Re: [ccp4bb] Regarding Patents

2017-11-14 Thread Keller, Jacob
AIL.AC.UK> Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Regarding Patents I second Gert's thoughts Best, Abhishek On Sat, Nov 4, 2017 at 10:21 AM, Gert Vriend <gerrit.vri...@radboudumc.nl<mailto:gerrit.vri...@radboudumc.nl>> wrote: A related question. If you have a crystal structure and found a no

Re: [ccp4bb] Regarding Patents

2017-11-06 Thread Bernhard Rupp
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Regarding Patents Dear all, one of the most interesting documents in recent times on the matter of translational research and IP comes from the Wellcome Trust: https://wellcome.ac.uk/sites/default/files/transforming-uk-translation-20170 725.pdf

Re: [ccp4bb] Regarding Patents

2017-11-06 Thread Pietro Roversi
@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] on behalf of Alun R Coker [alun.co...@ucl.ac.uk] Sent: 05 November 2017 20:35 To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Regarding Patents In the UK many Universities policies lay claim to IPR as belonging to the university, rather than the academic (this is based on UK IPR

Re: [ccp4bb] Regarding Patents

2017-11-05 Thread Alun R Coker
;] *On Behalf Of *Abhishek Anan *Sent:* Saturday, November 4, 2017 05:31 *To:* CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK <mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK> *Subject:* Re: [ccp4bb] Regarding Patents I second Gert's thoughts Best, Abhishek On Sat, Nov 4, 2017 at 10:21 AM, Gert Vr

Re: [ccp4bb] Regarding Patents

2017-11-04 Thread Patrick Shaw Stewart
id, make a profit…) seems > > a reasonable proposition…. > > > > Best, BR > > > > *From:* CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] *On Behalf Of > *Abhishek > Anan > *Sent:* Saturday, November 4, 2017 05:31 > *To:* CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK > *S

Re: [ccp4bb] Regarding Patents

2017-11-04 Thread Bernhard Rupp
.UK] On Behalf Of Abhishek Anan Sent: Saturday, November 4, 2017 05:31 To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Regarding Patents I second Gert's thoughts Best, Abhishek On Sat, Nov 4, 2017 at 10:21 AM, Gert Vriend <gerrit.vri...@radboudumc.nl <mailto:gerrit.vri...@radb

Re: [ccp4bb] Regarding Patents

2017-11-04 Thread Abhishek Anan
I second Gert's thoughts Best, Abhishek On Sat, Nov 4, 2017 at 10:21 AM, Gert Vriend wrote: > A related question. If you have a crystal structure and found a novel >> ligand binding site that can be used to regulate protein activity, could >> you patent such

[ccp4bb] Regarding Patents

2017-11-04 Thread Gert Vriend
A related question. If you have a crystal structure and found a novel ligand binding site that can be used to regulate protein activity, could you patent such "binding site"? If not, how to make the best use of such findings? I would say that the best one can do with important novel

Re: [ccp4bb] Regarding Patents

2017-11-03 Thread Francisco Tenjo
You cannot patent the “binding site” because it is found in nature (you did not invent it, you discovered it and patents are only granted for inventions). I think you could patent compounds that bind that site if they are not the exact natural ligands. - Francisco On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 9:14 PM

Re: [ccp4bb] Regarding Patents

2017-11-03 Thread Cheng Zhang
A related question. If you have a crystal structure and found a novel ligand binding site that can be used to regulate protein activity, could you patent such "binding site"? If not, how to make the best use of such findings? Thanks! Cheng On Sat, Nov 4, 2017 at 12:33 AM, James Phillips

Re: [ccp4bb] Regarding Patents

2017-11-03 Thread James Phillips
Realistically, if you live in the US and 5 SCOTUS judges agree you can patent anything. On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 09:45 Francisco Tenjo wrote: > Hi. > > A mutated DNA or protein molecule can be patented if the mutations are not > present in nature and they have a technical

Re: [ccp4bb] Regarding Patents

2017-11-03 Thread Francisco Tenjo
Hi. A mutated DNA or protein molecule can be patented if the mutations are not present in nature and they have a technical effect (for example, in the case of antibodies, you could have increased affinity for an antigen if you make the right mutations of the CDRs). Also, the mutations should not

Re: [ccp4bb] Regarding Patents

2017-11-03 Thread Chris Morris
> Sorry for asking out of context question. Can a mutated DNA or protein > molecule be patented. Yes and no. A molecule as such cannot be patented. But the use of a molecule for a specific purpose can be. There are many patents for small molecule drugs, and also for engineered antibodies,

[ccp4bb] Regarding Patents

2017-11-02 Thread raj kumar
Sorry for asking out of context question. Can a mutated DNA or protein molecule be patented. Thanks Raj