James Stroud wrote:
1. Gee, I thought that it was specified to be case sensitive.
2. Well, someone once told me that it was specified to be
case insensitive but I can't remember who that was.
3. I thought it was specified to be something too but
most programs largely ignore
, stick to the set you proposed
(0-9, A-Z). That way it is more likely that other programs support your SEGIDs.
Cheers,
Robbie
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 16:15:54 -0800
From: merr...@u.washington.edu
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] PDB SEGID Case Sensitivity
Hi Fred,
PS And what I find really annoying is the atom type specified in columns
77-78, since the information is already present in the same line, as
CA, N, HG etc. Sometimes I just forget to check what's present in
these 2 columns and I have problems with some programs that refuse to run.
Hello All,
In typically comical fashion, the PDB specification 3.2 at http://www.wwpdb.org/documentation/format32/sect9.html
leaves out columns 67-76 for ATOM and HETATM records.
Since I can only conclude that SEGIDs must be one of those grey
areas, I thought I'd make a multiple choice
On Wednesday 03 February 2010 15:59:26 James Stroud wrote:
Hello All,
In typically comical fashion, the PDB specification 3.2 at
http://www.wwpdb.org/documentation/format32/sect9.html
leaves out columns 67-76 for ATOM and HETATM records.
Since I can only conclude that SEGIDs must be
On Feb 3, 2010, at 4:15 PM, Ethan Merritt wrote:
So far as I know, the PDB/RCSB folks do not even look at these
columns.
So it comes down to a question of individual non-PDB programs.
Which program were you wondering about?
I guess the big ones, CCP4, CNS, coot, O, pymol, phenix,
