked at a
few
Hi,
you can check this page http://www.embl-hamburg.de/biosaxs/embo10.html
there are several presentations plus recommended reading list.
Cheers,
Albert
Albert GUSKOV (Dr) | Research Fellow | Division of Structural
Computational Biology | Nanyang Technological University
Proteos 7-01, Biopolis
Hi Rojan,
This paper may be more on the intermediate level, but is certainly worth a read.
Koch MH, Vachette P, Svergun DI. Q Rev Biophys. Small-angle scattering: a view
on the properties, structures and structural changes of biological
macromolecules in solution. 2003 May; 36(2): 147-227.
I'd also highly recommend
X-ray solution scattering (SAXS) combined with crystallography and computation:
defining accurate macromolecular structures, conformations and assemblies in
solution
Christopher D. Putnam, Michal Hammel, Greg L. Hura and John A. Tainer
Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics /
20 matches
Mail list logo
