Re: [ccp4bb] PDB redo and biased/unbiased R-free

2018-02-07 Thread Robbie Joosten
gt; Ethan Merritt > Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2018 23:59 > To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK > Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] PDB redo and biased/unbiased R-free > > On Tuesday, 06 February 2018 17:25:13 Nadia Leloup wrote: > > Dear all, > > > > I was looking at a 3 angstr

Re: [ccp4bb] PDB redo and biased/unbiased R-free

2018-02-06 Thread Ethan Merritt
On Tuesday, 06 February 2018 17:25:13 Nadia Leloup wrote: > Dear all, > > I was looking at a 3 angstrom structure from 2015 with relatively bad > statistics, so I decided to look at the pdb-redo of said structure. > Surprisingly, pdb-redo statistics are even worse. You say "even worse", but the

[ccp4bb] PDB redo and biased/unbiased R-free

2018-02-06 Thread Nadia Leloup
Dear all, I was looking at a 3 angstrom structure from 2015 with relatively bad statistics, so I decided to look at the pdb-redo of said structure. Surprisingly, pdb-redo statistics are even worse. As you can see on the attached picture, the pdb-redo Rfree comes with a caveat: R-free was