Hi Anirban,
It would be great if you could share the compilation of relevant responses to
your request. I think many others in the community could use these examples for
educational purposes.
Best,
Nukri
Ruslan Sanishvili (Nukri), Ph.D.
Macromolecular Crystallographer
GM/CA@APS
X-ray Science
Dear Marilyn,
On 05/07/2018 15:00, Yoder, Marilyn wrote:
On Windows, WinCoot 0.8.9
On Mac, Phenix version 1.13-29998-000 (Coot is version 0.8.9)
This is probably the reason... old coot.
Get your fresh WinCoot from here (well, the stable release, anyway)
ht
Dear Bernhard,
To conclude our conversation, the person who determined and deposited
the most small-molecule structures was not a 'poor Russian' but almost
certainly Prof. Allan White of UWA, Perth with 5372. He died in 2016. I
don't know how many papers he had to review as a punishment.
Bes
I'm not quite sure what is "wrong" here except perhaps for the idea
of "manual correction". If you calculate the rmsd for thousands of
angles and you change four of them it is unlikely there will be a large
change in its value. The reason programs disclose both the overall rmsd
and the individ
Hi Marilyn,
if 'some luck' happens not to be the case you may be able to create a
good cif file for the covalent protein-sugar bond with the JLigand
tool (CCP4 suite). that tool allowed me to connect an isoaspartate
residue at both ends with my protein chain so that neither coot nor
refma
Hi Marilyn,
I have been struggling with carbohydrates in the pre Glyco module era, which
was *not nice*. However, the following strategy works reasonably well:
1) Get the XYP monomer with the "get monomer" command.
2) Move the XYP manually in its electron density. This can be very
ap
Hello,
I'm having problems adding XYP (beta-xylose) to my glycosylation chain in a
plant protein.
I have a 1.87 Angstrom map, 4 molecules in the asymmetric unit. I have two
primary N-glycosylation sites, per protein. I am not using NCS for refinement
or model building.
The density for the NA
For those of you not applying updates, the last few months updates have included
* phaser 2.8
* ccp4i2
* dials 1.9 (1.10 coming soon)
* ccp4mg
* coot 0.8.9.1
* imosflm/ipmosfm 7.2.2
plus interfaces to simbad, ample arcimboldo, and a dials gui DUI
Update ID: 7.0.050
Date: 17.01.18
Component
I found the solution by myself:
open pdb file in vim and replace segid by regexp
:%s/\S\S\S\s\s\(\S$\)/ \1/g
2018-07-05 14:33 GMT+03:00 Eugene Osipov :
> Hello everyone,
> is there any simple way in CCP4 to clear segid field?
> I used phenix.pdbtools but version 1.13 does not work anymore.
>
Dear All
update 059 contains
* fix for ccp4i2 issue when running xia2 from interface
* workaround for phaser FPE issues on OSX
* updated crank2
Current plans for future updates are
060
* aimless, pointless, rabdam, fragon, molrep
061
* update to xia2 and dials
All the best
Charles on beha
Hello everyone,
is there any simple way in CCP4 to clear segid field?
I used phenix.pdbtools but version 1.13 does not work anymore.
--
Eugene Osipov
Junior Research Scientist
Laboratory of Enzyme Engineering
Research Center of Biotechnology
Russian Academy of Sciences
Leninsky pr. 33, 119071 Mos
Hi Shijun,
Unfortunately, it happens very often that a ligand (in your case
Chloramphenicol) does not bind to the protein in the crystal. If you look into
the twilight gallery, there is a large number of crystal structures where
people desperately tried to fit their precious ligand in what turn
Hi
Thanks for all your suggestions . It is out of our hope even though it is
disulfide bond, so I wondering what's the biological meaning for this kind of
disulfide bond. I used AcCOA and Chloramphenicol when I screen crystal, but I
could only put a COA in the election density even that the el
> there is an error in your computation
No, the computation is correct. The model parametrization is oversimplified and
the input data are uncertain. Sort of the climate model of review.
Cheers, BR
From: Sanishvili, Ruslan
Sent: Thursday, July 5, 2018 02:07
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK;
Hi all
Just finishing up a new structure at 2.4A. Buster refine gives RMS bond
0.008 and angle 1.13, while MolProbity gives 0.01 and 1.83 degree. I
checked the 4 outliers from molprobity……>4sigma. After manual correction,
warning goes off, but RMS angle only goes down to 1.82
I am using Phenix 1.
15 matches
Mail list logo