likely to be a problem.
- Ethan
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 12:32 PM, Zachary Wood z...@bmb.uga.edu
mailto:z...@bmb.uga.edu wrote:
Hello All,
Instead of placing the additional burden of policing on the good
people at the PDB, perhaps the entry page for each
of opinions, some to agree with, some to disagree, but
all of them interesting and contributing, and I hardly remember a
message I would classify as spam. And it all works without restraints.
Best,
Tim
On 05/15/2014 03:21 PM, Zachary Wood wrote:
I agree with Martyn,
Pubmed Commons
forum are probably inevitable,
spam submission of citing papers seems less likely to be a problem.
- Ethan
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 12:32 PM, Zachary Wood z...@bmb.uga.edu
mailto:z...@bmb.uga.edu wrote:
Hello All,
Instead of placing the additional burden of policing
I agree with Nat. If you think a structure has a problem area, it is much
easier to point it out to the users than to publish a rebuttal.
Comments are easy. Simply state your observation. If you are wrong in your
assessment, I am sure you will receive a fine education from the more learned
Hello All,
Instead of placing the additional burden of policing on the good people at the
PDB, perhaps the entry page for each structure could contain a comments
section. Then the community could point out serious concerns for the less
informed users. At least that will give users some warning
Hi Jai,
I had the same thing happen when I pulled up one of my lab's structures. It was
twinned, and at least in the past the EDS did not handle twinning.
Best regards,
Z
***
Zachary A. Wood, Ph.D.
Assistant Professor
Hi Kevin,
Hate to point this out, but under pH 7.0, the protonation state of water is not
50:50, and it is not a good acid. The H30+ concentration of pure water is
10^-7 Molar. In pure water (assuming 55.5 M) only 1:555,000,000 water
molecules is in the protonated, charged state (H3O+).
