Re: [ccp4bb] Cys modification - deciding between CSS and SMC

2017-05-21 Thread Briggs, David C
Hi Mohamed, Did you try CSO or CSD? I've seen oxidation of Cys residues in the active site of Cysteine-dependent Phosphatases before. In addition, oxidation is more easily explainable than CSS and SMC, especially if reducing agents were omitted from final purification steps. HTH, Dave --

[ccp4bb]

2017-05-21 Thread Qingfeng Chen
Thanks for the suggestion about using NCS constraint to apply change on one subunit to other subunits. That should make life much easier. About the problem of phenix realspace refinement, I figured it out. I used GUI and when I checked the log file, the "ramachandran_restraints" was turned off.

Re: [ccp4bb] crystallization screen for protein-protein complex

2017-05-21 Thread Edward Snell
Dear Hena, You already have excellent advice but I would also look at the PEG smear approach developed by Frank von Delft’s group – Chaikuad et al., Acta Cryst D. 7, 1627-39 (2015). It’s commercially marketed by Molecular Dimensions and has features which may be amenable to complex systems.

[ccp4bb] Cys modification - deciding between CSS and SMC

2017-05-21 Thread Mohamed Noor
I am working on a model at a resolution of 2.1 A. The active site Cys in both copies have a positive density towards the S end of the residue and these blobs are there in FEM and Polder maps. When I replace these residues with either CSS or SMC, I get the following statistics. What is the best

Re: [ccp4bb] crystallization screen for protein-protein complex

2017-05-21 Thread Patrick Shaw Stewart
Hena There was a very interesting paper by Peter Sun and coworker from 2002. They pointed out that there is a very strong bias towards crystallizing protein-protein complexes with PEG rather than salt as the main precipitant. Patrick ___ Radaev and Sun.