Thanks Frank, Luke forgot to tell me that he had actually implemented
this !
For those wishing to use this option, the Matrix line has to be
dragged and dropped on the Sector line of the segment of data that
you want to assign the matrix to, NOT to the Matrix line of that
sector.
I agree
Hi Hari,
This is slightly different, and was indeed a bug in imosflm version
1.0.0. In the new version, released last week (1.0.3) this bug is
fixed, so that if images from multiple sectors are used in indexing,
the same matrix is defined for all those sectors (ie they will not be
marked as
I am an imosflm novice and have a relatively simple question. I have a 360 deg
data set collected in two swathes of 180 deg (one with phi=0 and omega going
0-180 and the second with phi = 180 and omega going 0-180). What is the easiest
way to process the two datasets using a matching
Dear Tom,
There is a straightforward way to do what you want.
It is probably simplest to start by reading in only the images from the
first segment (0-180). Then do the indexing, cell refinement and
integration in the usual way.
Then read in the second segment of data. You
I didnt realize the following:
You read in images from the two wedges collected with the same
crystal orientation.
mydata_1_###.img
mydata_101_###.img
Now when you index ,if you say use images from both datasets
mydata_1_###.img use image 1,90
mydata_101_###.img use image 30 , 120
The matrix
Actually, drag-and-drop DOES work, and is *dead* handy!
(But a considerable annoyance: you HAVE to open the sector to be able
to click on the matrix line -- and then you have to drag that matrix
past all the 300 (or whatever) images to get to the next sector. For
many images, this really
