Re: [ccp4bb] Macromolecular Crystallography workshop in South America 2020

Dear Isabel, dear all, I think that I might not have expressed my thoughts as clearly as I would have liked to, therefore one more mail on the subject: I never meant to say that developers should stay at home and only expert users should go to the workshops in the future, and I apologize if

[ccp4bb] Postdoctoral studies in structural biology of fertilization, Karolinska Institutet

Our research group at Karolinska Institutet (http://jovinelab.org) is looking for a postdoctoral fellow to investigate the molecular mechanism of egg-sperm interaction at fertilization by single-particle cryo-EM. The position, funded by a long-term grant from the Knut

Re: [ccp4bb] Macromolecular Crystallography workshop in South America 2020

I would like to add my thoughts. Best wishes, Isabel 1- I appreciate Eddy Snell is raising an issue that is real and I would like to thank him for it. 2- I feel the discussion should be separated from this particular workshop in Montevideo. In the recent workshop in Shanghai I was the

Re: [ccp4bb] Macromolecular Crystallography workshop in South America 2020

On 06/02/2020 10:16, Goldman, Adrian wrote: The overall bias in society is a fact but one that, maybe, that neither CCP4bb nor this workshop is equipped to handle or affect? The bias that Bärbel refers to starts very young indeed - in the early interactions that young children experience -

Re: [ccp4bb] Macromolecular Crystallography workshop in South America 2020

Dear Tassos, Dear Colleagues, Just to mention that in the UK we are guided by the Equality Challenge Unit’s Athena SWAN initiative https://www.ecu.ac.uk/equality-charters/athena-swan/ (SWAN is Science Women’s Academic Network, founded originally at Imperial College). In particular, I mention

Re: [ccp4bb] refinement of 0.73A data in shelxl

Hi Phil, yes, you are right. I mixed up the occupancy number with the part number. I find these things easier in front of the res-file. Thanks a lot for correcting this. Best, Tim On Thursday, February 6, 2020 10:26:51 PM CET Phil Jeffrey wrote: > That doesn't sound right re: PART numbers >