True. Sameer seems to be on it. In the meantime, I simly adjust my
expectations of 'ideal' :-)
Cheers br
On Sat, Feb 6, 2021, 06:40 Tristan Croll wrote:
> I know . Just suggesting the most likely cause of the problem.
>
> -- T
> --
> *From:* Bernhard Rupp
>
Thank you very much Bernhard for pointing this out. We will investigate what
has gone wrong.
Thanks
Sameer
> On 6 Feb 2021, at 14:40, Tristan Croll wrote:
>
>
> I know . Just suggesting the most likely cause of the problem.
>
> -- T
> From: Bernhard Rupp
> Sent: 06 February 2021 14:38
>
I know . Just suggesting the most likely cause of the problem.
-- T
From: Bernhard Rupp
Sent: 06 February 2021 14:38
To: Tristan Croll
Cc: CCP4BB@jiscmail.ac.uk
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] ideal ligands
That is what 'uranium atom solution' implies:
All atoms
That is what 'uranium atom solution' implies:
All atoms collapsing into one :-)
Cheers br
On Sat, Feb 6, 2021, 06:34 Tristan Croll wrote:
> The ideal coordinates in the CCD entries for BCR and LUT are null - my
> guess is that in these cases all the coordinates just default to (0,0,0) in
> the
The ideal coordinates in the CCD entries for BCR and LUT are null - my guess is
that in these cases all the coordinates just default to (0,0,0) in the PDBeChem
script.
From: CCP4 bulletin board on behalf of Bernhard Rupp
Sent: 05 February 2021 20:51
To:
