and like to
learn
from you first.
Regards
Thierry
-Original Message-
From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf Of
Herbert J. Bernstein
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2012 8:16 AM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Fwd: HR3699, Research Works Act
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear Raji,
maybe you could increase the number of supporters if you included a link
to (a description of) the content of HR3699 - I will certainly not sign
something only summarised by a few polemic sentences ;-)
Cheers,
Tim
On 02/15/2012 11:53 PM,
: HR3699, Research Works Act
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear Raji,
maybe you could increase the number of supporters if you included a link
to (a description of) the content of HR3699 - I will certainly not sign
something only summarised by a few polemic sentences ;-)
Cheers
From: CCP4 bulletin board [CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] on behalf of Tim Gruene
[t...@shelx.uni-ac.gwdg.de]
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2012 11:35 AM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Fwd: HR3699, Research Works Act
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash
Reading the H.R.3699 bill as put forward
(http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d112:HR03699:@@@Lsumm2=m;)
it seems to be about prohibiting US federal agencies from having
policies which permit, authorise or require authors' assent to break
the law of copyright in respect of published journal
Dear Ian,
You are mistaken. The proposed law has nothing to do with preventing the
encouragement people to break copyright law. It has everything to do with
trying to kill the very reasonable NIH open access policy that properly
balances the rights of publishers with the rights of authors
J. Bernstein
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2012 8:16 AM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Fwd: HR3699, Research Works Act
Dear Ian,
You are mistaken. The proposed law has nothing to do with preventing the
encouragement people to break copyright law. It has everything to do
-Original Message-
From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf Of
Herbert J. Bernstein
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2012 8:16 AM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Fwd: HR3699, Research Works Act
Dear Ian,
You are mistaken. The proposed law has nothing
-
From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf Of
Herbert J. Bernstein
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2012 8:16 AM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Fwd: HR3699, Research Works Act
Dear Ian,
You are mistaken. The proposed law has nothing to do
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2012 8:16 AM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Fwd: HR3699, Research Works Act
Dear Ian,
You are mistaken. The proposed law has nothing to do with preventing
the
encouragement people to break copyright law. It has everything to do with
trying
Can non-US based scientists sign the petition, btw?
Well there's nothing to stop you! It asks for your zip code, but I
just left it blank and it accepted it.
Cheers
-- Ian
@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Fwd: HR3699, Research Works Act
Dear Ian,
You are mistaken. The proposed law has nothing to do with preventing
the
encouragement people to break copyright law. It has everything to do with
trying to kill the very reasonable NIH open access policy that properly
Of
Herbert J. Bernstein
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2012 8:16 AM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Fwd: HR3699, Research Works Act
Dear Ian,
You are mistaken. The proposed law has nothing to do with preventing
the
encouragement people to break copyright law. It has everything
Message-
From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf Of
Herbert J. Bernstein
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2012 8:16 AM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Fwd: HR3699, Research Works Act
Dear Ian,
You are mistaken. The proposed law has
bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf Of
Herbert J. Bernstein
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2012 8:16 AM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Fwd: HR3699, Research Works Act
Dear Ian,
You are mistaken. The proposed law has nothing to do with
preventing
, 2012 8:16 AM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Fwd: HR3699, Research Works Act
Dear Ian,
You are mistaken. The proposed law has nothing to do with
preventing
the
encouragement people to break copyright law. It has everything to do
with
trying to kill the very reasonable NIH
@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf Of
Herbert J. Bernstein
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2012 8:16 AM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Fwd: HR3699, Research Works Act
Dear Ian,
You are mistaken. The proposed law has nothing to do with
preventing
the
encouragement people to break copyright
If you agree, please signing the petition below. You need to register on
the link below before you can sign this petition. Registration and signing
the petition took about a minute or two.
Cheers,
Raji
-- Forwarded message --
From: Seth Darst da...@mail.rockefeller.edu
Date: Tue,
18 matches
Mail list logo
