On Sun, 28 Dec 2014 15:37:22 -0600, Igor Petrik petr...@illinois.edu wrote:
...
DIRECT BEAM COORDINATES (REC. ANGSTROEM) 0.003134 0.005401 1.020962
DETECTOR COORDINATES (PIXELS) OF DIRECT BEAM1230.87 1260.93
DETECTOR ORIGIN (PIXELS) AT 1226.25 1252.96
CRYSTAL
Dear all
In a metal-containing crystal of (say) 200 um x 200 um, and a beam size of 10
um x 10 um, how far will I need to move away from an irradiated part to a fresh
part to obtain an undamaged dataset?
Exposure conditions: 100 % transmission at 10^12 ph/s, 0.1 s exposure, fine
sliced at 0.1
Yes, unfortunately an orientation matrix is completely useless without
a frame of reference. All it does is tell you where the cell axes lie
relative to X, Y and Z, but X may be the x-ray beam, or
sometimes that is Z and X is the spindle axis. Different people have
different and strongly-held
Dear all,
I recently had a few initial hits for my protein in conditions with
Sokalan CP5 and CP7 (Midas Screen). There is not much on the web about these
compounds except for a thread on CCP4bb last year which doesn't include
information about the suppliers. The standard suppliers
you may buy them from BASF
Even sometime back they gave some free samples for experimentation
Call them directly
Padayatti
On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 2:59 PM, Srinivasan Rengachari
02062d79acb8-dmarc-requ...@jiscmail.ac.uk wrote:
Dear all,
I recently had a few initial hits for my
