Hi all !!
I am working with two data sets of same protein (130a/a) with resolutions
2.8 and 3.2 A. In both the cases the density for 100-130 aa is not very
clear.. it forms couple of helices.. i can see a long tube going but it is
feature less.. It is a MR solution.. i have tried TLS
lib32stdc++6 helped me over a
similar problem. You may need others.
m
On Tue, 2008-06-10 at 20:16 +0530, john kryst wrote:
Thanks Tim that worked fine.. my ccp4i interface is starting but the
programs are not running... i have RH 8 binaries... even when i tried
to run in the command line
Hi all !!
Sorry for the off topic question. Has anyone tried installing CCP4 and
coot in Ubuntu Heran Hardy 64 bit... I have been googling and tried the
suggestions of Bill Martyn's page... but no success with the amd 64 bit
machine.. all the instructions i get are for 32bit machines..
Thanks Tim that worked fine.. my ccp4i interface is starting but the
programs are not running... i have RH 8 binaries... even when i tried to run
in the command line for example go to $CCP4/bin and try ./pdbset or whatever
it may be it is telling command not found.. i am sure that i have sourced
Dear ccp4 Community,
I am sorry for the off topic question.
As you all aware there are many docking programs available from
commercial vendors/. And
everyone claims that their product is the best in the business. Here i would
like to ask for some experiences from this wonderful
Hi all !!
I am working on some deletion mutants. Mutants crystallized in
the same space group with similar cell dimensions. My questions are the
following??
1. Is the free R flag has to be maintained across all the mutants with
respect to the native.
2. Does B-factor has to be
Hi all !!!
Is it possible to fix one domain and search for the second one in
phaser !!! What are the keywords to use.
I have a protein with two domains. It i give both the domains together or as
two ensembles it is not finding the solution. If i give only one domain it
is giving the
Hi ccp4bb !!!
Does the rmsd estimation (for eg. rmsd_bonds ) depends on the program we use
??
Example : shifting from Refmac to CNS. There appears to be an increase in
rmsd of bonds even without refining the structure in CNS. Is the estimation
methods are different or am i doing something wrong
