> > > Ultimately, once you have classified and ranked the defects of data
> > >
> > > collection, you can look for them proactively and take corrective
> measures
> > >
> > > already in the data collection process. To some degree the automated
, once you have classified and ranked the defects of data
> > >
> > > collection, you can look for them proactively and take corrective measures
> > >
> > > already in the data collection process. To some degree the automated
> > >
> > > collection an
lready in the data collection process. To some degree the automated
> >
> > collection and processing programs do that (e.g. exposure) but there are
> >
> > significant deficiencies that are stated posterior but not addressed in
> > the process
> >
> > (e
ac.at>
Cc: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK <mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK>
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Table 1 successor in 3D?
Dear Bernhard and Gerard,
congratulations for nice results that both you (and Gerard team) have been
contributed and published !
Just a nice occasion to remind (and s
(e.g. optimal detector positions, orientations).
>
>
>
> Best, BR
>
>
>
> *From:* Alexandre Ourjoumtsev
> *Sent:* Monday, June 4, 2018 10:07
> *To:* Gerard Bricogne ; bernhard.r...@i-med.ac.at
> *Cc:* CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
> *Subject:* Re: [ccp4bb] Table 1 succes
...@i-med.ac.at
Cc: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Table 1 successor in 3D?
Dear Bernhard and Gerard,
congratulations for nice results that both you (and Gerard team) have been
contributed and published !
Just a nice occasion to remind (and slightly correct Bernhard&#
Dear Bernhard and Gerard,
congratulations for nice results that both you (and Gerard team) have been
contributed and published !
Just a nice occasion to remind (and slightly correct Bernhard's message in that
article) that the 'efficient resolution' that we suggested (2013) is NOT a
single g
