Re: [ccp4bb] refmac low resolution REMARK

2012-01-02 Thread Ian Tickle
Hi Bernhard So what's new? See http://ccp4bb.blogspot.com/2011/11/pdb-header-info-wrong.html (17-Nov-11). Cheers -- Ian On 2 January 2012 06:58, Bernhard Rupp (Hofkristallrat a.D.) hofkristall...@gmail.com wrote: Dear Developers, it seems to me that at least Refmac 5.6.0117 does not

Re: [ccp4bb] refmac low resolution REMARK

2012-01-02 Thread Bernhard Rupp (Hofkristallrat a.D.)
So what's new? Alzheimer's and late night senile dementia :-) BR PS: nice site! -Original Message- From: Ian Tickle [mailto:ianj...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, January 02, 2012 4:34 AM To: b...@hofkristallamt.org Cc: CCP4BB@jiscmail.ac.uk Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] refmac low resolution

[ccp4bb] refmac low resolution REMARK

2012-01-01 Thread Bernhard Rupp (Hofkristallrat a.D.)
Dear Developers, it seems to me that at least Refmac 5.6.0117 does not report the actual lowest resolution used in refinement, but instead the lowest resolution of the hkl index range generated by the default cif import script instead. REMARK 3 DATA USED IN REFINEMENT. REMARK 3 RESOLUTION