.4261 | 0.4499 |
>-
>| << 4 | P 65 | 0.0596 |--| 0.1961 | 0.2315 |
>-
>
> R-factor in the ori
I see. Thank you for the reassuring and helpful pointers.
Best,
Peter
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Twin - Data reduction and refinement in Refmac
From: ga...@ysbl.york.ac.uk
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 23:55:56 +0100
CC: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
To: pc...@hotmail.com
It seems that evidence is convincing
have not used Bhat's omit maps before. I will give it a shot and see how it
may improve my model building.
Best,
Peter
> Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 17:35:09 +0200
> From: frederic.velli...@ibs.fr
> To: pc...@hotmail.com
> Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Twin - Data reduction and refinement in R
e: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 21:51:57 +0100
From: ga...@ysbl.york.ac.uk
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Twin - Data reduction and refinement in Refmac
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
As a general rule intensity based refinement gives higher R-factor especially
when intensities are weak. Truncate smoothes out data and Rfactors become low
As a general rule intensity based refinement gives higher R-factor especially
when intensities are weak. Truncate smoothes out data and Rfactors become lower
(it is not necessary that model becomes better)
In your case it may happen that your space group is higher. To check that you
can do simp
Hello All,
I am a graduate student working on my first merohedrally twinned data set. Like
a few, I am a bit intimidated by it. After some trial and error with the help
of some online resources and ccp4bb posts, I seem to have solved the structure.
However, I am still unsure about some of the
