Re: [ccp4bb] On the rotamer of Arg

2015-02-14 Thread Roberts, Sue A - (suer)
The difference between a rotamer with the possibility of 0% and an allowed rotamer is sometimes not discernable by eye. I always try autofit rotamer in Coot on this type of sidechain, and I often end up with something that, by eye, fits the density as well as the original conformation and is j

Re: [ccp4bb] On the rotamer of Arg

2015-02-14 Thread Robert Immormino
Dialing Pretty, It is certainly possible to observe real conformations of amino acids, especially Arg, that are not quite common enough to have been identified as rotamers. To this point, note that defined rotamers accounted for only 82% of Arg conformations in the highly validated data set used t

Re: [ccp4bb] On the rotamer of Arg

2015-02-13 Thread Eleanor Dodson
If you want to test this, set the ARG atom occupancies to 0.0 - calculate another map, and see what the density looks like - you can flip through the aRG rotamers using coot. Eleanor On 13 February 2015 at 06:12, Dialing Pretty < 03f1d08ed29c-dmarc-requ...@jiscmail.ac.uk> wrote: > Dear All,

[ccp4bb] On the rotamer of Arg

2015-02-12 Thread Dialing Pretty
Dear All, I have a set of data, in which there are  very nice electron density for several Arg residues. However MolProbity analysis demonstrated that the percentage of the Arg rotamer in my data is 0%. Although there is the possibility that the Arg rotamer in my data is 0%, I still wonder is an