Hi CCP4 users!
A message from the American Crystallographic Association:
Early registration for the ACA annual meeting in Philadelphia July 25-29 is
open until May 31.
See http://www.amercrystalassn.org/2015-mtg-homepage for details!
All the best,
Tom T
Vice-President, ACA
Perhaps one answer to the problem of using images might be to embed
the source LaTeX (or MathML, TeX, ...) in the image so that anyone with the
appropriate tool
could then extract the source and edit the 'image' etc.
Obviously this requires someone to provide the tools, but it coukd
free us of
Two PhD positions are open in the laboratory of Prof. Arwen Pearson in
the Hamburg Centre for Ultrafast Imaging
(http://www.cui.uni-hamburg.de/en/about-us/who-we-are/research-group-arwen-pearson/).
a) the development of new photochemical tools for time-resolved
structural biology
Dear CCP4 Users
An update for the CCP4-6.5 series has just been released, consisting
of the following changes
* refmac5 (all platforms)
- various bug fixes and new program header2matr
* prosmart (all)
- fixed issue with degenerate PDB files
* pointless (all)
- 1.9.31, allow real-space
oh... I should have said that once saved, I can then insert the image where I
want in my doc(x).
Harry
--
Dr Harry Powell, MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Francis Crick Avenue,
Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0QH
Chairman of International Union of Crystallography Commission on
hi
I haven't been following all the thread, so apologies if someone else has
already mentioned this as a way round the original problem.
having had problems with equations disappearing in a variety of WP
presentation software over the years, I've taken to creating them in my program
of
Hello Everybody!
I was trying to make some sense from Bernhard Rupp's book page 251.
I will copy the relevant part...
When photons travel through a crystal, either of two things can happen: (i)
nothing, which happens over 99% of the time; (ii) the electric field vector
induces oscillations in
Excellent and interesting question—I’d love to hear an answer as well. Creatio
ex nihilo at the synchrotron?
I’d also love to hear what the evidence in the literature is for this, although
I suspect much of it would be hopelessly encoded in bristling equations.
(Nothing against equations, but
The answer to your questions depends on the level of understanding of
quantum mechanics. I am sending info where to find the subject discussed
in more details.
Bernhard Rupp's book page 251 necessarily simplifies a rather complex
subject of the photon's interaction with multiple particles.
Even I have the same problem my crystals get processed in to P212121 as
well as P4212 and I am currently analysing the data but not able to
conclude the space group. Any idea? Both structure while refining is giving
around same R/Rfree. Any help will be appreciable.
Dhaval Patel
PhD Student,
Dear Mohamed
You can get the equivalent of frame.CBF by using the duals image viewer
with datablock or experiments.json and integrated.pickle. this will allow
you to step through the frames looking at the actual integration boxes.
Best wishes Graeme
On 21 May 2015 17:02, Mohamed Noor
Dear all
I can process my 3.8 A dataset in either P4 or P422 point groups. MR searches
and refinement in SG P41 and P41212 results in R/Rfree of around 30/35 % with 8
and 4 NCS copies, respectively. Pointless doesn't seem to complain but Xtriage
suggests 25 % twinning in the former (refinement
On 05/21/15 11:56, Mohamed Noor wrote:
Dear all
I can process my 3.8 A dataset in either P4 or P422 point groups.
Do the scaling statistics look similar for both? If so, go with P422.
Trying to enforce an incorrect symmetry operator would blow up your stats.
MR searches and refinement in
I can process my 3.8 A dataset in either P4 or P422 point groups.
Do the scaling statistics look similar for both? If so, go with P422.
Trying to enforce an incorrect symmetry operator would blow up your stats.
...But in the case of twinning, lower space groups can masquerade as higher
ones. I
On 05/21/2015 05:23 PM, Keller, Jacob wrote:
I can process my 3.8 A dataset in either P4 or P422 point groups.
Do the scaling statistics look similar for both? If so, go with P422.
Trying to enforce an incorrect symmetry operator would blow up your stats.
...But in the case of twinning, lower
15 matches
Mail list logo
