Dear Kai,
you are right, but the original question was posed in the context of xia2. At 
that stage I think only diffraction data are available to decide about screw 
axes.
Best,
Herman

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Kay Diederichs [mailto:kay.diederi...@uni-konstanz.de] 
Gesendet: Freitag, 29. Januar 2016 16:16
An: Schreuder, Herman R&D/DE; CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Betreff: Re: AW: [ccp4bb] Spacegroups, screw axes and ordering

Dear Herman,

I did not write anything about the question of assigning a spacegroup
based on screw axes absences. _Of course_ this is unreliable, but this
was not the question (to me, at least). And of course I agree that one
should try molecular replacement with all possible space groups, unless
the assignment is clear.

The question, as I understand it, was whether _if you know where the
screw axis is and where not_ if you then want
a) to order the axes such that a < b < c , and call the space group e.g.
P 21 2 21 (because in that axis ordering, it is the b axis that does not
have a screw),
or,
b) if you want to have the "unique" axis last, giving P 2 2 21 or P 21
21 2 , respectively, and accept the fact that this may result in a > b
or b > c .

And my preference is choice b) for reasons I tried to explain.

best,

Kay




On 2016-01-29 15:09, herman.schreu...@sanofi.com wrote:
> Dear Kai,
> 
> I agree that Ian's response was strongly worded, but I don't think it is 
> personal. I agree with Ian that assignment of screw axes based on axial 
> reflections is very unreliable. That is why I always advice people to run 
> molecular replacement in all possible space groups, independent of what the 
> data processing programs may claim. If a data set gets reindexed because 
> molecular replacement found out that the initial assignment of screw axes was 
> incorrect, this is also a great source of confusion, especially if novices 
> follow the advice of the bulletin board to always use the original mtz file 
> as input for refinement!
> 
> Best,
> Herman
> 
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] Im Auftrag von Kay 
> Diederichs
> Gesendet: Freitag, 29. Januar 2016 13:51
> An: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
> Betreff: Re: [ccp4bb] Spacegroups, screw axes and ordering
> 
> Ian,
> 
> we have not met in the past and did not have any scientific conflict, AFAIK.
> 
> Thus, I am really surprised that you attack my opinion so verbosely,
> with strong words such as "seriously misrepresenting" and "asserting".
> Maybe a cultural or language difference of some sort that I have not so
> far encountered, nor do I understand it.
> 
> Anyway, I won't try to answer in the same or similar way.
> 
> sincerely,
> Kay
> 


-- 
Kay Diederichs                http://strucbio.biologie.uni-konstanz.de
email: kay.diederi...@uni-konstanz.de    Tel +49 7531 88 4049 Fax 3183
Fachbereich Biologie, Universität Konstanz, Box M647, D-78457 Konstanz

This e-mail is digitally signed. If your e-mail client does not have the
necessary capabilities, just ignore the attached signature "smime.p7s".

Reply via email to