Dear all,
Applications are invited for a Postdoctoral Research Fellow position
working with Prof Gideon Davies within the York Structural Biology
Laboratory (YSBL), Department of Chemistry. Applicants should have a
Ph.D level qualification in biochemistry and structural biology,
preferably
Dear James,
This is technically ingenious stuff.
Perhaps it could be applied to help the 'full archive challenge' ie containing
many data sets that will never lead to publication/ database deposition?
However for the latter,publication/deposition, subset you would surely not
'tamper' with the
On Oct 24, 2011, at 3:56 PM, James Holton wrote:
The PDB only gets about 8000 depositions per year
Just to put this into dollars. If each dataset is about 17 GB in size, then
that's about 14 TB of storage that needs to come online every year to store the
raw data for every structure. A two
To be fair to those concerned about cost, a more conservative estimate
from the NSF RDLM workshop last summer in Princeton is $1,000 to $3,000
per terabyte per year for long term storage allowing for overhead in
moderate-sized institutions such as the PDB. Larger entities, such
as Google are
I installed the version with python embedded in coot
And it works!!
Thanks a lot!!
On Tue, 25 Oct 2011 11:41:38 -0700, Nathaniel Echols wrote:
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 11:40 AM, Yuri yuri.pom...@ufl.edu wrote:
Now here comes the stupid question...
How do I fix it?
Install a different coot
FYI, from version 0.7, I will not distribute binaries without python.
Paul.
On 25/10/11 17:02, Yuri wrote:
I installed the version with python embedded in coot
And it works!!
Thanks a lot!!
On Tue, 25 Oct 2011 11:41:38 -0700, Nathaniel Echols wrote:
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 11:40 AM,
James Holton wrote:
I go to a lot of methods meetings, and it pains me to see the most
brilliant minds in the field starved for interesting data sets. The
problem is that it is very easy to get people to send you data that is
so bad that it can't be solved by any software imaginable (I've got
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 3:20 PM, Pete Meyer pame...@mcw.edu wrote:
This is probably an idea that has already been tried (or discarded as
unsuitable for reasons that don't occur to me at the moment) - but why not
start with good crystals (such as lysozyme) and deliberately make them
worse?
Hello,
Does anyone know where I could download frm2frm utility from Bruker? Is it
even possible to do so?
