Re: [ccp4bb] clash crash

2016-02-01 Thread Mark Wilson
I second Bernhard’s frustration with this, and have dealt with this many times. I note that SHELX uses an occupancy-based clash criterion that will not generate a clash for atoms whose occupancies sum to <1.1. It seems to me that this could be a more generally adopted criterion. Furthermore, it w

Re: [ccp4bb] What to interpret??

2016-02-01 Thread Antony Oliver
Oxidation of cysteine. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dr Antony W Oliver Senior Research Fellow CR-UK DNA Repair Enzymes Group Genome Damage and Stability Centre Science Park Road University of Sussex Falmer, Brighton, BN1 9RQ United Kingdom http://www.sussex.ac.uk/lifesci/oliverlab http://tinyu

[ccp4bb] AW: [ccp4bb] What to interpret??

2016-02-01 Thread Herman . Schreuder
Dear Dhaval, Cysteine 101 may have alternate conformations, but may also be (partly) oxidized (SO?). Cysteine 156 looks (partly) oxidized (SH -> SO3?). The proof of the pudding is the eating! Just fit the different possibilities, refine them and look at the electron density maps. If the modific

Re: [ccp4bb] Spacegroups, screw axes and ordering

2016-02-01 Thread Graeme Winter
HI Folks OK, so it seems that I have poked the proverbial hornet's nest with this one :o) has triggered some interesting discussions though. Actually the thing which triggered this question was very simple and is Phil's Case #3 below - true symm = p212121 but "b" axis axial reflections not obse